Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Immediate vs. Delayed Loading of Mandibular Mini-Implant Overdentures: A 12-Month Comparative Randomized Controlled Trial

View through CrossRef
Background and Aim: While mini-dental implants (MDIs) provide a minimally invasive surgical solution for prosthesis stabilization, the optimal timing for functional loading remains highly contested in the scientific literature. This clinical trial sought to evaluate the effects of immediate versus delayed loading protocols on marginal bone level (MBL) changes and peri-implant mucosal health around MDIs supporting mandibular overdentures. Methods: Twenty completely edentulous patients experiencing mandibular atrophy were randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to either an Immediate Loading Group (n=10) or a Delayed Loading Group (n=10). Each participant received four one-piece mini-implants in the interforaminal region utilizing a flapless surgical approach. Implants in the immediate cohort were functionally loaded on the day of surgery via O-ring attachments. The delayed cohort received functional loading after a stringent three-month unloaded healing period. The primary outcome measure was MBL change, quantified via standardized digital periapical radiographs. Secondary outcomes included the Gingival Index (GI) and Probing Depth (PD). Statistical analysis was executed using repeated measures ANOVA and independent t-tests with a significance threshold set at α=0.05. Results: A total of 80 implants were placed, achieving a 100% cumulative survival rate at the twelve-month follow-up. Both groups exhibited progressive, physiological crestal bone remodeling. At twelve months, the Immediate Loading Group demonstrated a mean MBL of 0.87 ± 0.22 mm (95% CI: 0.79, 0.95), whereas the Delayed Loading Group exhibited a mean MBL of 1.01 ± 0.25 mm (95% CI: 0.92, 1.10). While this 0.14 mm variance was statistically significant (p = 0.042), it remains clinically negligible. GI scores were transiently lower in the immediate group at three and six months (p < 0.05) but converged completely by twelve months (Immediate: 1.88 ± 0.41; Delayed: 2.13 ± 0.52; p = 0.18). PD showed no statistically significant divergence between the cohorts across any observation interval. Conclusions: The immediate functional loading of 1.8 mm MDIs for the stabilization of mandibular overdentures resulted in highly comparable and predictable twelve-month clinical and radiographic outcomes when juxtaposed against a conventional delayed protocol. The immediate application of controlled functional forces did not precipitate adverse peri-implant tissue responses or pathological osteolysis, thereby validating the protocol as a predictable and patient-centric clinical modality.
Title: Immediate vs. Delayed Loading of Mandibular Mini-Implant Overdentures: A 12-Month Comparative Randomized Controlled Trial
Description:
Background and Aim: While mini-dental implants (MDIs) provide a minimally invasive surgical solution for prosthesis stabilization, the optimal timing for functional loading remains highly contested in the scientific literature.
This clinical trial sought to evaluate the effects of immediate versus delayed loading protocols on marginal bone level (MBL) changes and peri-implant mucosal health around MDIs supporting mandibular overdentures.
Methods: Twenty completely edentulous patients experiencing mandibular atrophy were randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to either an Immediate Loading Group (n=10) or a Delayed Loading Group (n=10).
Each participant received four one-piece mini-implants in the interforaminal region utilizing a flapless surgical approach.
Implants in the immediate cohort were functionally loaded on the day of surgery via O-ring attachments.
The delayed cohort received functional loading after a stringent three-month unloaded healing period.
The primary outcome measure was MBL change, quantified via standardized digital periapical radiographs.
Secondary outcomes included the Gingival Index (GI) and Probing Depth (PD).
Statistical analysis was executed using repeated measures ANOVA and independent t-tests with a significance threshold set at α=0.
05.
Results: A total of 80 implants were placed, achieving a 100% cumulative survival rate at the twelve-month follow-up.
Both groups exhibited progressive, physiological crestal bone remodeling.
At twelve months, the Immediate Loading Group demonstrated a mean MBL of 0.
87 ± 0.
22 mm (95% CI: 0.
79, 0.
95), whereas the Delayed Loading Group exhibited a mean MBL of 1.
01 ± 0.
25 mm (95% CI: 0.
92, 1.
10).
While this 0.
14 mm variance was statistically significant (p = 0.
042), it remains clinically negligible.
GI scores were transiently lower in the immediate group at three and six months (p < 0.
05) but converged completely by twelve months (Immediate: 1.
88 ± 0.
41; Delayed: 2.
13 ± 0.
52; p = 0.
18).
PD showed no statistically significant divergence between the cohorts across any observation interval.
Conclusions: The immediate functional loading of 1.
8 mm MDIs for the stabilization of mandibular overdentures resulted in highly comparable and predictable twelve-month clinical and radiographic outcomes when juxtaposed against a conventional delayed protocol.
The immediate application of controlled functional forces did not precipitate adverse peri-implant tissue responses or pathological osteolysis, thereby validating the protocol as a predictable and patient-centric clinical modality.

Related Results

Comparative Clinical Study of Conventional Dental Implants and Mini Dental Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Comparative Clinical Study of Conventional Dental Implants and Mini Dental Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Clinical Trial
AbstractBackgroundDental implant‐retained overdentures have been chosen as the treatment of choice for complete mandibular removable dentures. Dental implants, such as mini dental ...
Studies on maxillary overdentures: implant- and prosthesis survival, cost analysis and patient-reported outcomes
Studies on maxillary overdentures: implant- and prosthesis survival, cost analysis and patient-reported outcomes
Edentulism is a debilitating condition which may negatively affect quality of life, particularly in relation to nutritional and social health, speech, and poor facial appearance. P...
Swallowing dynamics of two implants versus single implant-retained mandibular overdentures: randomized clinical trial
Swallowing dynamics of two implants versus single implant-retained mandibular overdentures: randomized clinical trial
Objective This study evaluated the swallowing dynamics of two-implant (2-IOD) versus singleimplant (1-IOD) mandibular overdentures using the Test of Mastication and Swallowing Soli...
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MONOCORTICAL AND BICORTICAL METHODS OF INSTALLING MINI-IMPLANTS
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MONOCORTICAL AND BICORTICAL METHODS OF INSTALLING MINI-IMPLANTS
The aim of the study. Carry out a comparative analysis of the support ability of human jaw bone tissue in monocortical and bicortical installation of a mini-implant of own design O...

Back to Top