Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Ingroup Categorization of Robots Is Affected by Self-Cognitions and Level of Anthropomorphism
View through CrossRef
Objective: The purpose of this work was to examine the relationship between self-concept and ingroup/outgroup categorization of robots.
Background: Social psychological literature can improve Human–Robot Interaction (HRI) through investigations about cultural differences, intergroup dynamics, and more. Parallel to human–human interaction, people categorize robots as ingroup (“my group”) or outgroup (“not my group”) based on a myriad of variables. They favor ingroup robots by viewing them as more positive and human-like versus outgroup robots or humans. Previous work has examined the effect of robot anthropomorphism (i.e., human-likeness) on this categorization process with diverse findings.
Method: Examining the self-concept via the two-baskets theory of self-cognitions, we compared the ingroup categorization of Humans, Machine-like robots, Medium Human-like robots, and High Human-like robots using a simple categorization task.
Results: Results indicate that robots and human are categorized to the ingroup correlating with the uncanny valley effect, with humans being most likely to the ingroup followed by Medium Human-like, Machine-like, and High Human-like.
Conclusions: Self-concept may not be as important for categorization as other factors; however, important categorization differences exist following the trend of the uncanny valley.
Application: Those who design and utilize robots should take categorization differences into consideration when designing robots for public interactions. Further, those who purchase robots for use should be careful to consider the implications of visual similarities to human beings to ensure optimal acceptance OSF: (
https://osf.io/x9rqn/?view_only=fd0894404e304422a6c77ccffa013bcd
).
Precis: Considering the uncanny valley, we examine the social categorization of humans and robots and the relation of this categorization to the self-concept in the form of self-cognitions. Results demonstrate important differences in the categorization of various types of human and robot images based strongly on the uncanny valley effect.
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Title: Ingroup Categorization of Robots Is Affected by Self-Cognitions and Level of Anthropomorphism
Description:
Objective: The purpose of this work was to examine the relationship between self-concept and ingroup/outgroup categorization of robots.
Background: Social psychological literature can improve Human–Robot Interaction (HRI) through investigations about cultural differences, intergroup dynamics, and more.
Parallel to human–human interaction, people categorize robots as ingroup (“my group”) or outgroup (“not my group”) based on a myriad of variables.
They favor ingroup robots by viewing them as more positive and human-like versus outgroup robots or humans.
Previous work has examined the effect of robot anthropomorphism (i.
e.
, human-likeness) on this categorization process with diverse findings.
Method: Examining the self-concept via the two-baskets theory of self-cognitions, we compared the ingroup categorization of Humans, Machine-like robots, Medium Human-like robots, and High Human-like robots using a simple categorization task.
Results: Results indicate that robots and human are categorized to the ingroup correlating with the uncanny valley effect, with humans being most likely to the ingroup followed by Medium Human-like, Machine-like, and High Human-like.
Conclusions: Self-concept may not be as important for categorization as other factors; however, important categorization differences exist following the trend of the uncanny valley.
Application: Those who design and utilize robots should take categorization differences into consideration when designing robots for public interactions.
Further, those who purchase robots for use should be careful to consider the implications of visual similarities to human beings to ensure optimal acceptance OSF: (
https://osf.
io/x9rqn/?view_only=fd0894404e304422a6c77ccffa013bcd
).
Precis: Considering the uncanny valley, we examine the social categorization of humans and robots and the relation of this categorization to the self-concept in the form of self-cognitions.
Results demonstrate important differences in the categorization of various types of human and robot images based strongly on the uncanny valley effect.
Related Results
Cooperative social robots: accompanying, guiding and interacting with people
Cooperative social robots: accompanying, guiding and interacting with people
The development of social robots capable of interacting with humans is one of the principal challenges in the field of robotics. More and more, robots are appearing in dynamic envi...
Foundations of ontology-based explainable robots
Foundations of ontology-based explainable robots
(English) A critical challenge in the design of robots that operate while interacting with humans is to ensure mutual understanding, which contributes to build reliable human-robot...
How Does Children’s Anthropomorphism of a Social Robot Develop Over Time? A Six-Wave Panel Study
How Does Children’s Anthropomorphism of a Social Robot Develop Over Time? A Six-Wave Panel Study
AbstractResearch on children’s anthropomorphism of social robots is mostly cross-sectional and based on a single measurement. However, because social robots are new type of technol...
The relationship between the self and the ingroup: When having a common conception helps 1The authors wish to thank Anne Maass, Luigi Castelli, Luciano Arcuri and Jeff Kiesner for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article.
The relationship between the self and the ingroup: When having a common conception helps 1The authors wish to thank Anne Maass, Luigi Castelli, Luciano Arcuri and Jeff Kiesner for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article.
Consistent with balance theory, it was predicted that a balance is reached when the self and the ingroup are perceived in a similar way, leading participants to more rapid judgment...
Like Me or Like Us
Like Me or Like Us
Research has shown abundant evidence for social projection, that is, the tendency to expect similarity between oneself and others ( Krueger, 1998a , 1998b ). This effect is stronge...
Texting with Humanlike Conversational Agents: Designing for Anthropomorphism
Texting with Humanlike Conversational Agents: Designing for Anthropomorphism
Conversational agents (CAs) are natural language user interfaces that emulate human-to-human communication. Because of this emulation, research on CAs is inseparably linked to ques...
Discrepancy in ingroup bias among different self‐construal individuals: The moderating role of group types
Discrepancy in ingroup bias among different self‐construal individuals: The moderating role of group types
Although ingroup bias is well confirmed in various groups, the extent of the bias is affected by culture. Using a point‐assignment task and implicit association task (IAT) paradigm...
Cosserat Rod Modeling of Continuum Robots : Application to Concentric Agonist-Antagonist Robots
Cosserat Rod Modeling of Continuum Robots : Application to Concentric Agonist-Antagonist Robots
Modélisation de Robots Continus par la Théorie de Cosserat : Application aux Robots Concentriques Agonistes-Antagonistes
La robotique médicale est, depuis une quara...

