Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

EVALUATION OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM. L) GENOTYPES FOR DROUGHT RESISTANCE THROUGH AGRONOMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERS

View through CrossRef
Drought stress represents a critical constraint to global wheat production, causing significant yield losses and threatening food security in arid and semi-arid regions. This study evaluates 50 diverse wheat genotypes for drought resistance through comprehensive analysis of 15 agronomic traits and 12 physiological parameters under controlled and field drought conditions across three growing seasons (2020-2023). Employing a split-plot design with three replications, genotypes were subjected to three water regimes: well-watered (80% field capacity), moderate drought (50% field capacity), and severe drought (30% field capacity). Results demonstrate that drought stress reduced grain yield by 35-72% across genotypes, with drought susceptibility index (DSI) values ranging from 0.38 to 1.65. Physiological characterization revealed that drought-resistant genotypes maintained 40-60% higher relative water content (RWC), exhibited 25-45% lower canopy temperature depression (CTD), and demonstrated 30-55% higher chlorophyll stability index (CSI) compared to susceptible genotypes under severe drought. Root architecture analysis showed that drought-tolerant genotypes developed 35-70% deeper root systems with 40-85% higher root dry weight, while maintaining 20-40% lower root-to-shoot ratio under stress conditions. Stomatal conductance decreased by 45-80% across genotypes under drought, but resistant lines maintained 25-50% higher photosynthetic rates through better water use efficiency (WUE) of 2.8-4.2 g/kg H₂O versus 1.2-2.4 g/kg H₂O for susceptible lines. Proline accumulation increased 3-8 fold under drought stress, with highest concentrations (18-25 μmol/g FW) observed in resistant genotypes. Multivariate analysis identified three principal components explaining 78.4% of total variation, with root traits, WUE, and RWC contributing most to drought resistance. Genotypic clustering revealed four distinct groups: highly resistant (8 genotypes), moderately resistant (15), moderately susceptible (18), and highly susceptible (9 genotypes). Genome-wide association study (GWAS) identified 12 significant marker-trait associations for drought resistance traits, explaining 8-22% of phenotypic variation. This study concludes that integrative evaluation combining agronomic performance with physiological mechanisms provides effective identification of drought-resistant wheat genotypes, with root architecture, water use efficiency, and osmotic adjustment emerging as key selection criteria for breeding programs targeting drought-prone environments.
Title: EVALUATION OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM. L) GENOTYPES FOR DROUGHT RESISTANCE THROUGH AGRONOMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERS
Description:
Drought stress represents a critical constraint to global wheat production, causing significant yield losses and threatening food security in arid and semi-arid regions.
This study evaluates 50 diverse wheat genotypes for drought resistance through comprehensive analysis of 15 agronomic traits and 12 physiological parameters under controlled and field drought conditions across three growing seasons (2020-2023).
Employing a split-plot design with three replications, genotypes were subjected to three water regimes: well-watered (80% field capacity), moderate drought (50% field capacity), and severe drought (30% field capacity).
Results demonstrate that drought stress reduced grain yield by 35-72% across genotypes, with drought susceptibility index (DSI) values ranging from 0.
38 to 1.
65.
Physiological characterization revealed that drought-resistant genotypes maintained 40-60% higher relative water content (RWC), exhibited 25-45% lower canopy temperature depression (CTD), and demonstrated 30-55% higher chlorophyll stability index (CSI) compared to susceptible genotypes under severe drought.
Root architecture analysis showed that drought-tolerant genotypes developed 35-70% deeper root systems with 40-85% higher root dry weight, while maintaining 20-40% lower root-to-shoot ratio under stress conditions.
Stomatal conductance decreased by 45-80% across genotypes under drought, but resistant lines maintained 25-50% higher photosynthetic rates through better water use efficiency (WUE) of 2.
8-4.
2 g/kg H₂O versus 1.
2-2.
4 g/kg H₂O for susceptible lines.
Proline accumulation increased 3-8 fold under drought stress, with highest concentrations (18-25 μmol/g FW) observed in resistant genotypes.
Multivariate analysis identified three principal components explaining 78.
4% of total variation, with root traits, WUE, and RWC contributing most to drought resistance.
Genotypic clustering revealed four distinct groups: highly resistant (8 genotypes), moderately resistant (15), moderately susceptible (18), and highly susceptible (9 genotypes).
Genome-wide association study (GWAS) identified 12 significant marker-trait associations for drought resistance traits, explaining 8-22% of phenotypic variation.
This study concludes that integrative evaluation combining agronomic performance with physiological mechanisms provides effective identification of drought-resistant wheat genotypes, with root architecture, water use efficiency, and osmotic adjustment emerging as key selection criteria for breeding programs targeting drought-prone environments.

Related Results

Evaluation of Alternative Break Crops in Rotation with Bread Wheat (triticum aestivum l.) in South-Eastern Ethiopia
Evaluation of Alternative Break Crops in Rotation with Bread Wheat (triticum aestivum l.) in South-Eastern Ethiopia
Crop rotation could be a possible intervention to resolve multifaceted problems of monoculture. In recent years, there is a concern about soil depletion caused by intensive farming...
Delineation of Physiological, Agronomic and Genetic Responses of Different Wheat Genotypes under Drought Condition
Delineation of Physiological, Agronomic and Genetic Responses of Different Wheat Genotypes under Drought Condition
Abioticstress such as drought is a potential threat posing a severe challenge to wheat production across the globe. The current study comparatively delineated the performance of el...
Morphological characterization of Mongolian local common wheat (Triticum. Aestivum) species
Morphological characterization of Mongolian local common wheat (Triticum. Aestivum) species
The common wheat is one of the most important food crops and cultivated for more than 2000 years in Mongolia that are evidenced in the books of ancient scholars and archeological f...
Row Orientation and Planting Pattern of Relay Intercropped Soybean and Wheat
Row Orientation and Planting Pattern of Relay Intercropped Soybean and Wheat
Relay intercropping soybean [Glycine max(L.) Merr.] into winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) may increase soybean yields compared with doublecropping. Once the soybean crop is esta...
Environmental Effects and Their impact on Yield in Adjacent Experimental Plots of High and Short Stem Wheat Varieties
Environmental Effects and Their impact on Yield in Adjacent Experimental Plots of High and Short Stem Wheat Varieties
Abstract Using Xinhuamai818 as the experimental material for high stem wheat varieties, HHH as the control plot for high stem wheat varieties(One letter represents ...

Back to Top