Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Hyperarithmetical complexity of infinitary action logic with multiplexing

View through CrossRef
Abstract In 2023, Kuznetsov and Speranski introduced infinitary action logic with multiplexing $!^{m}\nabla \textrm{ACT}_{\omega }$ and proved that the derivability problem for it lies between the $\omega $ level and the $\omega ^{\omega }$ level of the hyperarithmetical hierarchy. We prove that this problem is $\varDelta ^{0}_{\omega ^{\omega }}$-complete under Turing reductions. Namely, we show that it is recursively isomorphic to the satisfaction predicate for computable infinitary formulas of rank less than $\omega ^{\omega }$ in the language of arithmetic. As a consequence we prove that the closure ordinal for $!^{m}\nabla \textrm{ACT}_{\omega }$ equals $\omega ^{\omega }$. We also prove that the fragment of $!^{m}\nabla \textrm{ACT}_{\omega }$ where Kleene star is not allowed to be in the scope of the subexponential is $\varDelta ^{0}_{\omega ^{\omega }}$-complete. Finally, we present a family of logics, which are fragments of $!^{m}\nabla \textrm{ACT}_{\omega }$, such that the complexity of the $k$-th logic lies between $\varDelta ^{0}_{\omega ^{k}}$ and $\varDelta ^{0}_{\omega ^{k+1}}$.
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: Hyperarithmetical complexity of infinitary action logic with multiplexing
Description:
Abstract In 2023, Kuznetsov and Speranski introduced infinitary action logic with multiplexing $!^{m}\nabla \textrm{ACT}_{\omega }$ and proved that the derivability problem for it lies between the $\omega $ level and the $\omega ^{\omega }$ level of the hyperarithmetical hierarchy.
We prove that this problem is $\varDelta ^{0}_{\omega ^{\omega }}$-complete under Turing reductions.
Namely, we show that it is recursively isomorphic to the satisfaction predicate for computable infinitary formulas of rank less than $\omega ^{\omega }$ in the language of arithmetic.
As a consequence we prove that the closure ordinal for $!^{m}\nabla \textrm{ACT}_{\omega }$ equals $\omega ^{\omega }$.
We also prove that the fragment of $!^{m}\nabla \textrm{ACT}_{\omega }$ where Kleene star is not allowed to be in the scope of the subexponential is $\varDelta ^{0}_{\omega ^{\omega }}$-complete.
Finally, we present a family of logics, which are fragments of $!^{m}\nabla \textrm{ACT}_{\omega }$, such that the complexity of the $k$-th logic lies between $\varDelta ^{0}_{\omega ^{k}}$ and $\varDelta ^{0}_{\omega ^{k+1}}$.

Related Results

Complexity Theory
Complexity Theory
The workshop Complexity Theory was organised by Joachim von zur Gathen (Bonn), Oded Goldreich (Rehovot), Claus-Peter Schnorr (Frankfurt), and Madhu Sudan ...
Linguistic Complexity
Linguistic Complexity
Linguistic complexity (or: language complexity, complexity in language) is a multifaceted and multidimensional research area that has been booming since the early 2000s. The curren...
Infinitary Combinatory Reduction Systems: Confluence
Infinitary Combinatory Reduction Systems: Confluence
We study confluence in the setting of higher-order infinitary rewriting, in particular for infinitary Combinatory Reduction Systems (iCRSs). We prove that fully-extended, orthogona...
Information Technology and the Complexity Cycle
Information Technology and the Complexity Cycle
Aim/Purpose: In this paper we propose a framework identifying many of the unintended consequences of information technology and posit that the increased complexity brought about by...
Rationality and Logic
Rationality and Logic
An argument that logic is intrinsically psychological and human psychology is intrinsically logical, and that the connection between human rationality and logic is both constitutiv...
Greek and Roman Logic
Greek and Roman Logic
In ancient philosophy, there is no discipline called “logic” in the contemporary sense of “the study of formally valid arguments.” Rather, once a subfield of philosophy comes to be...
Infinitary S5‐Epistemic Logic
Infinitary S5‐Epistemic Logic
AbstractIt is known that a theory in S5‐epistemic logic with several agents may have numerous models. This is because each such model specifies also what an agent knows about infin...
A logic of defeasible argumentation: Constructing arguments in justification logic
A logic of defeasible argumentation: Constructing arguments in justification logic
In the 1980s, Pollock’s work on default reasons started the quest in the AI community for a formal system of defeasible argumentation. The main goal of this paper is to provide a l...

Back to Top