Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Assessing the Clinical, Economic, and Health Resource Utilization Impacts of Prefilled Syringes Versus Conventional Medication Administration Methods: Results From a Systematic Literature Review
View through CrossRef
Objective:
The objective of this systematic review was to assess the clinical, economic, and health resource utilization outcomes associated with the use of prefilled syringes in medication administration compared with traditional preparation methods.
Data Sources:
We conducted a systematic literature review to evaluate outcomes such as medication errors, wastage, time savings, and contamination in prefilled syringes. Our search encompassed multiple databases, including PubMed and Embase, for studies published between January 1, 2017, and November 1, 2022.
Study selection and data extraction:
Peer-reviewed publications meeting our inclusion criteria underwent rigorous screening, including title, abstract, and full-text article assessments, performed by two reviewers.
Data synthesis:
Among reviewed articles, 24 met our eligibility criteria. Selected studies were primarily observational (46%) and conducted in Europe (46%). Our findings indicated that prefilled syringes consistently reduced medication errors (by 10%-73%), adverse events (from 1.1 to 0.275 per 100 administrations), wastage (by up to 80% of drug), and preparation time (from 4.0 to 338.0 seconds) (ranges varied by drug type, setting, and dosage). However, there was limited data on contamination. Economically, prefilled syringes reduced waste and error rates, which may translate into overall savings.
Relevance to patient care and clinical practice:
This review highlights the value of prefilled syringes, which can streamline medication delivery, save nursing time, and reduce preventable medication errors. Moreover, prefilled syringes have the potential to minimize medication wastage, optimizing resource utilization and efficiency in health care settings.
Conclusion and relevance:
Our findings provide new insights into clinical and economic benefits of prefilled syringe adoption. These benefits include improved medication delivery and safety, which can lead to time and cost reductions for health care departments, hospitals, and health systems. However, further real-world research on clinical and economic outcomes, especially in contamination, is needed to better understand the benefits of prefilled syringes.
Title: Assessing the Clinical, Economic, and Health Resource Utilization Impacts of Prefilled Syringes Versus Conventional Medication Administration Methods: Results From a Systematic Literature Review
Description:
Objective:
The objective of this systematic review was to assess the clinical, economic, and health resource utilization outcomes associated with the use of prefilled syringes in medication administration compared with traditional preparation methods.
Data Sources:
We conducted a systematic literature review to evaluate outcomes such as medication errors, wastage, time savings, and contamination in prefilled syringes.
Our search encompassed multiple databases, including PubMed and Embase, for studies published between January 1, 2017, and November 1, 2022.
Study selection and data extraction:
Peer-reviewed publications meeting our inclusion criteria underwent rigorous screening, including title, abstract, and full-text article assessments, performed by two reviewers.
Data synthesis:
Among reviewed articles, 24 met our eligibility criteria.
Selected studies were primarily observational (46%) and conducted in Europe (46%).
Our findings indicated that prefilled syringes consistently reduced medication errors (by 10%-73%), adverse events (from 1.
1 to 0.
275 per 100 administrations), wastage (by up to 80% of drug), and preparation time (from 4.
0 to 338.
0 seconds) (ranges varied by drug type, setting, and dosage).
However, there was limited data on contamination.
Economically, prefilled syringes reduced waste and error rates, which may translate into overall savings.
Relevance to patient care and clinical practice:
This review highlights the value of prefilled syringes, which can streamline medication delivery, save nursing time, and reduce preventable medication errors.
Moreover, prefilled syringes have the potential to minimize medication wastage, optimizing resource utilization and efficiency in health care settings.
Conclusion and relevance:
Our findings provide new insights into clinical and economic benefits of prefilled syringe adoption.
These benefits include improved medication delivery and safety, which can lead to time and cost reductions for health care departments, hospitals, and health systems.
However, further real-world research on clinical and economic outcomes, especially in contamination, is needed to better understand the benefits of prefilled syringes.
Related Results
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
NICU Medication Errors: Describing the Cause and Nature of Medication Errors in a NICU in Qatar
NICU Medication Errors: Describing the Cause and Nature of Medication Errors in a NICU in Qatar
IntroductionA medication error can be defined as “any error occurring in the medication use process” and focuses on problems with the delivery of medication to a patient [1]. Medic...
Prefilled Syringes: A Comprehensive Review of Design, Manufacturing, Clinical Benefits, and Future Trends
Prefilled Syringes: A Comprehensive Review of Design, Manufacturing, Clinical Benefits, and Future Trends
Prefilled syringes (PFSs) are increasingly used as primary packaging systems for parenteral drug delivery due to their ability to enhance medication safety, dosing accuracy, and op...
Housing Improvements for Health and Associated Socio‐Economic Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Housing Improvements for Health and Associated Socio‐Economic Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Poor housing is associated with poor health. This suggests that improving housing conditions might lead to improved health for residents. This review searched widely for studies fr...
Exploring Medication Error Causality and Reporting: A Cross Sectional Survey of Hamad Medical Corporation Health Professionals
Exploring Medication Error Causality and Reporting: A Cross Sectional Survey of Hamad Medical Corporation Health Professionals
IntroductionMedication errors are a major global issue, adversely impacting patient safety and health outcomes. Promoting patient safety through minimizing medication errors is the...
Abstract 2233: Biobehavioral Factors and Heart Failure Medication Adherence
Abstract 2233: Biobehavioral Factors and Heart Failure Medication Adherence
Background:
Medication adherence in heart failure (HF) patients reduces hospitalizations and improves outcomes, yet it is variable. This study evaluated adherence rates...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
<b>INCIDENCE AND PREDICTORS OF MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION ERRORS AMONG NURSES AT MEDICARE HOSPITAL MULTAN.</b>
<b>INCIDENCE AND PREDICTORS OF MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION ERRORS AMONG NURSES AT MEDICARE HOSPITAL MULTAN.</b>
Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of medication administration errors (MAEs) among nurses and to identify nurse-related and system-related pred...

