Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Benchmarking Generative AI: A Call for Establishing a Comprehensive Framework and a Generative AIQ Test

View through CrossRef
The introduction and rapid evolution of generative artificial intelligence (genAI) models necessitates a refined understanding for the concept of “intelligence”. The genAI tools are known for its capability to produce complex, creative, and contextually relevant output. Nevertheless, the deployment of genAI models in healthcare should be accompanied appropriate and rigorous performance evaluation tools. In this rapid communication, we emphasizes the urgent need to develop a “Generative AIQ Test” as a novel tailored tool for comprehensive benchmarking of genAI models against multiple human-like intelligence attributes. A preliminary framework is proposed in this communication. This framework incorporates miscellaneous performance metrics including accuracy, diversity, novelty, and consistency. These metrics were considered critical in the evaluation of genAI models that might be utilized to generate diagnostic recommendations, treatment plans, and patient interaction suggestions. This communication also highlights the importance of orchestrated collaboration to construct robust and well-annotated benchmarking datasets to capture the complexity of diverse medical scenarios and patient demographics. This communication suggests an approach aiming to ensure that genAI models are effective, equitable, and transparent. To maximize the potential of genAI models in healthcare, it is important to establish rigorous, dynamic standards for its benchmarking. Consequently, this approach can help to improve clinical decision-making with enhancement in patient care, which will enhance the reliability of genAI applications in healthcare.
Title: Benchmarking Generative AI: A Call for Establishing a Comprehensive Framework and a Generative AIQ Test
Description:
The introduction and rapid evolution of generative artificial intelligence (genAI) models necessitates a refined understanding for the concept of “intelligence”.
The genAI tools are known for its capability to produce complex, creative, and contextually relevant output.
Nevertheless, the deployment of genAI models in healthcare should be accompanied appropriate and rigorous performance evaluation tools.
In this rapid communication, we emphasizes the urgent need to develop a “Generative AIQ Test” as a novel tailored tool for comprehensive benchmarking of genAI models against multiple human-like intelligence attributes.
A preliminary framework is proposed in this communication.
This framework incorporates miscellaneous performance metrics including accuracy, diversity, novelty, and consistency.
These metrics were considered critical in the evaluation of genAI models that might be utilized to generate diagnostic recommendations, treatment plans, and patient interaction suggestions.
This communication also highlights the importance of orchestrated collaboration to construct robust and well-annotated benchmarking datasets to capture the complexity of diverse medical scenarios and patient demographics.
This communication suggests an approach aiming to ensure that genAI models are effective, equitable, and transparent.
To maximize the potential of genAI models in healthcare, it is important to establish rigorous, dynamic standards for its benchmarking.
Consequently, this approach can help to improve clinical decision-making with enhancement in patient care, which will enhance the reliability of genAI applications in healthcare.

Related Results

Artificial Intelligence Quotient (AIQ)
Artificial Intelligence Quotient (AIQ)
We introduce the concept of Artificial Intelligence Quotient (AIQ)—defined as a person’s ability to use AI to perform a wide variety of tasks—and provide evidence for its existence...
Artificial Intelligence Quotient (AIQ)
Artificial Intelligence Quotient (AIQ)
We introduce the concept of Artificial Intelligence Quotient (AIQ)—defined as a person’s ability to use AI to perform a wide variety of tasks—and provide evidence for its existence...
Evolving benchmarking practices: a review for research perspectives
Evolving benchmarking practices: a review for research perspectives
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to review a major section of the literature on benchmarking practices in order to achieve better perspectives for emerging benchmarking research...
Perceptions about benchmarking best practices among French managers: an exploratory survey
Perceptions about benchmarking best practices among French managers: an exploratory survey
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to present a discussion on the most commonly accepted benchmarking norms in the USA, the lessons learned from benchmarking experiences and see h...
Improving SME logistics performance through benchmarking
Improving SME logistics performance through benchmarking
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss the applicability of current benchmarking proposals for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and to suggest a condensed process...
Barriers to internal benchmarking initiatives: an empirical investigation
Barriers to internal benchmarking initiatives: an empirical investigation
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to focus on the identification of barriers to the implementation of benchmarking initiatives. Managers have little guidance on strategies for su...
Provocative Tests in Diagnosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Narrative Review
Provocative Tests in Diagnosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Narrative Review
Abstract Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a group of conditions caused by the compression of the neurovascular bundle within the thoracic outlet. It is classified into three main ...
An optimisational model of benchmarking
An optimisational model of benchmarking
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to develop a quantitative methodology for benchmarking process which is simple, effective and efficient as a rejoinder to benchmarking detractor...

Back to Top