Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Regulators Of G‐Protein Signaling 2 And 4 Differentially Regulate the Rewarding Effects of Nicotine and Cocaine
View through CrossRef
Addiction to nicotine and cocaine is a major cause of preventable premature morbidity and mortality. The reinforcing effects of nicotine and cocaine are primarily mediated by increasing dopamine in the mesolimbic reward pathway. The effects of neurotransmitters like dopamine in this pathway are mediated by G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs). Interestingly, regulator of G protein‐signaling (RGS) proteins negatively regulate the functioning of GPCRs. In this study we specifically focused on the role of RGS2 and RGS4, which are extensively distributed in the mesolimbic reward pathway. This study evaluated the effects of RGS2 and RGS4 in the rewarding effects of nicotine (0.5 mg/kg; s.c.; base) and cocaine (15 mg/kg; i.p.) using conditioned place preference procedure (CPP) in mice lacking either RGS2 (i.e. RGS2 KO) or RGS4 (RGS4 KO) and their wildtype counterparts. Because a role of sex has been reported in the effects mediated by different RGS proteins, both male and female mice lacking either RGS2 or RGS4 were studied while assessing the rewarding effects of cocaine and nicotine. Cocaine and nicotine‐induced CPP was observed in all wildtype mice irrespective of genotype and sex. Cocaine‐induced rewarding effects were attenuated in male RGS4 KO mice, but not male RGS2 KO mice compared to respective saline controls. In contrast, nicotine‐induced rewarding effects were attenuated in male RGS2 KO mice, but not in male RGS4 KO mice compared to respective saline controls. Interestingly, knockout of either RGS2 or RGS4 in female mice had no effect on nicotine or cocaine‐induced rewarding effects, respectively. Thus, these data suggest both genotype and sex‐dependent differential effects of RGS2 and RGS4 in the rewarding effects of nicotine and cocaine. Clinically, the data support a role for targeting RGS2 and RGS4 for the treatment nicotine and cocaine addiction, respectively.
Support or Funding Information
This work was supported by a Bower, Bennett and Bennett grant awarded to Dr. Manoranjan S. D’Souza by the Raabe College of Pharmacy, Ohio Northern University (ONU), Ada, Ohio.
Title: Regulators Of G‐Protein Signaling 2 And 4 Differentially Regulate the Rewarding Effects of Nicotine and Cocaine
Description:
Addiction to nicotine and cocaine is a major cause of preventable premature morbidity and mortality.
The reinforcing effects of nicotine and cocaine are primarily mediated by increasing dopamine in the mesolimbic reward pathway.
The effects of neurotransmitters like dopamine in this pathway are mediated by G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs).
Interestingly, regulator of G protein‐signaling (RGS) proteins negatively regulate the functioning of GPCRs.
In this study we specifically focused on the role of RGS2 and RGS4, which are extensively distributed in the mesolimbic reward pathway.
This study evaluated the effects of RGS2 and RGS4 in the rewarding effects of nicotine (0.
5 mg/kg; s.
c.
; base) and cocaine (15 mg/kg; i.
p.
) using conditioned place preference procedure (CPP) in mice lacking either RGS2 (i.
e.
RGS2 KO) or RGS4 (RGS4 KO) and their wildtype counterparts.
Because a role of sex has been reported in the effects mediated by different RGS proteins, both male and female mice lacking either RGS2 or RGS4 were studied while assessing the rewarding effects of cocaine and nicotine.
Cocaine and nicotine‐induced CPP was observed in all wildtype mice irrespective of genotype and sex.
Cocaine‐induced rewarding effects were attenuated in male RGS4 KO mice, but not male RGS2 KO mice compared to respective saline controls.
In contrast, nicotine‐induced rewarding effects were attenuated in male RGS2 KO mice, but not in male RGS4 KO mice compared to respective saline controls.
Interestingly, knockout of either RGS2 or RGS4 in female mice had no effect on nicotine or cocaine‐induced rewarding effects, respectively.
Thus, these data suggest both genotype and sex‐dependent differential effects of RGS2 and RGS4 in the rewarding effects of nicotine and cocaine.
Clinically, the data support a role for targeting RGS2 and RGS4 for the treatment nicotine and cocaine addiction, respectively.
Support or Funding Information
This work was supported by a Bower, Bennett and Bennett grant awarded to Dr.
Manoranjan S.
D’Souza by the Raabe College of Pharmacy, Ohio Northern University (ONU), Ada, Ohio.
Related Results
Vascular Consequences of Cocaine Exposure.
Vascular Consequences of Cocaine Exposure.
Abstract
Cocaine use is associated with sudden cardiac death, cardiac ischemia, and stroke in patients with no additional risk factors and is a frequent cause of the...
Plasma Nicotine Pharmacokinetics of Oral Nicotine Pouches Across Varying Flavours and Nicotine Content *
Plasma Nicotine Pharmacokinetics of Oral Nicotine Pouches Across Varying Flavours and Nicotine Content *
SUMMARY
Background
In recent years several nicotine products have been introduced that aim to offer smokers an alternativ...
Cocaine-induced DNA-PK relieves RNAP II pausing by promoting TRIM28 phosphorylation
Cocaine-induced DNA-PK relieves RNAP II pausing by promoting TRIM28 phosphorylation
AbstractDrug abuse continues to pose a significant challenge in HIV control efforts. In our investigation, we discovered that cocaine not only upregulates the expression of DNA-dep...
The Transfer of Nicotine from Nicotine Salts to Mainstream Smoke
The Transfer of Nicotine from Nicotine Salts to Mainstream Smoke
Abstract
Transfer of nicotine to mainstream smoke was measured for Reference cigarettes made with the addition of 20 -40 mg of seven different nicotine salts, d- and...
Identification and Quantitation of Nicotine Polacrilex in Nicotine Pouches and Other Oral Nicotine Delivery Products
Identification and Quantitation of Nicotine Polacrilex in Nicotine Pouches and Other Oral Nicotine Delivery Products
SUMMARY
Nicotine polacrilex (CAS-No. 96055-45-7) can be used as the source of nicotine in nicotine pouches and other oral nicotine delivery p...
Rodent models for nicotine withdrawal
Rodent models for nicotine withdrawal
Background:
Animal models are critical to improve our understanding of the neuronal mechanisms underlying nicotine withdrawal. Nicotine dependence in rodents ca...
Literature Review on Nicotine’s Role in Human Health
Literature Review on Nicotine’s Role in Human Health
Summary
Background
Next generation of nicotine/tobacco products (NGPs) include electronic cigarettes (ECs), heated tobacc...
Adult consequences of repeated nicotine vapor inhalation in adolescent rats
Adult consequences of repeated nicotine vapor inhalation in adolescent rats
AbstractIntroductionThere has been a recent resurgence in nicotine inhalation in adolescents due to the popularity and availability of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS). ...

