Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Distractor-induced saccade trajectory curvature reveals visual contralateral bias with respect to the dominant eye
View through CrossRef
AbstractThe functional consequences of the visual system lateralization referred to as “eye dominance” remain poorly understood. We previously reported shorter hand reaction times for targets appearing in the contralateral visual hemifield with respect to the dominant eye (DE). Here, we further explore this contralateral bias by studying the influence of laterally placed visual distractors on vertical saccade trajectories, a sensitive method to assess visual processing. In binocular conditions, saccade trajectory curvature was larger toward a distractor placed in the contralateral hemifield with respect to the DE (e.g., in the left visual hemifield for a participant with a right dominant eye) than toward one presented in the ipsilateral hemifield (in the right visual hemifield in our example). When two distractors were present at the same time, the vertical saccade showed curvature toward the contralateral side. In monocular conditions, when one distractor was presented, a similar larger influence of the contralateral distractor was observed only when the viewing eye was the DE. When the non dominant eye (NDE) was viewing, curvature was symmetric for both distractor sides. Interestingly, this curvature was as large as the one obtained for the contralateral distractor when the DE was viewing, suggesting that eye dominance consequences rely on inhibition mechanisms present when the DE is viewing. Overall, these results demonstrate that DE influences visual integration occurring around saccade production and support a DE-based contralateral visual bias.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Distractor-induced saccade trajectory curvature reveals visual contralateral bias with respect to the dominant eye
Description:
AbstractThe functional consequences of the visual system lateralization referred to as “eye dominance” remain poorly understood.
We previously reported shorter hand reaction times for targets appearing in the contralateral visual hemifield with respect to the dominant eye (DE).
Here, we further explore this contralateral bias by studying the influence of laterally placed visual distractors on vertical saccade trajectories, a sensitive method to assess visual processing.
In binocular conditions, saccade trajectory curvature was larger toward a distractor placed in the contralateral hemifield with respect to the DE (e.
g.
, in the left visual hemifield for a participant with a right dominant eye) than toward one presented in the ipsilateral hemifield (in the right visual hemifield in our example).
When two distractors were present at the same time, the vertical saccade showed curvature toward the contralateral side.
In monocular conditions, when one distractor was presented, a similar larger influence of the contralateral distractor was observed only when the viewing eye was the DE.
When the non dominant eye (NDE) was viewing, curvature was symmetric for both distractor sides.
Interestingly, this curvature was as large as the one obtained for the contralateral distractor when the DE was viewing, suggesting that eye dominance consequences rely on inhibition mechanisms present when the DE is viewing.
Overall, these results demonstrate that DE influences visual integration occurring around saccade production and support a DE-based contralateral visual bias.
Related Results
Neural Evidence for Feature-based Distractor Inhibition
Neural Evidence for Feature-based Distractor Inhibition
Interference from a salient distractor is typically reduced when the appearance of the distractor follows either spatial or feature-based regularities. While there is a growing bod...
Learned oculomotor avoidance during strong target guidance
Learned oculomotor avoidance during strong target guidance
Visual attention is guided toward behaviorally-relevant objects by target ‘templates’ stored in visual memory. Visual attention also is guided away from nontarget distractors by le...
Interaction of the Two Frontal Eye Fields Before Saccade Onset
Interaction of the Two Frontal Eye Fields Before Saccade Onset
Schlag, J., P. Dassonville, and M. Schlag-Rey. Interaction of the two frontal eye fields before saccade onset. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 64–72, 1998. A normal environment often contains...
Reward prediction error modulates saccade vigor
Reward prediction error modulates saccade vigor
Abstract
Movements toward rewarding stimuli exhibit greater vigor, i.e., increased velocity and reduced reaction-times. This invigoration may be due to release of d...
Surface structure and saccadic control
Surface structure and saccadic control
<p>Saccadic eye movements are guided by attention. Indeed, some saccade trajectory effects serve as an index the attentional strength of visual objects in the...
Target templates and the time course of distractor location learning
Target templates and the time course of distractor location learning
When searching for a shape target, colour distractors typically capture our attention. Capture is smaller when observers search for a fixed target that allows for a feature-specifi...
Saccade Automation
Saccade Automation
The comparative analysis of basic saccade characteristics (interval, amplitude, and coefficient of asymmetry) has shown considerable similarities in adults and first-year babies. D...
Two-dimensional perisaccadic visual mislocalization in rhesus macaque monkeys
Two-dimensional perisaccadic visual mislocalization in rhesus macaque monkeys
Abstract
Perceptual localization of brief, high contrast perisaccadic visual probes is grossly erroneous. While this phenomenon has been extensively studied in huma...

