Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Application of the eHealth Literacy Model in Digital Health Interventions: Scoping Review (Preprint)

View through CrossRef
BACKGROUND Digital health interventions (DHIs) are increasingly being adopted globally to address various public health issues. DHIs can be categorized according to four main types of technology: mobile based, web based, telehealth, and electronic health records. In 2006, Norman and Skinner introduced the <i>eHealth literacy model</i>, encompassing six domains of skills and abilities (basic, health, information, scientific, media, and computer) needed to effectively understand, process, and act on health-related information. Little is known about whether these domains are assessed or accounted for in DHIs. OBJECTIVE This study aims to explore how DHIs assess and evaluate the eHealth literacy model, describe which health conditions are addressed, and which technologies are used. METHODS We conducted a scoping review of the literature on DHIs, based on randomized controlled trial design and reporting the assessment of any domain of the eHealth literacy model. MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched. A duplicate selection and data extraction process was performed; we charted the results according to the country of origin, health condition, technology used, and eHealth literacy domain. RESULTS We identified 131 unique DHIs conducted in 26 different countries between 2001 and 2020. Most DHIs were conducted in English-speaking countries (n=81, 61.8%), delivered via the web (n=68, 51.9%), and addressed issues related to noncommunicable diseases (n=57, 43.5%) or mental health (n=26, 19.8%). None of the interventions assessed all six domains of the eHealth literacy model. Most studies focused on the domain of health literacy (n=96, 73.2%), followed by digital (n=19, 14.5%), basic and media (n=4, 3%), and information and scientific literacy (n=1, 0.7%). Of the 131 studies, 7 (5.3%) studies covered both health and digital literacy. CONCLUSIONS Although many selected DHIs assessed health or digital literacy, no studies comprehensively evaluated all domains of the eHealth literacy model; this evidence might be overlooking important factors that can mediate or moderate the effects of these interventions. Future DHIs should comprehensively assess the eHealth literacy model while developing or evaluating interventions to understand how and why interventions can be effective.
Title: Application of the eHealth Literacy Model in Digital Health Interventions: Scoping Review (Preprint)
Description:
BACKGROUND Digital health interventions (DHIs) are increasingly being adopted globally to address various public health issues.
DHIs can be categorized according to four main types of technology: mobile based, web based, telehealth, and electronic health records.
In 2006, Norman and Skinner introduced the <i>eHealth literacy model</i>, encompassing six domains of skills and abilities (basic, health, information, scientific, media, and computer) needed to effectively understand, process, and act on health-related information.
Little is known about whether these domains are assessed or accounted for in DHIs.
OBJECTIVE This study aims to explore how DHIs assess and evaluate the eHealth literacy model, describe which health conditions are addressed, and which technologies are used.
METHODS We conducted a scoping review of the literature on DHIs, based on randomized controlled trial design and reporting the assessment of any domain of the eHealth literacy model.
MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched.
A duplicate selection and data extraction process was performed; we charted the results according to the country of origin, health condition, technology used, and eHealth literacy domain.
RESULTS We identified 131 unique DHIs conducted in 26 different countries between 2001 and 2020.
Most DHIs were conducted in English-speaking countries (n=81, 61.
8%), delivered via the web (n=68, 51.
9%), and addressed issues related to noncommunicable diseases (n=57, 43.
5%) or mental health (n=26, 19.
8%).
None of the interventions assessed all six domains of the eHealth literacy model.
Most studies focused on the domain of health literacy (n=96, 73.
2%), followed by digital (n=19, 14.
5%), basic and media (n=4, 3%), and information and scientific literacy (n=1, 0.
7%).
Of the 131 studies, 7 (5.
3%) studies covered both health and digital literacy.
CONCLUSIONS Although many selected DHIs assessed health or digital literacy, no studies comprehensively evaluated all domains of the eHealth literacy model; this evidence might be overlooking important factors that can mediate or moderate the effects of these interventions.
Future DHIs should comprehensively assess the eHealth literacy model while developing or evaluating interventions to understand how and why interventions can be effective.

Related Results

Social Media and eHealth Literacy Among Older Adults: Systematic Literature Review (Preprint)
Social Media and eHealth Literacy Among Older Adults: Systematic Literature Review (Preprint)
BACKGROUND The advent of social media has significantly transformed health communication and the health-related actions of older adults, offering both obsta...
Ehealth Communication
Ehealth Communication
Ehealth, also known as E-health, is a relatively new area of health communication inquiry that examines the development, implementation, and application of a broad range of evolvin...
Readiness and Acceptance of eHealth Services for Diabetes Care in the General Population: Cross-sectional Study
Readiness and Acceptance of eHealth Services for Diabetes Care in the General Population: Cross-sectional Study
Background Diabetes management is a growing health care challenge worldwide. eHealth can revolutionize diabetes care, the success of which depends on end user a...
Digital Mental Health Landscaping in Low- and Middle-Income Countries 
Digital Mental Health Landscaping in Low- and Middle-Income Countries 
Introduction The aim of this project was to map the landscape of who is doing what and where in digital mental health, and to pr...
Formative Evaluation of the Implementation of eHealth in the Philippines: A Qualitative Study
Formative Evaluation of the Implementation of eHealth in the Philippines: A Qualitative Study
Background and Objective. The utilization of information and communications technology (ICT) to support health, known as eHealth, is a crucial enabler of universal healthcare. It i...
Factors Influencing eHealth Literacy Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Preprint)
Factors Influencing eHealth Literacy Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Preprint)
BACKGROUND eHealth literacy has increasingly emerged as a critical determinant of health, highlighting the importance of identifying its influencing factors...
Factors Influencing eHealth Literacy Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Factors Influencing eHealth Literacy Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background eHealth literacy has increasingly emerged as a critical determinant of health, highlighting the importance of identifying its influencing factors; ho...

Back to Top