Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Temporal trends in readmissions after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Although readmissions after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) were frequent in initial experiences, it is unknown if the incidence of readmission has changed with technological advances and other factors.
Purpose
Assess temporal trends in 30-day readmission after TAVR
Methods
Hospitalizations of adults aged ≥50, with aortic stenosis and undergoing elective TAVR or SAVR between 2012 and 2016 in the National Readmission Database were analyzed. Causes of 30-day readmission were classified as cardiovascular (CV) and non-cardiovascular (non-CV). Poisson regression was used to assess quarterly trends in TAVR and SAVR readmissions.
Results
Overall, 29,031 TAVR and 72,412 SAVR hospitalizations were included (weighted N 56,858 TAVR and 151,899 SAVR), and 14% were readmitted within 30-days (TAVR: 15%; SAVR: 13%). Of all the readmissions, 38% were cardiovascular (TAVR: 35%; SAVR: 40%). Between January 2012 and November 2016, the incidence of overall 30-day readmission significantly declined from 20% to 13% (CIE −0.13, 95% CI: −0.13, −0.13, p<0.0001) after TAVR and from 15% to 12% (CIE −0.05, 95% CI: −0.05, −0.05, p<0.0001) after SAVR. When stratified by readmission cause, the incidence of both CV (7.2% to 4.2%; CIE −0.18, 95% CI: −0.18, −0.18, p<0.0001) and non-CV readmissions declined after TAVR (14% to 9.0%; CIE −0.24, 95% CI: −0.24, −0.24, p<0.0001), Figure 1. CV readmissions (5.6% to 4.7%; CIE −0.05, 95% CI: −0.05, −0.05, p<0.0001) and non-CV readmissions (9.7% to 7.7%; CIE −0.12, 95% CI: −0.12, −0.12, p<0.0001) also declined after SAVR. Finally, the cost of TAVR admissions decreased for both patients who were not readmitted within 30-days (CIE −2.3, 95% CI: −2.5, −2.0, p<0.0001) and patients who were readmitted (CIE −1.9, 95% CI: −2.6, −1.2, p<0.0001) from 2012 to 2016. Costs of readmission have not changed (CIE −0.23, 95% CI: −0.80, 0.35, p=0.44).
Conclusion
Readmissions after TAVR have declined over the last several years, likely due to improvements in technology and operator experience, greater attention to comorbidities, and reductions in inpatient complications. More work is needed to reduce further inpatient complications and the incidence of readmission.
Figure 1
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding source: None
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: Temporal trends in readmissions after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Description:
Abstract
Background
Although readmissions after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) were frequent in initial experiences, it is unknown if the incidence of readmission has changed with technological advances and other factors.
Purpose
Assess temporal trends in 30-day readmission after TAVR
Methods
Hospitalizations of adults aged ≥50, with aortic stenosis and undergoing elective TAVR or SAVR between 2012 and 2016 in the National Readmission Database were analyzed.
Causes of 30-day readmission were classified as cardiovascular (CV) and non-cardiovascular (non-CV).
Poisson regression was used to assess quarterly trends in TAVR and SAVR readmissions.
Results
Overall, 29,031 TAVR and 72,412 SAVR hospitalizations were included (weighted N 56,858 TAVR and 151,899 SAVR), and 14% were readmitted within 30-days (TAVR: 15%; SAVR: 13%).
Of all the readmissions, 38% were cardiovascular (TAVR: 35%; SAVR: 40%).
Between January 2012 and November 2016, the incidence of overall 30-day readmission significantly declined from 20% to 13% (CIE −0.
13, 95% CI: −0.
13, −0.
13, p<0.
0001) after TAVR and from 15% to 12% (CIE −0.
05, 95% CI: −0.
05, −0.
05, p<0.
0001) after SAVR.
When stratified by readmission cause, the incidence of both CV (7.
2% to 4.
2%; CIE −0.
18, 95% CI: −0.
18, −0.
18, p<0.
0001) and non-CV readmissions declined after TAVR (14% to 9.
0%; CIE −0.
24, 95% CI: −0.
24, −0.
24, p<0.
0001), Figure 1.
CV readmissions (5.
6% to 4.
7%; CIE −0.
05, 95% CI: −0.
05, −0.
05, p<0.
0001) and non-CV readmissions (9.
7% to 7.
7%; CIE −0.
12, 95% CI: −0.
12, −0.
12, p<0.
0001) also declined after SAVR.
Finally, the cost of TAVR admissions decreased for both patients who were not readmitted within 30-days (CIE −2.
3, 95% CI: −2.
5, −2.
0, p<0.
0001) and patients who were readmitted (CIE −1.
9, 95% CI: −2.
6, −1.
2, p<0.
0001) from 2012 to 2016.
Costs of readmission have not changed (CIE −0.
23, 95% CI: −0.
80, 0.
35, p=0.
44).
Conclusion
Readmissions after TAVR have declined over the last several years, likely due to improvements in technology and operator experience, greater attention to comorbidities, and reductions in inpatient complications.
More work is needed to reduce further inpatient complications and the incidence of readmission.
Figure 1
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding source: None.
Related Results
ReCAP: Insights Into the Potential Preventability of Oncology Readmissions
ReCAP: Insights Into the Potential Preventability of Oncology Readmissions
QUESTION ADDRESSED: Are oncology readmissions preventable? If so, what resources and changes in practice or culture would be required to reduce readmissions? CONCLUSION: Three inde...
Incidence, predictors and outcomes of Valve-in-valve (ViV) Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): a systematic review and meta-analysis
Incidence, predictors and outcomes of Valve-in-valve (ViV) Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background
Surgical aortic valve replacement has been the treatment of choice for patients with aortic valve disease be...
AORTIC ROOT ANEURYSM OR ECTASIA TREATED WITH AORTIC ROOT WRAPPED PROCEDURE
AORTIC ROOT ANEURYSM OR ECTASIA TREATED WITH AORTIC ROOT WRAPPED PROCEDURE
Objectives
To develop a relatively simple and effective and less risk operation, aortic root wrapped procedure, to treat with aortic root aneurysm or ectasia.
...
Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement by Congenital Heart Surgeons: A Single Center Experience.
Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement by Congenital Heart Surgeons: A Single Center Experience.
Background Aortic root dilatation and aortic insufficiency can
occur in patients with prior conotruncal defect surgery, the Ross
procedure, and connective tissue disease (CTD). Val...
Ten year follow‐up of high‐risk patients treated during the early experience with transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Ten year follow‐up of high‐risk patients treated during the early experience with transcatheter aortic valve replacement
AbstractBackgroundThe long‐term clinical performance of transcatheter heart valves (THV) is unknown.AimsThis study assessed the clinical outcomes, rate of structural valve deterior...
Techniques of Aortic Valve Repair
Techniques of Aortic Valve Repair
Similar to mitral repair, newer methods of aortic valve reconstruction are achieving excellent outcomes with an 85% to 90% freedom from valve-related complications at 10 years. The...
Infective endocarditis of quadricuspid aortic valve
Infective endocarditis of quadricuspid aortic valve
Abstract
Background
Infective endocarditis of the aortic valve is a relatively common disease presentation, with surgical intervention a mainstay of...
An Acoustically Controlled Down-Hole Safety Valve (SCSSSV)
An Acoustically Controlled Down-Hole Safety Valve (SCSSSV)
American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, Inc.
Abstract
A surface-controlled subsurface safety valve...

