Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Exploring Ethical Issues and Dilemmas Surrounding Qualitative Research

View through CrossRef
The aim of this article is to clarify ethical criteria in qualitative research by highlighting ethical issues and dilemmas that may accompany qualitative research. This article sets the following research question for this purpose: “What ethical issues and dilemmas do researchers in the humanities and social sciences encounter in the process of conducting qualitative research?” The results of this paper are summarized as follows. Firstly, qualitative researchers faced issues such as responsibility and protection for research participants, consent and compensation for research participation, and the formation of dynamic power relationships with research participants in terms of relational ethics. Secondly, humanities and social scientists conducting qualitative research faced dilemmas based on ethical values such as respect for persons, beneficence, and justice in terms of normative ethics (deontological approach). Thirdly, qualitative researchers experienced ethical dilemmas based on methodological issues such as self-reflection, reflexivity, positionality, and situationality in terms of practical ethics. Fourthly, qualitative researchers or authors experienced dilemmas due to ethical issues such as conceptualism and methodism, research misconduct, and social responsibility in terms of academic ethics. This study will explore the ethical issues and dilemmas accompanying qualitative research, thereby strengthening the ethics and integrity of qualitative research and providing ethical criteria that can change or improve existing IRB review standards based on the perspectives of biomedicine or behavioral science. In addition, this study will provide guidelines for researchers in the humanities and social sciences to deeply understand the ethical issues and dilemmas of qualitative research and flexibly deal with research ethics.
Korean Association for Qualitative Inquiry
Title: Exploring Ethical Issues and Dilemmas Surrounding Qualitative Research
Description:
The aim of this article is to clarify ethical criteria in qualitative research by highlighting ethical issues and dilemmas that may accompany qualitative research.
This article sets the following research question for this purpose: “What ethical issues and dilemmas do researchers in the humanities and social sciences encounter in the process of conducting qualitative research?” The results of this paper are summarized as follows.
Firstly, qualitative researchers faced issues such as responsibility and protection for research participants, consent and compensation for research participation, and the formation of dynamic power relationships with research participants in terms of relational ethics.
Secondly, humanities and social scientists conducting qualitative research faced dilemmas based on ethical values such as respect for persons, beneficence, and justice in terms of normative ethics (deontological approach).
Thirdly, qualitative researchers experienced ethical dilemmas based on methodological issues such as self-reflection, reflexivity, positionality, and situationality in terms of practical ethics.
Fourthly, qualitative researchers or authors experienced dilemmas due to ethical issues such as conceptualism and methodism, research misconduct, and social responsibility in terms of academic ethics.
This study will explore the ethical issues and dilemmas accompanying qualitative research, thereby strengthening the ethics and integrity of qualitative research and providing ethical criteria that can change or improve existing IRB review standards based on the perspectives of biomedicine or behavioral science.
In addition, this study will provide guidelines for researchers in the humanities and social sciences to deeply understand the ethical issues and dilemmas of qualitative research and flexibly deal with research ethics.

Related Results

Materialism and Environmental Knowledge as a Mediator for Relationships between Religiosity and Ethical Consumption
Materialism and Environmental Knowledge as a Mediator for Relationships between Religiosity and Ethical Consumption
ABSTRACTOn a global and regional scale, Indonesia has one of the least environmentally sustainable economies in the Asia-Pacific region. Consumption is one of the key factors contr...
Ethical dilemmas in nursing documentation
Ethical dilemmas in nursing documentation
Background: Nursing documentation is an essential aspect of ethical nursing care. Lack of awareness of ethical dilemmas in nursing documentation may increase th...
Predictors of Ethical Dilemmas Among Undergraduate Pharmacy Students in Saudi Arabia: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study
Predictors of Ethical Dilemmas Among Undergraduate Pharmacy Students in Saudi Arabia: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract This multicenter cross-sectional study aimed to explore the factors influencing ethical dilemmas among undergraduate pharmacy students in Saudi Arabia, focusing on...
Prevalence of ethical dilemmas in Slovenian family practice
Prevalence of ethical dilemmas in Slovenian family practice
Purpose: To determine the perceived prevalence of ethical dilemmas in family practice. Methods: Self-administered questionnaire sent to a random sample of 259 Slovenian family phys...
Perceptions of ethical dilemmas in Australian paramedicine
Perceptions of ethical dilemmas in Australian paramedicine
Background: Paramedics experience a range of ethical dilemmas in the course of their work. To date, ethical dilemmas by Australian paramedics have not been documented. With the sco...
Head nurses’ decision-making when managing ethical dilemmas
Head nurses’ decision-making when managing ethical dilemmas
Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to characterize issues related to head nurses’ decision making when managing ethical dilemmas.Design/methodology/approach– The study is qualit...

Back to Top