Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Combined Anterior–Posterior versus Posterior-Only Fixation of Stress-Positive Minimally Displaced Lateral Compression Type 1 (LC1) Pelvic Ring Injuries

View through CrossRef
Objectives: To compare hospital outcomes and late displacement between stress-positive minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries treated with combined anterior–posterior versus posterior-only fixation. Design: Retrospective comparative cohort. Setting: Urban level-one trauma center. Patients/Participants: LC1 injuries managed operatively. Intervention: Anterior–posterior versus posterior-only fixation; Main Outcome Measurements: Physical therapy (PT) clearance, discharge location, hospital length of stay (LOS), inpatient morphine equivalent doses (MED), and fracture displacement at follow-up. Results: Groups were similar in demographic and injury characteristics (age, high energy mechanism, ASA score, stress displacement, and rami/sacral fracture classifications). Anterior–posterior fixation resulted in longer operative times (median difference (MD): 27.0 minutes, 95% confidence interval (CI): 17.0 to 40.0, P < 0.0001) and had a trend of increased estimated blood loss (MD: 10 mL, CI: 0 to 30, P = 0.07). Patients with anterior–posterior fixation required less inpatient MEDs (MD: −180.0, CI: −341.2 to −15.0, P = 0.02), were more likely to clear PT by discharge (100% vs. 70%, proportional difference (PD): 30%, CI: 2.0%–57.2%, P = 0.02), were less likely to discharge to rehabilitation facilities (0% vs. 30%, PD: 30%, CI: 2.0%–57.2%, P = 0.02), and had a trend of less days to clear PT after surgery (MD: −1, CI: −2 to 0, P = 0.09) and decreased LOS (MD: −1, CI: −4 to 1, P = 0.17). Late fracture displacement did not differ between groups. Conclusion: Anterior–posterior fixation of LC1 injuries was associated with an improved early hospital course—specifically, reduced inpatient opioid use and an increased number of patients who could clear PT and discharge home. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Title: Combined Anterior–Posterior versus Posterior-Only Fixation of Stress-Positive Minimally Displaced Lateral Compression Type 1 (LC1) Pelvic Ring Injuries
Description:
Objectives: To compare hospital outcomes and late displacement between stress-positive minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries treated with combined anterior–posterior versus posterior-only fixation.
Design: Retrospective comparative cohort.
Setting: Urban level-one trauma center.
Patients/Participants: LC1 injuries managed operatively.
Intervention: Anterior–posterior versus posterior-only fixation; Main Outcome Measurements: Physical therapy (PT) clearance, discharge location, hospital length of stay (LOS), inpatient morphine equivalent doses (MED), and fracture displacement at follow-up.
Results: Groups were similar in demographic and injury characteristics (age, high energy mechanism, ASA score, stress displacement, and rami/sacral fracture classifications).
Anterior–posterior fixation resulted in longer operative times (median difference (MD): 27.
0 minutes, 95% confidence interval (CI): 17.
0 to 40.
0, P < 0.
0001) and had a trend of increased estimated blood loss (MD: 10 mL, CI: 0 to 30, P = 0.
07).
Patients with anterior–posterior fixation required less inpatient MEDs (MD: −180.
0, CI: −341.
2 to −15.
0, P = 0.
02), were more likely to clear PT by discharge (100% vs.
70%, proportional difference (PD): 30%, CI: 2.
0%–57.
2%, P = 0.
02), were less likely to discharge to rehabilitation facilities (0% vs.
30%, PD: 30%, CI: 2.
0%–57.
2%, P = 0.
02), and had a trend of less days to clear PT after surgery (MD: −1, CI: −2 to 0, P = 0.
09) and decreased LOS (MD: −1, CI: −4 to 1, P = 0.
17).
Late fracture displacement did not differ between groups.
Conclusion: Anterior–posterior fixation of LC1 injuries was associated with an improved early hospital course—specifically, reduced inpatient opioid use and an increased number of patients who could clear PT and discharge home.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III.
See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Related Results

Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...
Functional Outcome of Percutaneous Ilio-sacral Screw Fixation for Posterior Pelvic Ring Injuries
Functional Outcome of Percutaneous Ilio-sacral Screw Fixation for Posterior Pelvic Ring Injuries
BACKGROUND This study aimed to assess the functional outcomes of percutaneous ilio-sacral screw fixation in the treatment of posterior pelvic ring injuries. METHODS A total of 34 (...
A New Technique for Anterior Pelvic Ring Fixation Using a Minimally Invasive Approach
A New Technique for Anterior Pelvic Ring Fixation Using a Minimally Invasive Approach
Introduction: Percutaneous screw fixation have been introduced as a minimally invasive method in anterior pelvic ring fractures. The aim of the study is to present the ...
Hydatid Cyst of The Orbit: A Systematic Review with Meta-Data
Hydatid Cyst of The Orbit: A Systematic Review with Meta-Data
Abstarct Introduction Orbital hydatid cysts (HCs) constitute less than 1% of all cases of hydatidosis, yet their occurrence is often linked to severe visual complications. This stu...
Lisfranc open reduction and internal fixation in an athletic population: screw versus suture button fixation
Lisfranc open reduction and internal fixation in an athletic population: screw versus suture button fixation
Background: Primarily ligamentous Lisfranc injuries occur in athletic populations. Unstable Lisfranc injuries are treated with internal fixation or arthrodesis. Interna...
Anterior Hollow Screw Fixation Combined with Posterior Lateral Mass Screws Fixation to Treat A Huge Tear Drop Fracture of The Axis
Anterior Hollow Screw Fixation Combined with Posterior Lateral Mass Screws Fixation to Treat A Huge Tear Drop Fracture of The Axis
Teardrop fracture of axis is rarely seen, especially the huge type. The surgical approach is controversial and individualized in the literature. We reported a special case to share...

Back to Top