Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Abstract 1644: Pancreatic cancer survival prediction using machine learning and comparing its performance with TNM staging system and prognostic nomograms

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background: Pancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest cancers with a 5-year survival rate of only 6%. Patients with cancer often want to know how long they have left to live and it’s the first question patients ask after diagnosis. Reliable predictions are very important for achieving more personalized care and better management. However, the accuracy of physicians' clinical predictions of survival is poor. Predicting pancreatic cancer survival is challenging due to different tumor characteristics, treatments and patient populations. In this study, we evaluate the performance of Machine Learning (ML) in survival prediction compared to TNM system and published nomograms. Methods: Pancreatic cancer patients were identified through the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (SEER). Clinical data of the patients were extracted including: age, sex, race, marital status, tumor site, tumor histology, grade, tumor size, extension, Lymph Node (L.N) involvement, metastasis, cancer sequence, TNM stage, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, examined (L.N), positive (L.N) and survival months. Patients’ records were randomly divided into a training set (80%) and a validation set (20%). ML algorithms were tested to predict survival at 6, 12 and 24 months as well as TNM staging system and two nomograms. Results: A total number of 22,700 patients were identified through SEER from 2004 – 2013 with median survival of 12 months. The most common primary sites were head of pancreas (62.8%), tail (13.2%), and body (10.7%). Random Forests algorithm achieved better results compared to other models. The trained model yielded Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUCs) of 86.6% at 6 months, 83.4% at 12 months and 82.2% at 24 months. Compared to TNM staging system which achieved AUCs of 66.6% at 6 months, 65.5% at 12 months and 57% at 24 months. The nomograms achieved AUCs of 71.1% and 55.2% in predicting 1-year-survival. Sensitivity of the trained model were 80%, 75% and 79% at 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. The most important characteristics which influenced the model prediction performance were: age at diagnosis, surgery and tumor size. Conclusion: Machine learning achieved a much better performance compared to TNM staging system and prognostic nomograms. Improved survival prediction can help in in making better treatment decisions and planning social and care needs. Citation Format: Mohamed H. Osman. Pancreatic cancer survival prediction using machine learning and comparing its performance with TNM staging system and prognostic nomograms [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1644.
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Title: Abstract 1644: Pancreatic cancer survival prediction using machine learning and comparing its performance with TNM staging system and prognostic nomograms
Description:
Abstract Background: Pancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest cancers with a 5-year survival rate of only 6%.
Patients with cancer often want to know how long they have left to live and it’s the first question patients ask after diagnosis.
Reliable predictions are very important for achieving more personalized care and better management.
However, the accuracy of physicians' clinical predictions of survival is poor.
Predicting pancreatic cancer survival is challenging due to different tumor characteristics, treatments and patient populations.
In this study, we evaluate the performance of Machine Learning (ML) in survival prediction compared to TNM system and published nomograms.
Methods: Pancreatic cancer patients were identified through the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (SEER).
Clinical data of the patients were extracted including: age, sex, race, marital status, tumor site, tumor histology, grade, tumor size, extension, Lymph Node (L.
N) involvement, metastasis, cancer sequence, TNM stage, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, examined (L.
N), positive (L.
N) and survival months.
Patients’ records were randomly divided into a training set (80%) and a validation set (20%).
ML algorithms were tested to predict survival at 6, 12 and 24 months as well as TNM staging system and two nomograms.
Results: A total number of 22,700 patients were identified through SEER from 2004 – 2013 with median survival of 12 months.
The most common primary sites were head of pancreas (62.
8%), tail (13.
2%), and body (10.
7%).
Random Forests algorithm achieved better results compared to other models.
The trained model yielded Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUCs) of 86.
6% at 6 months, 83.
4% at 12 months and 82.
2% at 24 months.
Compared to TNM staging system which achieved AUCs of 66.
6% at 6 months, 65.
5% at 12 months and 57% at 24 months.
The nomograms achieved AUCs of 71.
1% and 55.
2% in predicting 1-year-survival.
Sensitivity of the trained model were 80%, 75% and 79% at 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively.
The most important characteristics which influenced the model prediction performance were: age at diagnosis, surgery and tumor size.
Conclusion: Machine learning achieved a much better performance compared to TNM staging system and prognostic nomograms.
Improved survival prediction can help in in making better treatment decisions and planning social and care needs.
Citation Format: Mohamed H.
Osman.
Pancreatic cancer survival prediction using machine learning and comparing its performance with TNM staging system and prognostic nomograms [abstract].
In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA.
Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1644.

Related Results

Abstract IA-08: Clinical advances in pancreas adenocarcinoma
Abstract IA-08: Clinical advances in pancreas adenocarcinoma
Abstract Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal cancers today and is expected to be the second cause of cancer death in the coming decade. M...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Selection of Injectable Drug Product Composition using Machine Learning Models (Preprint)
Selection of Injectable Drug Product Composition using Machine Learning Models (Preprint)
BACKGROUND As of July 2020, a Web of Science search of “machine learning (ML)” nested within the search of “pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics” yielded over 100...
Abstract LB-80: Building Bridges for Pancreatic Cancer Research
Abstract LB-80: Building Bridges for Pancreatic Cancer Research
Abstract Almost 40 years after President Nixon signed into law the National Cancer Act, the survival rate for pancreatic cancer has not substantially improved. Today...
Abstract 6262: Optimal cut-off age for AJCC staging system in Middle Eastern patients with differentiated thyroid cancer
Abstract 6262: Optimal cut-off age for AJCC staging system in Middle Eastern patients with differentiated thyroid cancer
Abstract Background: Differentiated Thyroid Cancer (DTC) has an indolent nature and generally has favorable prognosis. AJCC TNM classification is the most adopted sy...
Survival nomograms for stage III colorectal cancer
Survival nomograms for stage III colorectal cancer
Abstract The postoperative survival of patients with stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) various obviously. We sought to develop novel nomograms for predicting the surviv...

Back to Top