Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Long-Axis In-Plane Approach Versus Short-Axis Out-of-Plane Approach for Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheterization in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial*

View through CrossRef
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the occurrence of posterior wall puncture between the long-axis in-plane and the short-axis out-of-plane approaches in a randomized controlled trial of pediatric patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery under general anesthesia. Design: Prospective randomized controlled trial. Setting: Operating room of Osaka Women’s and Children’s Hospital. Patients: Pediatric patients less than 5 years old who underwent cardiovascular surgery. Interventions: Ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization using the long-axis in-plane approach and short-axis out-of-plane approach. Measurements and Main Results: The occurrence of posterior wall puncture was compared between the long-axis in-plane and short-axis out-of-plane approaches for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization. Patients were randomly allocated to a long-axis group or a short-axis group and underwent ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in the internal jugular vein using either the long-axis in-plane approach (long-axis group) or the short-axis out-of-plane approach (short-axis group). After exclusion, 97 patients were allocated to the long-axis (n = 49) or short-axis (n = 48) groups. Posterior wall puncture rates were 8.2% (4/49) and 39.6% (19/48) in the long-axis and short-axis groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.076–0.56; p = 0.0003). First attempt success rates were 67.3% (33/49) and 64.6% (31/48) in the long-axis and short-axis groups, respectively (relative risk, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.78–1.39; p = 0.77). Overall success rates within 20 minutes were 93.9% (46/49) and 93.8% (45/48) in the long-axis and short-axis groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.90–1.11; p = 0.98). Conclusions: The long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization is a useful technique for avoiding posterior wall puncture in pediatric patients, compared with the short-axis out-of-plane approach.
Title: Long-Axis In-Plane Approach Versus Short-Axis Out-of-Plane Approach for Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheterization in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial*
Description:
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the occurrence of posterior wall puncture between the long-axis in-plane and the short-axis out-of-plane approaches in a randomized controlled trial of pediatric patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery under general anesthesia.
Design: Prospective randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Operating room of Osaka Women’s and Children’s Hospital.
Patients: Pediatric patients less than 5 years old who underwent cardiovascular surgery.
Interventions: Ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization using the long-axis in-plane approach and short-axis out-of-plane approach.
Measurements and Main Results: The occurrence of posterior wall puncture was compared between the long-axis in-plane and short-axis out-of-plane approaches for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization.
Patients were randomly allocated to a long-axis group or a short-axis group and underwent ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in the internal jugular vein using either the long-axis in-plane approach (long-axis group) or the short-axis out-of-plane approach (short-axis group).
After exclusion, 97 patients were allocated to the long-axis (n = 49) or short-axis (n = 48) groups.
Posterior wall puncture rates were 8.
2% (4/49) and 39.
6% (19/48) in the long-axis and short-axis groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.
21; 95% CI, 0.
076–0.
56; p = 0.
0003).
First attempt success rates were 67.
3% (33/49) and 64.
6% (31/48) in the long-axis and short-axis groups, respectively (relative risk, 1.
04; 95% CI, 0.
78–1.
39; p = 0.
77).
Overall success rates within 20 minutes were 93.
9% (46/49) and 93.
8% (45/48) in the long-axis and short-axis groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.
99; 95% CI, 0.
90–1.
11; p = 0.
98).
Conclusions: The long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization is a useful technique for avoiding posterior wall puncture in pediatric patients, compared with the short-axis out-of-plane approach.

Related Results

Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract Introduction Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Impacto de los equipos hospitalarios multiprofesionales de acceso vascular guiado por ecografía
Impacto de los equipos hospitalarios multiprofesionales de acceso vascular guiado por ecografía
Introduction Vascular access is essential for administering intravenous therapies in both hospital and outpatient settings.The traditional technique, based on palpation and visuali...
Pediatric Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Single-Center Cohort Study of Clinical and Surgical Outcomes
Pediatric Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Single-Center Cohort Study of Clinical and Surgical Outcomes
Abstract Introduction: Pilonidal sinus disease is increasingly recognized in the pediatric population, yet evidence on its clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes in childre...
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a recently identified immune-mediated condition that is debilitating and often overlooked. While IgG4-RD has be...
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). Clinical trials...

Back to Top