Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Aquaculture and Fish Welfare: Are the Rights of Fish Compromised?/ Akwakultura I Dobrostan Ryb: Czy Prawa Ryb Są Szanowane?

View through CrossRef
Abstract Fish need adequate welfare in culture even more than when they are in the wild. This is because they are held in captivity against their ‘will’. The welfare of farmed fish should start from production to consumption. Several factors have been identified as compromising the rights and welfare of fish in aquaculture. These include the aquacultural holding devices, stocking density, water quality, food and feeding regimes, diseases and parasite infestation, treatment of the diseases and parasites, handling, netting and removal before and during slaughter, methods of slaughter, fasting/ food withdrawal, unnatural dark/light photoperiods, selection for fast growth, selective and induced breeding, genetic manipulations, exposure to predators, polyculture, tagging, crowding, grading, transport and harvesting, fish attractors and accidental or deliberate introduction of genetically modified farmed fish. The best way to achieve good welfare and health of fish in aquaculture is to respect, maintain and improve the rights of fish, otherwise known as the “five freedoms.” Lack, deficiency or difficulty in having or providing any one of the five freedoms in aquaculture is an indicator of poor welfare for the fish which could be observed through physical, physiological, morphological, behavioural or environmental indicators in the fish. The best strategy for a reliable assessment of fish welfare/suffering and their impact on product quality is a multidisciplinary approach using several assessment parameters and comparing the deviations from the normal biological state with those from the wild which live in their natural, unperturbed environment. Some of the ways to achieve good welfare and safeguard the rights of the farmed fish in reducing the welfare problems were highlighted. Welfare of farmed fish should be considered in terms of ethics, productivity, economic viability and consumer’s acceptability of the final product. Consumers are becoming aware of the quality of farmed fish arising from poor welfare of the fish during culture. Improvement in fish welfare will increase profits, productivity and acceptability of the farmed fish because fish that are less stressedand humanely slaugh tered are healthier, grow better and have better meat quality. There is the need to develop common standard welfare indices for fish in culture in order to detect, correct and improve any deviation from the normal state of the fish in their aquacultural holding devices (AHD). It should be known that whatever is good in terms of welfare to humans should also be good to the fish in captivity.
Title: Aquaculture and Fish Welfare: Are the Rights of Fish Compromised?/ Akwakultura I Dobrostan Ryb: Czy Prawa Ryb Są Szanowane?
Description:
Abstract Fish need adequate welfare in culture even more than when they are in the wild.
This is because they are held in captivity against their ‘will’.
The welfare of farmed fish should start from production to consumption.
Several factors have been identified as compromising the rights and welfare of fish in aquaculture.
These include the aquacultural holding devices, stocking density, water quality, food and feeding regimes, diseases and parasite infestation, treatment of the diseases and parasites, handling, netting and removal before and during slaughter, methods of slaughter, fasting/ food withdrawal, unnatural dark/light photoperiods, selection for fast growth, selective and induced breeding, genetic manipulations, exposure to predators, polyculture, tagging, crowding, grading, transport and harvesting, fish attractors and accidental or deliberate introduction of genetically modified farmed fish.
The best way to achieve good welfare and health of fish in aquaculture is to respect, maintain and improve the rights of fish, otherwise known as the “five freedoms.
” Lack, deficiency or difficulty in having or providing any one of the five freedoms in aquaculture is an indicator of poor welfare for the fish which could be observed through physical, physiological, morphological, behavioural or environmental indicators in the fish.
The best strategy for a reliable assessment of fish welfare/suffering and their impact on product quality is a multidisciplinary approach using several assessment parameters and comparing the deviations from the normal biological state with those from the wild which live in their natural, unperturbed environment.
Some of the ways to achieve good welfare and safeguard the rights of the farmed fish in reducing the welfare problems were highlighted.
Welfare of farmed fish should be considered in terms of ethics, productivity, economic viability and consumer’s acceptability of the final product.
Consumers are becoming aware of the quality of farmed fish arising from poor welfare of the fish during culture.
Improvement in fish welfare will increase profits, productivity and acceptability of the farmed fish because fish that are less stressedand humanely slaugh tered are healthier, grow better and have better meat quality.
There is the need to develop common standard welfare indices for fish in culture in order to detect, correct and improve any deviation from the normal state of the fish in their aquacultural holding devices (AHD).
It should be known that whatever is good in terms of welfare to humans should also be good to the fish in captivity.

Related Results

On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash ABSTRACT In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Pewność prawa
Pewność prawa
Niewątpliwie kluczowe znaczenie dla kształtowania się ładu publicznego w państwie ma pewność prawa. Problem pewności prawa może być ujmowany w różnych płaszczyznach odniesienia. Sz...
Budżet a normy prawa podatkowego
Budżet a normy prawa podatkowego
Przedmiot badań: Niniejszy artykuł poświęcony jest wybranym relacjom prawnym i faktycz­nym zachodzącym między budżetem a normami prawa podatkowego, dotyczącym gromadzenia dochodów ...
Visioning the future of Aquaculture in Hawai‘i
Visioning the future of Aquaculture in Hawai‘i
The University of Hawai‘i Aquaculture Program and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Hawaiian Islands Humpback Whale National Marine San...
Miejsce prawa handlowego w systemie prawa i sposoby jego regulacji
Miejsce prawa handlowego w systemie prawa i sposoby jego regulacji
Opracowanie koncentruje się na dwóch zagadnieniach — miejscu prawa handlowego w systemie prawa oraz sposobach regulacji prawa handlowego. Odnośnie do pierwszego z nich przedstawion...
Satellite observed rapid inland aquaculture expansion in Jianghan Plain, China from 2016 to 2022
Satellite observed rapid inland aquaculture expansion in Jianghan Plain, China from 2016 to 2022
Inland freshwater aquaculture which includes a new crop-aquaculture system accounts for 77 % of aquaculture production worldwide and contributed significantly to the global demand ...
Environmental Impacts of Wastes and Contaminants from Aquaculture and Their Remediation Techniques
Environmental Impacts of Wastes and Contaminants from Aquaculture and Their Remediation Techniques
World food production needs to increase as the human population is increasing too steadily over the years. On the other hand, global food production sectors are being compromised a...
Autonomia prawa w krytycznej teorii prawa
Autonomia prawa w krytycznej teorii prawa
Przedmiotem analizy niniejszego artykułu jest koncepcja autonomii prawa w krytycznej teorii prawa. W swoich rozważaniach odnoszę się zarówno do tradycyjnych, jak i najnowszych spos...

Back to Top