Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Expanding a Geothermal Field Downwards. The Challenge of Drilling a Deep Well in the Hengill Area, SW Iceland.
View through CrossRef
<p><span>In 1986 a well, which was planned as a convetional production well in the Nesjavellir Field in the Hengill Area, SW Iceland, was unexpectedly drilled into a very hot formation at the depth of 2.1&#160;km. The measured temperature in the lowest part of the well was 380&#176;C, which was the upper range of the measuring tool used. Thus, the bottom-hole temperature was most probably higher. No one expected to hit such a hot body in this place and the well design was not appropriate to handle such high temperatures and resulting pressures. Thus, the lower parts of that well were closed off and it has since then been operated as a conventional geothermal well.</span></p><p><span>This incidence sparked the idea of drilling deeper into volcanic hydrothermal systems in Iceland in order to gain a better understanding of the roots of the geothermal systems and to be able to produce fluids with higher enthalpy. The Iceland Deep Drilling Project (IDDP) is supposed to realize that idea. The IDDP project is a consortium of domestic and international partners, both from industry and academia. The three power companies in Iceland, which operate power-production in volcanic geothermal fields (Landsvirkjun, HS-Orka, OR), committed themselves to drill one deep well each in a field of theirs. </span></p><p><span>To date two wells have been drilled in the IDDP project. The first one, IDDP-1, was drilled in the Krafla Field, N Iceland, which is operated by Landsvirkjun, and the second well, IDDP-2, was drilled in the Reykjanes Field, which is operated by HS-Orka. The original plan was to drill down to 4-5 km. However, the IDDP-1 in Krafla was drilled into magma of rhyolite composition at the depth of 2.1 km and could therefore not be drilled further. During flow tests, it was flowing superheated steam at high pressure at well head temperature of 450&#176;C. The power capacity was estimated to be 36 MW<sub>e</sub>. However, due to hostile chemistry of the fluid and damaged casing, the well had to be abandoned and closed after the well tests. IDDP-2 was drilled down to 4,659 m. The highest temperature measured in the bottom of the well was 426&#176;C at a pressure of 340 bar. It was also possible to obtain core samples from the bottom of the well. However, due to damaged casing it hasn't been possible to do further temperature and pressure measurements in the lower parts of IDDP-2. To date flow tests in IDDP-2 have not started.</span></p><p><span>The next well in the IDDP project is planned in the Hengill Area. The most promising target is the hot body that started it all in the Nesjavellir Field. According to experience from IDDP-1 and IDDP-2 the main techincal obstacle is the casing. Both wells have serious casing problems. The magma body unexpectedly hit by IDDP-1 illustrated that careful interdisciplinary preperations are needed when drilling into the unknown. Currently, few projects are ongoing to fill the knowledge gaps in order to minimize risk and maximize the probability of successful drilling. </span></p>
Title: Expanding a Geothermal Field Downwards. The Challenge of Drilling a Deep Well in the Hengill Area, SW Iceland.
Description:
<p><span>In 1986 a well, which was planned as a convetional production well in the Nesjavellir Field in the Hengill Area, SW Iceland, was unexpectedly drilled into a very hot formation at the depth of 2.
1&#160;km.
The measured temperature in the lowest part of the well was 380&#176;C, which was the upper range of the measuring tool used.
Thus, the bottom-hole temperature was most probably higher.
No one expected to hit such a hot body in this place and the well design was not appropriate to handle such high temperatures and resulting pressures.
Thus, the lower parts of that well were closed off and it has since then been operated as a conventional geothermal well.
</span></p><p><span>This incidence sparked the idea of drilling deeper into volcanic hydrothermal systems in Iceland in order to gain a better understanding of the roots of the geothermal systems and to be able to produce fluids with higher enthalpy.
The Iceland Deep Drilling Project (IDDP) is supposed to realize that idea.
The IDDP project is a consortium of domestic and international partners, both from industry and academia.
The three power companies in Iceland, which operate power-production in volcanic geothermal fields (Landsvirkjun, HS-Orka, OR), committed themselves to drill one deep well each in a field of theirs.
</span></p><p><span>To date two wells have been drilled in the IDDP project.
The first one, IDDP-1, was drilled in the Krafla Field, N Iceland, which is operated by Landsvirkjun, and the second well, IDDP-2, was drilled in the Reykjanes Field, which is operated by HS-Orka.
The original plan was to drill down to 4-5 km.
However, the IDDP-1 in Krafla was drilled into magma of rhyolite composition at the depth of 2.
1 km and could therefore not be drilled further.
During flow tests, it was flowing superheated steam at high pressure at well head temperature of 450&#176;C.
The power capacity was estimated to be 36 MW<sub>e</sub>.
However, due to hostile chemistry of the fluid and damaged casing, the well had to be abandoned and closed after the well tests.
IDDP-2 was drilled down to 4,659 m.
The highest temperature measured in the bottom of the well was 426&#176;C at a pressure of 340 bar.
It was also possible to obtain core samples from the bottom of the well.
However, due to damaged casing it hasn't been possible to do further temperature and pressure measurements in the lower parts of IDDP-2.
To date flow tests in IDDP-2 have not started.
</span></p><p><span>The next well in the IDDP project is planned in the Hengill Area.
The most promising target is the hot body that started it all in the Nesjavellir Field.
According to experience from IDDP-1 and IDDP-2 the main techincal obstacle is the casing.
Both wells have serious casing problems.
The magma body unexpectedly hit by IDDP-1 illustrated that careful interdisciplinary preperations are needed when drilling into the unknown.
Currently, few projects are ongoing to fill the knowledge gaps in order to minimize risk and maximize the probability of successful drilling.
</span></p>.
Related Results
Study on Chemical Genesis of Deep Geothermal Fluid in Gaoyang Geothermal Field
Study on Chemical Genesis of Deep Geothermal Fluid in Gaoyang Geothermal Field
Geothermal resources are clean energy with a great potential for development and utilization. Gaoyang geothermal field, located in the middle of the raised area in Hebei province, ...
Genesis Mechanism and Resource Evaluation of Low-Temperature Hydrothermal Geothermal Fields in Wenquan County, Xinjiang
Genesis Mechanism and Resource Evaluation of Low-Temperature Hydrothermal Geothermal Fields in Wenquan County, Xinjiang
Abstract
The Wenquan County area in Xinjiang has a large number of hot springs and rich geothermal resources, with high potential for geothermal resource development and ut...
Introduction to the geothermal play and reservoir geology of the Netherlands
Introduction to the geothermal play and reservoir geology of the Netherlands
Abstract
The Netherlands has ample geothermal resources. During the last decade, development of these resources has picked up fast. In 2007 one geothermal system had been realis...
Geothermal Energy Production in Venezuela: Challenges and Opportunities
Geothermal Energy Production in Venezuela: Challenges and Opportunities
Abstract
Geothermal energy is a useful source for the generation of electricity, heat, cooling, mineral extraction, oxygen, and hydrogen. For several decades, Venezu...
Pit Less Drilling Significantly Reduces Wells Environmental Footprint
Pit Less Drilling Significantly Reduces Wells Environmental Footprint
Abstract
Pit less Drilling technology is a technology that eliminates the requirement for earthen pits or sumps to capture waste fluid. In this paper we will examine...
Geothermal Resource Evaluation Based on Geological Modeling in Fushan Sag, Beibuwan Basin
Geothermal Resource Evaluation Based on Geological Modeling in Fushan Sag, Beibuwan Basin
ABSTRACT:
Fushan Sag is in the south of Beibuwan Basin, with rich geothermal resources and large development potential. Based on the regional geological backgroun...
Icelandic Geothermal Energy: Shifting Ground
Icelandic Geothermal Energy: Shifting Ground
Today’s energy sectors hold different potentials for saving on energy, carbon, and other greenhouse gases (GHGs). Buildings, for instance, represent more than 40% of energy use wor...
Application of Innovative High Temperature Deep Pyrolysis Technology to Treat Drilling Cuttings Harmlessly in Tarim Basim
Application of Innovative High Temperature Deep Pyrolysis Technology to Treat Drilling Cuttings Harmlessly in Tarim Basim
Abstract
Due to high temperature, high pressure, and gypsum-salt formations in the Tian Mountain Front Block in Tarim Basin, the stability and rheology of traditiona...

