Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Against Digital Constitutionalism
View through CrossRef
Digital Constitutionalism makes sense. We can all see the problem it tries to solve. And like many other ‘constitutionalisms’, Digital Constitutionalism is a project fuelled by the institutional hope of striking a power equilibrium between competing actors. In seeking this equilibrium in the digital realm, however, important assumptions are made and serious questions are being ignored or oversimplified. Firstly, Digital Constitutionalism ignores the material reality of digital technologies and their production logics thereby mistaking ‘objects’ with ‘subjects’. Secondly, Digital Constitutionalism’s myopic lenses -almost inevitably- lead to narrations of ‘constitutional moments’ in the digital world caused by digital powers and digital revolutions, separate from the histories of private corporations in the global stage. Finally, Digital Constitutionalism falsely implies the absence of law rather than its presence -or indeed irrelevance- as major contributing factors to this ‘constitutional crisis’. On this account, it seeks to respond to the ‘digital revolution’ with a ‘legal revolution’. But Digital Constitutionalism may come at the price of exerting disproportionate discursive power in the field of Law and Technology. In an attempt to revert these dynamics, this note invites legal scholars to look back to think differently, and to engage critically with the long evolution of legal regulation that has enabled the emergence of the corporate form and the consolidation of economic and political power on the global stage. This historicization, the note concludes, may ultimately lead us to turn inward and reflect on the role of legal experts and professionals in the consolidation of private power in the global political economy. It may even inspire us to break free from restraining mental maps and thinking patterns and to unlock novel intellectual and methodological pathways in the field of Law and Technology.And if it takes a Digital Constitutionalism to come to this, it will have been worth it.
Title: Against Digital Constitutionalism
Description:
Digital Constitutionalism makes sense.
We can all see the problem it tries to solve.
And like many other ‘constitutionalisms’, Digital Constitutionalism is a project fuelled by the institutional hope of striking a power equilibrium between competing actors.
In seeking this equilibrium in the digital realm, however, important assumptions are made and serious questions are being ignored or oversimplified.
Firstly, Digital Constitutionalism ignores the material reality of digital technologies and their production logics thereby mistaking ‘objects’ with ‘subjects’.
Secondly, Digital Constitutionalism’s myopic lenses -almost inevitably- lead to narrations of ‘constitutional moments’ in the digital world caused by digital powers and digital revolutions, separate from the histories of private corporations in the global stage.
Finally, Digital Constitutionalism falsely implies the absence of law rather than its presence -or indeed irrelevance- as major contributing factors to this ‘constitutional crisis’.
On this account, it seeks to respond to the ‘digital revolution’ with a ‘legal revolution’.
But Digital Constitutionalism may come at the price of exerting disproportionate discursive power in the field of Law and Technology.
In an attempt to revert these dynamics, this note invites legal scholars to look back to think differently, and to engage critically with the long evolution of legal regulation that has enabled the emergence of the corporate form and the consolidation of economic and political power on the global stage.
This historicization, the note concludes, may ultimately lead us to turn inward and reflect on the role of legal experts and professionals in the consolidation of private power in the global political economy.
It may even inspire us to break free from restraining mental maps and thinking patterns and to unlock novel intellectual and methodological pathways in the field of Law and Technology.
And if it takes a Digital Constitutionalism to come to this, it will have been worth it.
Related Results
Trends in Modern Ukrainian Constitutionalism in the Context of Globalisation
Trends in Modern Ukrainian Constitutionalism in the Context of Globalisation
Constitutionalism is the most progressive political and legal system, which is substantively and functionally adapted to the effective development of Ukraine as a democratic, rule-...
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
Reflection on Indian and Australian Constitutionalism
Reflection on Indian and Australian Constitutionalism
Every country has its own Constitution but it does not imply that Constitutionalism is also flourishing there. The term constitution and constitutionalism reflects two different me...
Access Denied
Access Denied
Introduction
As social-distancing mandates in response to COVID-19 restricted in-person data collection methods such as participant observation and interviews, researchers turned t...
Reimagining digital constitutionalism
Reimagining digital constitutionalism
Abstract
Digital constitutionalism has been in vogue in recent years. A series of journal articles, edited collections and monographs that front the catch term ha...
Democratic constitutional crowdsourcing and models of digital constitutionalism for public legal communication and constitutional changes
Democratic constitutional crowdsourcing and models of digital constitutionalism for public legal communication and constitutional changes
The article discusses the theoretical foundations and applied aspects of democratic constitutionalism; democratic constitutional crowdsourcing and constitutional inclusion in the i...
Living Constitutionalism, Originalism, and the Sixteenth Amendment
Living Constitutionalism, Originalism, and the Sixteenth Amendment
The Supreme Court’s embrace of living constitutionalism in tax jurisprudence may allow it to avoid building the tax base on constitutional quicksand. In Moore v. United States, the...
Digital Constitutionalism and Consumer Protection
Digital Constitutionalism and Consumer Protection
Abstract
Digital constitutionalism has traditionally focused on limiting private power in the digital realm in a constitutionalist manner, focusing on the public ...