Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Long-Axis In-Plane Approach Versus Short-Axis Out-of-Plane Approach for Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheterization in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial*
View through CrossRef
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to compare the occurrence of posterior wall puncture between the long-axis in-plane and the short-axis out-of-plane approaches in a randomized controlled trial of pediatric patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery under general anesthesia.
Design:
Prospective randomized controlled trial.
Setting:
Operating room of Osaka Women’s and Children’s Hospital.
Patients:
Pediatric patients less than 5 years old who underwent cardiovascular surgery.
Interventions:
Ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization using the long-axis in-plane approach and short-axis out-of-plane approach.
Measurements and Main Results:
The occurrence of posterior wall puncture was compared between the long-axis in-plane and short-axis out-of-plane approaches for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization. Patients were randomly allocated to a long-axis group or a short-axis group and underwent ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in the internal jugular vein using either the long-axis in-plane approach (long-axis group) or the short-axis out-of-plane approach (short-axis group). After exclusion, 97 patients were allocated to the long-axis (n = 49) or short-axis (n = 48) groups. Posterior wall puncture rates were 8.2% (4/49) and 39.6% (19/48) in the long-axis and short-axis groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.076–0.56; p = 0.0003). First attempt success rates were 67.3% (33/49) and 64.6% (31/48) in the long-axis and short-axis groups, respectively (relative risk, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.78–1.39; p = 0.77). Overall success rates within 20 minutes were 93.9% (46/49) and 93.8% (45/48) in the long-axis and short-axis groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.90–1.11; p = 0.98).
Conclusions:
The long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization is a useful technique for avoiding posterior wall puncture in pediatric patients, compared with the short-axis out-of-plane approach.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Long-Axis In-Plane Approach Versus Short-Axis Out-of-Plane Approach for Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheterization in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial*
Description:
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to compare the occurrence of posterior wall puncture between the long-axis in-plane and the short-axis out-of-plane approaches in a randomized controlled trial of pediatric patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery under general anesthesia.
Design:
Prospective randomized controlled trial.
Setting:
Operating room of Osaka Women’s and Children’s Hospital.
Patients:
Pediatric patients less than 5 years old who underwent cardiovascular surgery.
Interventions:
Ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization using the long-axis in-plane approach and short-axis out-of-plane approach.
Measurements and Main Results:
The occurrence of posterior wall puncture was compared between the long-axis in-plane and short-axis out-of-plane approaches for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization.
Patients were randomly allocated to a long-axis group or a short-axis group and underwent ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in the internal jugular vein using either the long-axis in-plane approach (long-axis group) or the short-axis out-of-plane approach (short-axis group).
After exclusion, 97 patients were allocated to the long-axis (n = 49) or short-axis (n = 48) groups.
Posterior wall puncture rates were 8.
2% (4/49) and 39.
6% (19/48) in the long-axis and short-axis groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.
21; 95% CI, 0.
076–0.
56; p = 0.
0003).
First attempt success rates were 67.
3% (33/49) and 64.
6% (31/48) in the long-axis and short-axis groups, respectively (relative risk, 1.
04; 95% CI, 0.
78–1.
39; p = 0.
77).
Overall success rates within 20 minutes were 93.
9% (46/49) and 93.
8% (45/48) in the long-axis and short-axis groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.
99; 95% CI, 0.
90–1.
11; p = 0.
98).
Conclusions:
The long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization is a useful technique for avoiding posterior wall puncture in pediatric patients, compared with the short-axis out-of-plane approach.
Related Results
Combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach versus long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in infants and small children: A randomized controlled trial
Combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach versus long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in infants and small children: A randomized controlled trial
The ultrasound-guided long-axis in-plane approach for central venous catheterization in infants and small children can prevent posterior wall penetration. The combined short-axis o...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a recently identified immune-mediated condition that is debilitating and often overlooked. While IgG4-RD has be...
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). Clinical trials...
The Pediatric Anesthesiology Workforce: Projecting Supply and Trends 2015–2035
The Pediatric Anesthesiology Workforce: Projecting Supply and Trends 2015–2035
BACKGROUND:
A workforce analysis was conducted to predict whether the projected future supply of pediatric anesthesiologists is balanced with the requirements o...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
The Geographic Distribution of Pediatric Anesthesiologists Relative to the US Pediatric Population
The Geographic Distribution of Pediatric Anesthesiologists Relative to the US Pediatric Population
BACKGROUND:
The geographic relationship between pediatric anesthesiologists and the pediatric population has potentially important clinical and policy implications. In ...
Arrhythmia Induced by Right Internal Jugular Vein Catheterization:A Case Report
Arrhythmia Induced by Right Internal Jugular Vein Catheterization:A Case Report
Abstract
Background
Central venous catheterization is crucial for managing critically ill patients, with common sites being the internal jugular, subclavian, and femoral ve...

