Javascript must be enabled to continue!
One-Year Outcomes of Screen Failures for Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair: Insights From the TriSelect Study
View through CrossRef
BACKGROUND:
Observational registries have shown improved survival among patients with severe or greater tricuspid regurgitation (TR) undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVr) compared with conservative management. However, it remains unclear whether this survival benefit persists when specifically comparing patients undergoing TTVr with those who screen failed.
METHODS:
We conducted a retrospective analysis of 547 patients from the TriSelect registry evaluated for TTVr—either transcatheter tricuspid valve edge-to-edge repair or direct transcatheter tricuspid valve annuloplasty at 3 tertiary centers in the United States and Germany between 2016 and 2021. The end point of 1-year survival was stratified by treatment group (TTVr versus screen fail) and procedural success (residual TR ≤ moderate versus > moderate).
RESULTS:
Of the 547 patients, 219 (41.9%) screen failed and 318 (58.1%) underwent TTVr (transcatheter tricuspid valve edge-to-edge repair, 61.6%; transcatheter tricuspid valve annuloplasty, 38.4%). Among treated patients, 224 (70.4%) achieved residual TR ≤ moderate. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier–derived 1-year survival was significantly higher in patients who underwent TTVr compared with screen-fail patients (82.5% versus 68.4%, log-rank
P
<0.001). In multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, treatment with TTVr was independently associated with lower 1-year mortality (hazard ratio, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.18–0.86];
P
=0.020). Among treated patients, survival was significantly higher in those with residual TR ≤ moderate versus those with greater than moderate residual TR (88.0% versus 69.2%, unadjusted log-rank
P
=0.005). Notably, in patients with residual TR > moderate, there was no survival benefit compared with screen-fail patients (unadjusted log-rank
P
=0.74).
CONCLUSIONS:
In this registry-based analysis, TTVr was associated with improved 1-year survival compared with screen-fail patients, but only when TR was reduced to moderate or less. These findings highlight the critical importance of achieving procedural success with a TTVr along with early referral and transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention device selection.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: One-Year Outcomes of Screen Failures for Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair: Insights From the TriSelect Study
Description:
BACKGROUND:
Observational registries have shown improved survival among patients with severe or greater tricuspid regurgitation (TR) undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVr) compared with conservative management.
However, it remains unclear whether this survival benefit persists when specifically comparing patients undergoing TTVr with those who screen failed.
METHODS:
We conducted a retrospective analysis of 547 patients from the TriSelect registry evaluated for TTVr—either transcatheter tricuspid valve edge-to-edge repair or direct transcatheter tricuspid valve annuloplasty at 3 tertiary centers in the United States and Germany between 2016 and 2021.
The end point of 1-year survival was stratified by treatment group (TTVr versus screen fail) and procedural success (residual TR ≤ moderate versus > moderate).
RESULTS:
Of the 547 patients, 219 (41.
9%) screen failed and 318 (58.
1%) underwent TTVr (transcatheter tricuspid valve edge-to-edge repair, 61.
6%; transcatheter tricuspid valve annuloplasty, 38.
4%).
Among treated patients, 224 (70.
4%) achieved residual TR ≤ moderate.
Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier–derived 1-year survival was significantly higher in patients who underwent TTVr compared with screen-fail patients (82.
5% versus 68.
4%, log-rank
P
<0.
001).
In multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, treatment with TTVr was independently associated with lower 1-year mortality (hazard ratio, 0.
40 [95% CI, 0.
18–0.
86];
P
=0.
020).
Among treated patients, survival was significantly higher in those with residual TR ≤ moderate versus those with greater than moderate residual TR (88.
0% versus 69.
2%, unadjusted log-rank
P
=0.
005).
Notably, in patients with residual TR > moderate, there was no survival benefit compared with screen-fail patients (unadjusted log-rank
P
=0.
74).
CONCLUSIONS:
In this registry-based analysis, TTVr was associated with improved 1-year survival compared with screen-fail patients, but only when TR was reduced to moderate or less.
These findings highlight the critical importance of achieving procedural success with a TTVr along with early referral and transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention device selection.
Related Results
When should the tricuspid valve be repaired during mitral valve repair?
When should the tricuspid valve be repaired during mitral valve repair?
Purpose of review
Management of tricuspid regurgitation and annular dilation during mitral valve repair remains controversial. We review the latest evidence on indicati...
A Novel Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Suturing Technique and Prototype for Repairing Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation
A Novel Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Suturing Technique and Prototype for Repairing Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation
Abstract
Tricuspid valve regurgitation is a major clinical issue that continues to attract interest from interventional cardiologists and medical device designers du...
Assessment of STS-TR score for transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions: an international multicenter study
Assessment of STS-TR score for transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions: an international multicenter study
Abstract
Background
Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) is increasingly utilized for symptomatic severe tri...
Redo isolated tricuspid valve replacement in a patient with isolated persistent left superior vena cava: a case report
Redo isolated tricuspid valve replacement in a patient with isolated persistent left superior vena cava: a case report
Abstract
Background
Redo isolated tricuspid valve surgery has high in-hospital mortality and morbidity and is a challenging procedure. We report a s...
Comparison of Valveplasty and Replacement for Surgical Treatment of Infective Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis
Comparison of Valveplasty and Replacement for Surgical Treatment of Infective Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis
Abstract
Background
In recent years, due to the increase in intravenous drug injection and intracardiac and vascular interventional treatments among drug users, infective ...
Comparison of Heart Valve Circumference Examined Before and After 10% Formalin Fixation
Comparison of Heart Valve Circumference Examined Before and After 10% Formalin Fixation
Objective: To compare the heart valve circumference before and after 10% formalin fixation. Materials and Methods: The study analyzed 63 Thai human cadaveric hearts. Each heart val...
New generation software for evaluation of annular dynamics and reverse remodeling after transcatheter repair in patients with severe atrial functional tricuspid regurgitation
New generation software for evaluation of annular dynamics and reverse remodeling after transcatheter repair in patients with severe atrial functional tricuspid regurgitation
Abstract
Introduction
Functional tricuspid regurgitation (fTR) is the most common cause of TR. The routine imaging method of the...
Incidence, predictors and outcomes of Valve-in-valve (ViV) Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): a systematic review and meta-analysis
Incidence, predictors and outcomes of Valve-in-valve (ViV) Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background
Surgical aortic valve replacement has been the treatment of choice for patients with aortic valve disease be...

