Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Examination of homogeneity of selected Irish pooling groups
View through CrossRef
Abstract. In regional flood frequency estimation, a homogeneous pooling group of sites leads to a reduction in the error of quantile estimators which is the main aim of a regional flood frequency analysis. Examination of the homogeneity of regions/pooling groups is usually based on a statistic that relates to the formulation of a frequency distribution model, e.g. the coefficient of variation (Wiltshire, 1986; Fill and Stedinger, 1995) and/or skew coefficient, their L-moment equivalents (Chowdhury et al., 1991; Hosking and Wallis, 1997) or of dimensionless quantiles such as the 10-yr event (Dalrymple, 1960; Lu and Stedinger, 1992). Hosking andWallis (1993, 1997) proposed homogeneity tests based on L-moment ratios such as L-CV alone (H1) and L-CV & L-skewness jointly (H2) which were also recently investigated by Viglione et al. (2007). In this paper a study, based on annual maximum series obtained from 85 Irish gauging stations, examines how successful a common method of identifying pooling group membership is in selecting groups that actually are homogeneous. Each station has its own unique pooling group selected by use of a Euclidean distance measure in catchment descriptor space, commonly denoted dij and with a minimum of 500 station years of data in the pooling group, which satisfies the 5T rule (FEH, 1999, 3, p. 169) for the 100 yr quantile. It was found that dij could be effectively defined in terms of catchment area, mean rainfall and baseflow index. The sampling distribution of L-CV (t2) in each pooling group and the 95% confidence limits about the pooled estimate of t2 are obtained by simulation. The t2 values of the selected group members are compared with these confidence limits both graphically and numerically. Of the 85 stations, only 1 station's pooling group members have all their t2 values within the confidence limits, while 7, 33 and 44 of them have 1, 2 or 3 or more, t2 values outside the confidence limits. The outcomes are also compared with the heterogeneity measures H1 and H2. The H1 values show an upward trend with the ranges of t2 values in the pooling group whereas the H2 values do not show any such dependency. A selection of 27 pooling groups, found to be heterogeneous, were further examined with the help of box-plots of catchment descriptor values and one particular case is considered in detail. Overall the results show that even with a carefully considered selection procedure, it is not certain that perfectly homogeneous pooling groups are identified. As a compromise it is recommended that a group containing more than 2 values of t2 outside the confidence limits should not be considered homogeneous.
Title: Examination of homogeneity of selected Irish pooling groups
Description:
Abstract.
In regional flood frequency estimation, a homogeneous pooling group of sites leads to a reduction in the error of quantile estimators which is the main aim of a regional flood frequency analysis.
Examination of the homogeneity of regions/pooling groups is usually based on a statistic that relates to the formulation of a frequency distribution model, e.
g.
the coefficient of variation (Wiltshire, 1986; Fill and Stedinger, 1995) and/or skew coefficient, their L-moment equivalents (Chowdhury et al.
, 1991; Hosking and Wallis, 1997) or of dimensionless quantiles such as the 10-yr event (Dalrymple, 1960; Lu and Stedinger, 1992).
Hosking andWallis (1993, 1997) proposed homogeneity tests based on L-moment ratios such as L-CV alone (H1) and L-CV & L-skewness jointly (H2) which were also recently investigated by Viglione et al.
(2007).
In this paper a study, based on annual maximum series obtained from 85 Irish gauging stations, examines how successful a common method of identifying pooling group membership is in selecting groups that actually are homogeneous.
Each station has its own unique pooling group selected by use of a Euclidean distance measure in catchment descriptor space, commonly denoted dij and with a minimum of 500 station years of data in the pooling group, which satisfies the 5T rule (FEH, 1999, 3, p.
169) for the 100 yr quantile.
It was found that dij could be effectively defined in terms of catchment area, mean rainfall and baseflow index.
The sampling distribution of L-CV (t2) in each pooling group and the 95% confidence limits about the pooled estimate of t2 are obtained by simulation.
The t2 values of the selected group members are compared with these confidence limits both graphically and numerically.
Of the 85 stations, only 1 station's pooling group members have all their t2 values within the confidence limits, while 7, 33 and 44 of them have 1, 2 or 3 or more, t2 values outside the confidence limits.
The outcomes are also compared with the heterogeneity measures H1 and H2.
The H1 values show an upward trend with the ranges of t2 values in the pooling group whereas the H2 values do not show any such dependency.
A selection of 27 pooling groups, found to be heterogeneous, were further examined with the help of box-plots of catchment descriptor values and one particular case is considered in detail.
Overall the results show that even with a carefully considered selection procedure, it is not certain that perfectly homogeneous pooling groups are identified.
As a compromise it is recommended that a group containing more than 2 values of t2 outside the confidence limits should not be considered homogeneous.
Related Results
Pooling Operations in Deep Learning: From “Invariable” to “Variable”
Pooling Operations in Deep Learning: From “Invariable” to “Variable”
Deep learning has become a research hotspot in multimedia, especially in the field of image processing. Pooling operation is an important operation in deep learning. Pooling operat...
Irish Literature and the Union with Britain, 1801–1921
Irish Literature and the Union with Britain, 1801–1921
Studies of Romantic and Victorian literary culture often sideline Irish writing—not always out of Anglocentric prejudice, but also because Irish literature in those periods was fre...
Modern Interpretations of Irish Mythology
Modern Interpretations of Irish Mythology
Modern versions of Irish mythological tales circulated widely from the late nineteenth century and the early twentieth, a period sometimes termed the Irish Revival, the Irish Liter...
The 1916 Easter Rising
The 1916 Easter Rising
On Easter Monday, 24 April 1916, over one thousand Irish rebels occupied prominent buildings across Dublin, triggering a battle for control of what was then a major UK city. Confro...
FPGA implementation of AAD pooling unit and performance analysis
FPGA implementation of AAD pooling unit and performance analysis
Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) has been witnessing a massive growth for its various applications in different fields. It is a category of Neural Network or Deep learning that i...
Twenty-First-Century Irish Prose
Twenty-First-Century Irish Prose
In 2018, while serving as the second Laureate for Irish Fiction, the author Sebastian Barry proclaimed, “We are in an unexpected golden age of Irish prose writing” (Barry 2018, cit...
Children's Literature and Young Adult Literature in Ireland
Children's Literature and Young Adult Literature in Ireland
Irish children’s and young adult literature is a rich and complex field of inquiry. While the history of Irish children’s publishing can be traced to the eighteenth century, the em...

