Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Public Opinion of LGB Supreme Court Nominees

View through CrossRef
Recently, there has been an increase in political attention to the demographic characteristics of judicial nominees in the United States and how they can affect public opinion from judicial scholars. Particular emphasis has been placed on race and gender (i.e., male versus female), with comparatively less focus on the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) community. This paper uses a conjoint experiment to evaluate the relationship between public support and lesbian, gay, and bisexual Supreme Court nominees. The results show that the general public is less likely to support bisexual and gay nominees than straight ones. It also shows that when someone is gay (bisexual), they are more likely to support a nominee who is gay (bisexual) as well, along with a strong partisan divide in supporting gay (bisexual) nominees. These results have implications for shared descriptive representation, symbolic representation, and the support of judicial nominees.
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: Public Opinion of LGB Supreme Court Nominees
Description:
Recently, there has been an increase in political attention to the demographic characteristics of judicial nominees in the United States and how they can affect public opinion from judicial scholars.
Particular emphasis has been placed on race and gender (i.
e.
, male versus female), with comparatively less focus on the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) community.
This paper uses a conjoint experiment to evaluate the relationship between public support and lesbian, gay, and bisexual Supreme Court nominees.
The results show that the general public is less likely to support bisexual and gay nominees than straight ones.
It also shows that when someone is gay (bisexual), they are more likely to support a nominee who is gay (bisexual) as well, along with a strong partisan divide in supporting gay (bisexual) nominees.
These results have implications for shared descriptive representation, symbolic representation, and the support of judicial nominees.

Related Results

Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com Abstract Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
All‐Cause and Suicide Mortality Among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Veterans Who Utilize Care through the Veterans Health Administration
All‐Cause and Suicide Mortality Among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Veterans Who Utilize Care through the Veterans Health Administration
AbstractResearch ObjectiveLesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals have higher risk of suicide ideation and attempts than their heterosexual counterparts, but suicide data, and...
P–138 When is low quality really low? Should we transfer low-grade blastocysts?
P–138 When is low quality really low? Should we transfer low-grade blastocysts?
Abstract Study question What is the live birth rate after single, low-grade blastocyst (LGB) transfer? ...
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
The Constitutional Court received a total of 2,829 cases in 2022 alone. Among the decisions made by the Constitutional Court in 2022, this paper reviews major decisions centered on...
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash ABSTRACT In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Analysis of the Supreme Court Cases in 2022: The Law of Claims
Analysis of the Supreme Court Cases in 2022: The Law of Claims
In this paper, among the major precedents of the Supreme Court on civil matters in the year 2022, I analyzed the meaning and contents of 8 important decisions (focused on the claim...
National Judicial Commission In India: The New Challenge
National Judicial Commission In India: The New Challenge
Art. 50 of our constitution provide - separation of powers and independent judiciary (under directive principles) and Art. 13 of the Indian constitution provide vital power to amen...
To Ban or Not to Ban : The Supreme Court and Obscenity
To Ban or Not to Ban : The Supreme Court and Obscenity
Since 1957, the United States Supreme Court has exhibited a marked shift in its attitude toward freedom of expression. This shift may be directly attributed to changes in the Court...

Back to Top