Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Does access to cancer drugs relate to survival benefit? A European study in countries with different economic status.

View through CrossRef
6535 Background: As new cancer drugs come at a high cost, it is of interest to examine if drugs with high impact on survival has a relative higher uptake compared to drugs with limited impact on survival in countries with limited resources (low Gross National Product; GDP/capita) versus countries with better resources (medium or high GDP/capita). Methods: Based on published clinical trial data, including ESMO- and ASCO value scales, we selected three drugs with high impact on survival and their main indications; imatinib/Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML), rituximab (some use outside oncology)/lymphoma and trastuzumab/breast cancer compared to everolimus/ renal cancer, sorafenib/renal cancer and bevacizumab/colorectal cancer as drugs with limited impact on survival. Countries in Europe were divided into three economic groups: upper-tier GDP/ capita 36,000 – 73,400 €; (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Ireland, The Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland); mid-tier GDP 22,800 – 35,400 €; (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK) low-tier GDP 5,800 – 18,100 € (Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia). Sales data from IMS Health and epidemiological data from IARC Cancer Mondial, (WHO) were used. Access to drugs was measured as use in g/case (defined as cancer mortality in 2012) and includes total usage from introduction until end of 2014. Access in the upper-tier country group was set as 100% usage. Results: As seen in the table, access in mid-tier countries was 64-76% and low-tier countries 34-55% respectively for drugs with higher survival impact and access in mid-tier countries was 73-105% and low-tier countries 34-59% respectively, for drugs with lower survival impact. More detailed data on access in individual countries within each GDP/capita group will also be presented. Conclusions: Proven survival benefit did not affect spending on costly cancer drugs in countries with lower GDP. [Table: see text]
Title: Does access to cancer drugs relate to survival benefit? A European study in countries with different economic status.
Description:
6535 Background: As new cancer drugs come at a high cost, it is of interest to examine if drugs with high impact on survival has a relative higher uptake compared to drugs with limited impact on survival in countries with limited resources (low Gross National Product; GDP/capita) versus countries with better resources (medium or high GDP/capita).
Methods: Based on published clinical trial data, including ESMO- and ASCO value scales, we selected three drugs with high impact on survival and their main indications; imatinib/Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML), rituximab (some use outside oncology)/lymphoma and trastuzumab/breast cancer compared to everolimus/ renal cancer, sorafenib/renal cancer and bevacizumab/colorectal cancer as drugs with limited impact on survival.
Countries in Europe were divided into three economic groups: upper-tier GDP/ capita 36,000 – 73,400 €; (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Ireland, The Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland); mid-tier GDP 22,800 – 35,400 €; (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK) low-tier GDP 5,800 – 18,100 € (Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia).
Sales data from IMS Health and epidemiological data from IARC Cancer Mondial, (WHO) were used.
Access to drugs was measured as use in g/case (defined as cancer mortality in 2012) and includes total usage from introduction until end of 2014.
Access in the upper-tier country group was set as 100% usage.
Results: As seen in the table, access in mid-tier countries was 64-76% and low-tier countries 34-55% respectively for drugs with higher survival impact and access in mid-tier countries was 73-105% and low-tier countries 34-59% respectively, for drugs with lower survival impact.
More detailed data on access in individual countries within each GDP/capita group will also be presented.
Conclusions: Proven survival benefit did not affect spending on costly cancer drugs in countries with lower GDP.
[Table: see text].

Related Results

Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
Health policies and programs facilitating access to high-cost anticancer drugs
Health policies and programs facilitating access to high-cost anticancer drugs
Access to anticancer drugs is limited mainly due to their high cost. To support policymakers in Thailand to develop policies and programs to facilitate better access to high-cost a...
Ekonomika bosanskih velikaša u 14. i 15. stoljeću
Ekonomika bosanskih velikaša u 14. i 15. stoljeću
The role and significance of the Bosnian nobility in the historical currents of medieval Bosnia can be reliably traced in the 14th and 15th centuries when various socio-political f...
Diagnostic Rate of the Cancer by BDORT Utilizing the Cancer Slide
Diagnostic Rate of the Cancer by BDORT Utilizing the Cancer Slide
Purpose: To make a diagnosis of cancer with BDORT (resonance test), we can choose two methods. One is to use a chemical agent like Integrin α5β1 or Oncogene C-f...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Predictors of False-Negative Axillary FNA Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Predictors of False-Negative Axillary FNA Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract Introduction Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is commonly used to investigate lymphadenopathy of suspected metastatic origin. The current study aims to find the association be...
Abstract IA31: Molecular epidemiology of ovarian cancer
Abstract IA31: Molecular epidemiology of ovarian cancer
Abstract Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) accounts for 5% of all cancer deaths and is the fifth leading cause of cancer death in women in the United States. While the...

Back to Top