Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Deflationist Truth

View through CrossRef
A taxonomy of theories of truth is provided. Two versions of deflationist theories of “true” are distinguished, T-schema deflationism and semantic-descent deflationism. These are distinguished from a deflationist theory of truth-ascription, and distinguished in turn from a deflationist theory of truths—a view that the various truths share no significant property. Opposed to these deflationist positions are various substantivalist truth theories. It is suggested that the semantic-descent deflationist theory of “true” and the deflationist theory of truths are correct, although the considerations that support or attack these different deflationist theories are largely independent of one another. A deflationist theory of truth-ascription is denied, however. Sometimes statements do attribute a truth-property to a set of statements. The chapter ends with an evaluation of the cases where supplementing a formal language with a truth predicate is not conservative. It is argued that these cases do not bear on debates about truth deflationism.
Oxford University Press
Title: Deflationist Truth
Description:
A taxonomy of theories of truth is provided.
Two versions of deflationist theories of “true” are distinguished, T-schema deflationism and semantic-descent deflationism.
These are distinguished from a deflationist theory of truth-ascription, and distinguished in turn from a deflationist theory of truths—a view that the various truths share no significant property.
Opposed to these deflationist positions are various substantivalist truth theories.
It is suggested that the semantic-descent deflationist theory of “true” and the deflationist theory of truths are correct, although the considerations that support or attack these different deflationist theories are largely independent of one another.
A deflationist theory of truth-ascription is denied, however.
Sometimes statements do attribute a truth-property to a set of statements.
The chapter ends with an evaluation of the cases where supplementing a formal language with a truth predicate is not conservative.
It is argued that these cases do not bear on debates about truth deflationism.

Related Results

Truth-Making and the Nature of Truth
Truth-Making and the Nature of Truth
Chapter 9 claimed that a way to preserve ideas about truth-making is to think of truth differently for different sorts of claims. However, what, exactly is the connection between t...
Deflationism and Paradox
Deflationism and Paradox
Abstract Deflationist accounts of truth are widely held in contemporary philosophy: they seek to show that truth is a dispensable concept with no metaphysical depth....
Theater in a Post-Truth World
Theater in a Post-Truth World
This is the first book to examine how the concept and disagreements around “post-truth” have been explored in the world of theater and performance. This ranges from the plays of Ca...
Practical Truth
Practical Truth
Abstract Aristotle argues that the actions central to human flourishing are those that involve reason. But reason manifests itself in a human life in more than one w...
Relative Truth
Relative Truth
The word “relativism” has been applied to many different positions in philosophy. This chapter focuses on a contemporary version of relativism. According to this version of relativ...
Attunement and Perspectival Truth
Attunement and Perspectival Truth
Once we have rejected the notion of a subject-independent objectivity, we lack any basis for assuming that our emotional responses project value onto a neutral world. Love’s vision...
Buddhist Reductionist Action Theory
Buddhist Reductionist Action Theory
This essay develops the theory of action presupposed by Buddhist Reductionists. Their account uses the theory of two truths to reconcile the folk theory of human action with the Bu...
Does Belief Have an Aim?
Does Belief Have an Aim?
The hypothesis that belief aims at the truth has been used to explain three features of belief: (1) the fact that correct beliefs are true beliefs; (2) the fact that rational belie...

Back to Top