Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Machine Learning to Identify Flexibility Signatures of Class A GPCR Inhibition
View through CrossRef
AbstractWe show that machine learning can pinpoint features distinguishing inactive from active states in proteins, in particular identifying key ligand binding site flexibility transitions in GPCRs that are triggered by biologically active ligands. Our analysis was performed on the helical segments and loops in 18 inactive and 9 active class A GPCRs. These 3-dimensional structures were determined in complex with ligands. However, considering the flexible versus rigid state identified by graph-theoretic ProFlex rigidity analysis for each helix and loop segment with the ligand removed, followed by feature selection and k-nearest neighbor classification, was sufficient to identify four segments surrounding the ligand binding site whose flexibility/rigidity accurately predicts whether a GPCR is in an active or inactive state. GPCRs bound to inhibitors were similar in their pattern of flexible versus rigid regions, whereas agonist-bound GPCRs were more flexible and diverse. This new ligand-proximal flexibility signature of GPCR activity was identified without knowledge of the ligand binding mode or previously defined switch regions, while being adjacent to the known transmission switch. Following this proof of concept, the ProFlex flexibility analysis coupled with pattern recognition and activity classification may be useful for predicting whether newly designed ligands behave as activators or inhibitors, based on the pattern of flexibility they induce in the protein.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Title: Machine Learning to Identify Flexibility Signatures of Class A GPCR Inhibition
Description:
AbstractWe show that machine learning can pinpoint features distinguishing inactive from active states in proteins, in particular identifying key ligand binding site flexibility transitions in GPCRs that are triggered by biologically active ligands.
Our analysis was performed on the helical segments and loops in 18 inactive and 9 active class A GPCRs.
These 3-dimensional structures were determined in complex with ligands.
However, considering the flexible versus rigid state identified by graph-theoretic ProFlex rigidity analysis for each helix and loop segment with the ligand removed, followed by feature selection and k-nearest neighbor classification, was sufficient to identify four segments surrounding the ligand binding site whose flexibility/rigidity accurately predicts whether a GPCR is in an active or inactive state.
GPCRs bound to inhibitors were similar in their pattern of flexible versus rigid regions, whereas agonist-bound GPCRs were more flexible and diverse.
This new ligand-proximal flexibility signature of GPCR activity was identified without knowledge of the ligand binding mode or previously defined switch regions, while being adjacent to the known transmission switch.
Following this proof of concept, the ProFlex flexibility analysis coupled with pattern recognition and activity classification may be useful for predicting whether newly designed ligands behave as activators or inhibitors, based on the pattern of flexibility they induce in the protein.
Related Results
Relationship Domain of Form Six Teachers Thinking in Teaching with External Factors of Form Six Teachers
Relationship Domain of Form Six Teachers Thinking in Teaching with External Factors of Form Six Teachers
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:OfficeDocumentSettings> <o:RelyOnVML /> <o:AllowPNG /> </o:OfficeDocumentSettings> </xml><![endif]--> &l...
SPECIFICATION FOR TESTING AUTOMOTIVE MINIATURE BULBS
SPECIFICATION FOR TESTING AUTOMOTIVE MINIATURE BULBS
<div class="section abstract">
<div class="htmlview paragraph">The procedures contained in this specification cover the laboratory testing of miniature incandescent b...
Abstract 4712: GPCR panel establishment and application in drug discovery
Abstract 4712: GPCR panel establishment and application in drug discovery
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRS) are the largest family of membrane proteins of cell surface receptors. It can be activated by various stimuli and play a...
Manual and Machine Learning Approaches for Classifying Real and Forged Signatures—A Comparative Study and Forensic Implications
Manual and Machine Learning Approaches for Classifying Real and Forged Signatures—A Comparative Study and Forensic Implications
ABSTRACTA handwritten signature is one of the forms of a biometric measure that creates an individual identity of the persons to mark their approval related to any document. The ma...
Fuze Well Mechanical Interface
Fuze Well Mechanical Interface
<div class="section abstract">
<div class="htmlview paragraph">This interface standard applies to fuzes used in airborne weapons that use a 3-Inch Fuze Well. It defin...
G-protein-coupled receptors mediate 14-3-3 signal transduction
G-protein-coupled receptors mediate 14-3-3 signal transduction
AbstractG-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-interacting proteins likely participate in regulating GPCR signaling by eliciting specific signal transduction cascades, inducing cross-ta...
Selection of Injectable Drug Product Composition using Machine Learning Models (Preprint)
Selection of Injectable Drug Product Composition using Machine Learning Models (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
As of July 2020, a Web of Science search of “machine learning (ML)” nested within the search of “pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics” yielded over 100...
CREATING LEARNING MEDIA IN TEACHING ENGLISH AT SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 2 PAGELARAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2020/2021
CREATING LEARNING MEDIA IN TEACHING ENGLISH AT SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 2 PAGELARAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2020/2021
The pandemic Covid-19 currently demands teachers to be able to use technology in teaching and learning process. But in reality there are still many teachers who have not been able ...

