Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Policies to Overcome Judicial Mafia Practices within the Supreme Court
View through CrossRef
The practice of law enforcement in Indonesia until now is still surrounded by various problems that keep the law away from its main purpose to provide justice, certainty, and benefits to the community. this is due to the existence of judicial mafia practices that are difficult to eradicate. The study are focus What is the policy in the Supreme Court in eradicating judicial mafia practices within the court Why is there an obstacle in the role of the supreme court supervisory body in realizing the eradication of judicial mafia practices within the court? What is the ideal policy of the Supreme Court supervisory body in eradicating the judicial mafia This study uses a Normative and Empirical Juridical approach. Normative research is carried out on matters that are theoretical principles of law, whereas an empirical approach is carried out to study law in reality in the field. The results of the study found that one of the manifestations of criminal policy efforts in overcoming the practice of judicial mafia in the court environment by building the characteristics of the human resources of the judicial executing instrument that includes Judges and Clerks to become apparatus free from corruption through proven participation in socialization. , Technical guidance and also comparative studies to countries that have the determination to eradicate corruption, conduct Coordination and Supervision Consultation at the Regional Level and Formation of Liaison and Assistance Team, There is an obstacle in the role of the Supreme Court supervisory body in realizing eradication of judicial mafia practices in the court environment due to by the Weak Sectoral Law Enforcement Supervisory Body in each of the Judicial Agencies, Government policies in eradicating judicial corruption are often counterproductive and the ideal Policy of the Court Supervisory Agency great in eradicating the judicial mafia is carried out by means of penal and non-penal namely namely by using criminal law facilities to punish the perpetrators involved in the practice of judicial mafia starting from the judge who hears the case to the court clerk. As for the suggestions that can be conveyed in this study, it is better for the Supreme Court to immediately improve its supervision of the actions of the judicial mafia in the court, especially in conducting law enforcement that is not selective; and It is better that judges are not easily persuaded by bribes to handle a case and also maintain the dignity of the judge in hearing the case being handled.
Title: Policies to Overcome Judicial Mafia Practices within the Supreme Court
Description:
The practice of law enforcement in Indonesia until now is still surrounded by various problems that keep the law away from its main purpose to provide justice, certainty, and benefits to the community.
this is due to the existence of judicial mafia practices that are difficult to eradicate.
The study are focus What is the policy in the Supreme Court in eradicating judicial mafia practices within the court Why is there an obstacle in the role of the supreme court supervisory body in realizing the eradication of judicial mafia practices within the court? What is the ideal policy of the Supreme Court supervisory body in eradicating the judicial mafia This study uses a Normative and Empirical Juridical approach.
Normative research is carried out on matters that are theoretical principles of law, whereas an empirical approach is carried out to study law in reality in the field.
The results of the study found that one of the manifestations of criminal policy efforts in overcoming the practice of judicial mafia in the court environment by building the characteristics of the human resources of the judicial executing instrument that includes Judges and Clerks to become apparatus free from corruption through proven participation in socialization.
, Technical guidance and also comparative studies to countries that have the determination to eradicate corruption, conduct Coordination and Supervision Consultation at the Regional Level and Formation of Liaison and Assistance Team, There is an obstacle in the role of the Supreme Court supervisory body in realizing eradication of judicial mafia practices in the court environment due to by the Weak Sectoral Law Enforcement Supervisory Body in each of the Judicial Agencies, Government policies in eradicating judicial corruption are often counterproductive and the ideal Policy of the Court Supervisory Agency great in eradicating the judicial mafia is carried out by means of penal and non-penal namely namely by using criminal law facilities to punish the perpetrators involved in the practice of judicial mafia starting from the judge who hears the case to the court clerk.
As for the suggestions that can be conveyed in this study, it is better for the Supreme Court to immediately improve its supervision of the actions of the judicial mafia in the court, especially in conducting law enforcement that is not selective; and It is better that judges are not easily persuaded by bribes to handle a case and also maintain the dignity of the judge in hearing the case being handled.
Related Results
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com
Abstract
Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
This study examines the evolving role of the judiciary in Pakistan in interpreting the Constitution, exploring how the courts have come to terms with their position as the primary ...
Judicial Review Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint dalam Perspektif Kebebasan Kehakiman
Judicial Review Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint dalam Perspektif Kebebasan Kehakiman
The discourse between the application of judicial activism or judicial restraint has become a hot issue of judicial review authority where recently the Constitutional Court through...
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
The Constitutional Court received a total of 2,829 cases in 2022 alone. Among the decisions made by the Constitutional Court in 2022, this paper reviews major decisions centered on...
National Judicial Commission In India: The New Challenge
National Judicial Commission In India: The New Challenge
Art. 50 of our constitution provide - separation of powers and independent judiciary (under directive principles) and Art. 13 of the Indian constitution provide vital power to amen...
PRAKTIK MAFIA TANAH DALAM TINJAUAN SOSIOLOGI HUKUM
PRAKTIK MAFIA TANAH DALAM TINJAUAN SOSIOLOGI HUKUM
Latar Belakang:
Tanah merupakan sebuah aset berharga bagi mereka yang memilikinya. Hak kepemilikan atas tanah ditunjukkan dalam wujud sertifikat tanah. Seiring dengan pembangunan ...
Analysis of the Supreme Court Cases in 2022: The Law of Claims
Analysis of the Supreme Court Cases in 2022: The Law of Claims
In this paper, among the major precedents of the Supreme Court on civil matters in the year 2022, I analyzed the meaning and contents of 8 important decisions (focused on the claim...

