Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Granting Clemency to Antasari Azhar as the Object of a State Administrative Law Dispute
View through CrossRef
This study provides an overview of the state administrative law dispute surrounding the granting of clemency to Antasari Azhar, a prominent figure involved in a high-profile legal case. The controversy stems from the exercise of executive power and the application of clemency within the framework of state administrative law. Antasari Azhar, a former Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) chairman, was convicted in a notable corruption case. Subsequently, his request for clemency sparked debates, legal challenges, and concerns about the integrity of the administrative process. This study delves into the legal dimensions of Antasari Azhar’s clemency case, examining the constitutional and administrative law aspects involved. Key issues include the discretionary powers of the executive in granting clemency, the potential influence of political considerations, and the adherence to legal procedures during the decision-making process. The research aims to shed light on the broader implications of this case for the rule of law, the separation of powers, and the accountability of public officials. Through a comprehensive analysis of relevant legal frameworks, court decisions, and scholarly perspectives, this study seeks to contribute to the understanding of the complex interplay between executive powers and the legal principles governing clemency in the context of state administrative law. Furthermore, it addresses the implications of such disputes for the overall legal and political landscape, emphasizing the importance of transparency, due process, and accountability in the exercise of executive clemency.
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Title: Granting Clemency to Antasari Azhar as the Object of a State Administrative Law Dispute
Description:
This study provides an overview of the state administrative law dispute surrounding the granting of clemency to Antasari Azhar, a prominent figure involved in a high-profile legal case.
The controversy stems from the exercise of executive power and the application of clemency within the framework of state administrative law.
Antasari Azhar, a former Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) chairman, was convicted in a notable corruption case.
Subsequently, his request for clemency sparked debates, legal challenges, and concerns about the integrity of the administrative process.
This study delves into the legal dimensions of Antasari Azhar’s clemency case, examining the constitutional and administrative law aspects involved.
Key issues include the discretionary powers of the executive in granting clemency, the potential influence of political considerations, and the adherence to legal procedures during the decision-making process.
The research aims to shed light on the broader implications of this case for the rule of law, the separation of powers, and the accountability of public officials.
Through a comprehensive analysis of relevant legal frameworks, court decisions, and scholarly perspectives, this study seeks to contribute to the understanding of the complex interplay between executive powers and the legal principles governing clemency in the context of state administrative law.
Furthermore, it addresses the implications of such disputes for the overall legal and political landscape, emphasizing the importance of transparency, due process, and accountability in the exercise of executive clemency.
Related Results
Fixing the Support of Justice
Fixing the Support of Justice
Abstract
Clemency dates back to ancient times. For centuries everyone accepted that clemency was needed to correct unduly harsh outcomes dictated by law in individua...
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
The study deal with selected problems of international law at the time of change of the 20th and 21st centuries. Such a milestone gives an opportunity to review the achieved state ...
Сoncept, Content and Types of Procedures for Pre-Court Settlement of Administrative and Legal Disputes
Сoncept, Content and Types of Procedures for Pre-Court Settlement of Administrative and Legal Disputes
The topicality of the topic is due to the study of various forms and procedures of pre-trial settlement of administrative-legal disputes as alternatives to the judicial procedure f...
Administrative Litigation in Lawsuits Related to Administrative Decisions
Administrative Litigation in Lawsuits Related to Administrative Decisions
The importance of administrative dispute is related to administrative decisions, as the latter poses the most important means for the administrative authority to perform its duties...
Is There Justice in Mercy? the Retributive Philosophies of Executive Clemency
Is There Justice in Mercy? the Retributive Philosophies of Executive Clemency
Executive clemency is assumed to be a mechanism to correct miscarriages of justice brought about by the criminal justice system, yet little empirical research exists to confirm thi...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Paul’s view of the law in Romans and the Ethiopic tradition
Paul’s view of the law in Romans and the Ethiopic tradition
ABSTRACT
This dissertation examines Paul’s view of the law in Romans, interacting with modern exegetical traditions addressing the Old, New, and Radical New Perspectives, aiming to...

