Javascript must be enabled to continue!
THE ANALYSIS OF THE AMBIVALENCE IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GONERIL AND REGAN, AND CORDELIA AND LEAR IN KING LEAR, THE TRAGEDY PLAY BY WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE
View through CrossRef
The paper aims to analyze the quality and nature of the ambivalence in the relationship between Regan and Goneril and, on the other hand, between Cordelia and Lear in the tragedy King Lear by William Shakespeare. Our major focus in on the first relationship. In this paper, we use graphs in accordance with the concept of presenting drama structures based on the idea of Franco Moretti. Since our intention is to point out the emotional nuances in the characters' relationships, in addition to the graphs that are in line with Moretti's distant reading, we also apply close reading and the psychoanalytic approach accompanied by the affective turn. The analysis confirmes the importance of the emotional nature and motivation in relationships between characters and the fact that we can and sometimes have to look for the causes for certain affective and emotional states in ahistorical situations. Also, the analysis shows that the visual presentation of the characters' relationships through nodes and edges can contribute to the recognition of emotional and verbal nuances in relationships, and sometimes nuances themselves opens the door for some new research, questions and discussions.
Title: THE ANALYSIS OF THE AMBIVALENCE IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GONERIL AND REGAN, AND CORDELIA AND LEAR IN KING LEAR, THE TRAGEDY PLAY BY WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE
Description:
The paper aims to analyze the quality and nature of the ambivalence in the relationship between Regan and Goneril and, on the other hand, between Cordelia and Lear in the tragedy King Lear by William Shakespeare.
Our major focus in on the first relationship.
In this paper, we use graphs in accordance with the concept of presenting drama structures based on the idea of Franco Moretti.
Since our intention is to point out the emotional nuances in the characters' relationships, in addition to the graphs that are in line with Moretti's distant reading, we also apply close reading and the psychoanalytic approach accompanied by the affective turn.
The analysis confirmes the importance of the emotional nature and motivation in relationships between characters and the fact that we can and sometimes have to look for the causes for certain affective and emotional states in ahistorical situations.
Also, the analysis shows that the visual presentation of the characters' relationships through nodes and edges can contribute to the recognition of emotional and verbal nuances in relationships, and sometimes nuances themselves opens the door for some new research, questions and discussions.
Related Results
Mirror of Lear: A Comparative Study of The Fool in King Lear and The Gravedigger’s Boy in Lear
Mirror of Lear: A Comparative Study of The Fool in King Lear and The Gravedigger’s Boy in Lear
<p>Adaptations of Shakespeare’s <em>King Lear </em>have always been extensively explored, especially Edward Bond’s <em>Lear.</em> Many researchers abo...
Contemporary Adaptations of King Lear: Power and Dramatic Space in William Shakespeare, Edward Bond and Elaine Feinstein
Contemporary Adaptations of King Lear: Power and Dramatic Space in William Shakespeare, Edward Bond and Elaine Feinstein
In his tragedy King Lear (1605) William Shakespeare explores the human psyche through a story of an old king who gives up his land to his two eldest daughters and finds himself for...
David Hart, The Beauty of the Infinite: A Response
David Hart, The Beauty of the Infinite: A Response
I dissent from Hart's project of a theological aesthetics by a hair's breadth: but that hair's breadth is tragedy. The Beauty of the Infinite is an excellent book, but it would be ...
Identity Recognition as a Tragic Flaw in King Lear by William Shakespeare: Application of Hegel’s Master-Slave Dialectic
Identity Recognition as a Tragic Flaw in King Lear by William Shakespeare: Application of Hegel’s Master-Slave Dialectic
According to several theories of recognition it has been established that an individual counts on the feedback of another to seek identity recognition. According to G.W.F. Hegel (1...
Twitter, King Lear, and the Freedom of Speech, by John Curtis, and Judicial Allusion as Ornament: A Response to John Curtis’s, ‘Twitter, King Lear, and the Freedom of Speech’ by Professor Gary Watt
Twitter, King Lear, and the Freedom of Speech, by John Curtis, and Judicial Allusion as Ornament: A Response to John Curtis’s, ‘Twitter, King Lear, and the Freedom of Speech’ by Professor Gary Watt
On 27 July 2012, in his judgment following ‘The Twitter Joke Trial’, the Lord Chief Justice of England & Wales quoted from King Lear (Folio). The trial was the first time a Br...
George III and the Other ‘Mad King’
George III and the Other ‘Mad King’
Abstract
A memorable scene in Alan Bennett’s The Madness of George III/King George sees George III discovered in a dramatic reading from King Lear. Though the sce...
Posthuman Lear
Posthuman Lear
Approaching King Lear from an eco-materialist perspective, Posthuman Lear examines how the shift in Shakespeare’s tragedy from court to stormy heath activates a different sense of ...
An Apology for Antony. Morality and Pathos in Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra
An Apology for Antony. Morality and Pathos in Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra
Taking off from a consideration of Antony and Cleopatra’s intermingling of pathetic and moral tragedy, the analysis proposed in the present essay demonstrates how the play’s peculi...

