Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Decentralized decision‐making technique for dynamic coalition of resource‐bounded autonomous agents

View through CrossRef
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to extend the existing approaches of coalition formation to how to adapt dynamically the size of the coalition according to the complexity of the task to be accomplished.Design/methodology/approachA considerable amount of attention has been paid to the coalition formation problem to deal efficiently with tasks needing more than one agent (i.e. robot). However, little attention has been paid to the problem of monitoring a coalition during the execution by modifying it according to the progress of the accomplishment of the task. In this paper, the authors consider a coalition of resource‐bounded autonomous agents with anytime behavior solving a common complex task. There is no central control component. Agents can observe the effect of the other agents' actions. They can decide whether they should continue to contribute in solving the common task or to stop their contribution and to leave the coalition. This decision is made in a distributed way. The objective is to avoid the waste of resources and time by using the same coalition along the task accomplishment while some agents become unnecessary to pursue the accomplishment of the task. The authors formalize this decentralized decision‐making problem as a decentralized Markov decision process (DEC‐MDP).FindingsThe paper results in a framework leading to Coal‐DEC‐MDP, which allows each agent to decide whether to stay in the coalition or leave it by estimating the progress on the task accomplishment.Research limitations/implicationsThe approach could be extended to deal with more than one coalition.Practical implicationsDecentralized control of a fleet of robots accomplishing a mission.Originality/valueThe paper deals with a new problem of adapting dynamically the coalition to the target task and the use of DEC‐MDPs.
Title: Decentralized decision‐making technique for dynamic coalition of resource‐bounded autonomous agents
Description:
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to extend the existing approaches of coalition formation to how to adapt dynamically the size of the coalition according to the complexity of the task to be accomplished.
Design/methodology/approachA considerable amount of attention has been paid to the coalition formation problem to deal efficiently with tasks needing more than one agent (i.
e.
robot).
However, little attention has been paid to the problem of monitoring a coalition during the execution by modifying it according to the progress of the accomplishment of the task.
In this paper, the authors consider a coalition of resource‐bounded autonomous agents with anytime behavior solving a common complex task.
There is no central control component.
Agents can observe the effect of the other agents' actions.
They can decide whether they should continue to contribute in solving the common task or to stop their contribution and to leave the coalition.
This decision is made in a distributed way.
The objective is to avoid the waste of resources and time by using the same coalition along the task accomplishment while some agents become unnecessary to pursue the accomplishment of the task.
The authors formalize this decentralized decision‐making problem as a decentralized Markov decision process (DEC‐MDP).
FindingsThe paper results in a framework leading to Coal‐DEC‐MDP, which allows each agent to decide whether to stay in the coalition or leave it by estimating the progress on the task accomplishment.
Research limitations/implicationsThe approach could be extended to deal with more than one coalition.
Practical implicationsDecentralized control of a fleet of robots accomplishing a mission.
Originality/valueThe paper deals with a new problem of adapting dynamically the coalition to the target task and the use of DEC‐MDPs.

Related Results

Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
The Coalition Life-cycle in Central Eastern Europe
The Coalition Life-cycle in Central Eastern Europe
This volume analyses the coalition life-cycle in ten countries in Central Eastern Europe, from pre-electoral alliances to government formation and portfolio distribution, to govern...
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
This report sets out the findings from one of four projects commissioned by Wellcome Policy Lab to pilot creative approaches to policy development. In this project, Scientia Script...
What Will the Law Do About Autonomous Vehicles?
What Will the Law Do About Autonomous Vehicles?
Autonomous vehicles are just beginning to emerge on roads and highways all over the world. The autonomous vehicle prototypes available now provide some clues to understanding how l...
Implikasi Pergeseran Sistem Politik terhadap Hukum dan Birokrasi di Indonesia
Implikasi Pergeseran Sistem Politik terhadap Hukum dan Birokrasi di Indonesia
Coalition can be the effective way to collect the power for struggle in the competitive politics. In Indonesia, after the reform era, the coalition system being the most popular sy...
Coalition Governance in Central Eastern Europe
Coalition Governance in Central Eastern Europe
Coalitions among political parties govern most of Europe’s parliamentary democracies. Traditionally, the study of coalition politics has been focused on Western Europe. Coalition g...
Sequentially Stable Coalition Structures
Sequentially Stable Coalition Structures
In this paper, we examine the question of which coalition structures farsighted players form in coalition formation games with externalities. We introduce a stability concept for a...
Principles of artificial intelligence in law
Principles of artificial intelligence in law
Problem setting. The technological advances we have seen in recent years have allowed autonomous AI systems to become increasingly complex. This offers great benefits for both indi...

Back to Top