Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Assessment of cytologic differentiation in high‐grade pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A multi‐institutional study

View through CrossRef
BACKGROUNDWell‐differentiated (WD) and poorly differentiated (PD) pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are biologically distinct entities with different therapies and prognoses. WD neoplasms with elevated proliferation (Ki‐67 > 20%) have been shown to have an overlapping histology with PD neuroendocrine carcinomas. This study compared expert cytomorphologic assessments of differentiation in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms in a multi‐institutional study.METHODSFine‐needle aspiration specimens from pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (grade 2 [G2] and grade 3 [G3] according to the 2017 World Health Organization classification; n = 72) were diagnosed independently by 3 cytopathologists as WD or PD (poorly differentiated large cell type [PD‐L] or poorly differentiated small cell type [PD‐S]) purely on the basis of cytomorphology. Their diagnoses were compared with a final classification supported by immunohistochemistry (retinoblastoma (RB), death domain‐ associated protein (DAXX), and α thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X‐linked (ATRX) protein expression), targeted mutation analysis (Memorial Sloan Kettering–Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets), prior history of G1/G2 histology, and consensus.RESULTSThe rate of agreement on differentiation was 38% (15 WD cases and 12 PD cases) for the 70 cases included (55 WD cases [n = 19 G2, n = 31 G3, and n = 5 could not be graded] and 15 PD cases [n = 6 PD‐S, n = 6 PD‐L, and n = 3 PD, not otherwise specified). Two cases could not be classified by the employed methods. PD carcinomas had a higher rate of agreement (10 of 15 [67%]) than WD neoplasms (15 of 55 [27%]). Round nuclei and plasmacytoid cells were associated with agreement for WD cases, whereas apoptosis and angulated nuclei were associated with disagreement. Necrosis was associated with agreement for PD cases.CONCLUSIONSA purely morphologic approach to the distinction between G2 and G3 pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms based on cytology can be challenging, with disagreement found among experienced cytopathologists. Cancer Cytopathol 2018;126:44‐53. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Title: Assessment of cytologic differentiation in high‐grade pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A multi‐institutional study
Description:
BACKGROUNDWell‐differentiated (WD) and poorly differentiated (PD) pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are biologically distinct entities with different therapies and prognoses.
WD neoplasms with elevated proliferation (Ki‐67 > 20%) have been shown to have an overlapping histology with PD neuroendocrine carcinomas.
This study compared expert cytomorphologic assessments of differentiation in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms in a multi‐institutional study.
METHODSFine‐needle aspiration specimens from pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (grade 2 [G2] and grade 3 [G3] according to the 2017 World Health Organization classification; n = 72) were diagnosed independently by 3 cytopathologists as WD or PD (poorly differentiated large cell type [PD‐L] or poorly differentiated small cell type [PD‐S]) purely on the basis of cytomorphology.
Their diagnoses were compared with a final classification supported by immunohistochemistry (retinoblastoma (RB), death domain‐ associated protein (DAXX), and α thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X‐linked (ATRX) protein expression), targeted mutation analysis (Memorial Sloan Kettering–Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets), prior history of G1/G2 histology, and consensus.
RESULTSThe rate of agreement on differentiation was 38% (15 WD cases and 12 PD cases) for the 70 cases included (55 WD cases [n = 19 G2, n = 31 G3, and n = 5 could not be graded] and 15 PD cases [n = 6 PD‐S, n = 6 PD‐L, and n = 3 PD, not otherwise specified).
Two cases could not be classified by the employed methods.
PD carcinomas had a higher rate of agreement (10 of 15 [67%]) than WD neoplasms (15 of 55 [27%]).
Round nuclei and plasmacytoid cells were associated with agreement for WD cases, whereas apoptosis and angulated nuclei were associated with disagreement.
Necrosis was associated with agreement for PD cases.
CONCLUSIONSA purely morphologic approach to the distinction between G2 and G3 pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms based on cytology can be challenging, with disagreement found among experienced cytopathologists.
Cancer Cytopathol 2018;126:44‐53.
© 2017 American Cancer Society.

Related Results

Well differentiated grade 3 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors compared with related neoplasms: A morphologic study
Well differentiated grade 3 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors compared with related neoplasms: A morphologic study
BACKGROUNDPancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms with a Ki‐67 labeling index greater than 20% were reclassified in 2017 by the World Health Organization into well differentiated (WD) ...
Data from Bacterial Vaginosis Decreases the Risk of Cervical Cytological Abnormalities
Data from Bacterial Vaginosis Decreases the Risk of Cervical Cytological Abnormalities
<div>Abstract<p>Genital tract infections, including vulvovaginal candidiasis and bacterial vaginosis, have emerged as potential modulators of persistent human papilloma...
Data from Bacterial Vaginosis Decreases the Risk of Cervical Cytological Abnormalities
Data from Bacterial Vaginosis Decreases the Risk of Cervical Cytological Abnormalities
<div>Abstract<p>Genital tract infections, including vulvovaginal candidiasis and bacterial vaginosis, have emerged as potential modulators of persistent human papilloma...
Epidemiological profile of central nervous system neoplasms in the last decade
Epidemiological profile of central nervous system neoplasms in the last decade
Background: The epidemiological profile is one of the fundamental pillars of public health as it offers a detailed view of the health condition of a population. It is observed that...
Draft Recommendations on Classification of Rodent Neoplasms for Peto Analysis
Draft Recommendations on Classification of Rodent Neoplasms for Peto Analysis
The Executive Committee of the Society of Toxicologic Pathology appointed an ad hoc working group to review the current use of the Peto model for statistical analysis of rodent car...
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
[68Ga]-DOTATOC PET/CT Volumetric Parameters Reflect Metastatic Potential in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
[68Ga]-DOTATOC PET/CT Volumetric Parameters Reflect Metastatic Potential in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
Background: [68Ga]-DOTATOC PET/CT is a valuable technique for identifying neuroendocrine tumors overexpressing somatostatin receptors; however, its diagnostic and prognostic utilit...
INSM1 expression in neuroendocrine tumors in a tertiary care hospital
INSM1 expression in neuroendocrine tumors in a tertiary care hospital
ABSTRACT Aim: Neuroendocrine tumors are heterogenous group of neoplasms that includes benign and malignant tumors that originate from neuroendocr...

Back to Top