Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Standard Instruments Versus Microdebrider in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery-An Outcome Based Comparative Study: ATertiary Care Hospital Experience
View through CrossRef
Background :In endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, the standard instruments have been in use to remove diseased mucosa and polyps since decades. The powered instrument like microdebrider is a current innovation to replace the conventional instruments during ESS.
Objective : To compare the outcome after using standard instruments versus microdebrider in endoscopic sinus surgery for restoring sinus drainage.
Methods: This Randomized Controlled Trial (IRCT Id:78723) was conducted at Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur from 1st April 2022 to 31st December 2022. About 130 patients of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis from 15-65 years of age were included after informed written consent. Patients were equally divided in two groups. In Group A, patients underwent endoscopic polypectomy and clearance of the sinuses with widening of ostia using microdebrider while in group B, standard conventional instruments were used. All patients were followed for 8 weeks and outcome (duration of procedure, per-operative bleeding, post-operative pain, synechiae formation and recurrence) was noted. The data was analyzed by using the SPSS version 25.
Results: Out of 130 patients 49 were females and 81 were males. Mean duration of surgery was 53.58 ± 6.97 minutes in microdebrider group and 76.18 ± 6.80 minutes in standard instruments group. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 81.57 ± 9.28 ml in microdebrider group and 104.80 ± 10.44 ml in standard instruments group. Mean post-operative pain (by Visual Analogue Scale) was 1.25 ± 1.00 in microdebrider group and 3.83 ± 1.26 in standard instruments group. Synechiae formation and recurrence were seen in 4.62% and 3.08% respectively after ESS with microdebrider (group A) while in 13.85% and 16.92% respectively after ESS with standard instruments (group B).
Conclusion : There is significantly less post-operative pain, duration of surgery and per-operative blood loss in patients having endoscopic sinus surgery with microdebrider as compared to standard instruments.
King Edward Medical University
Title: Standard Instruments Versus Microdebrider in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery-An Outcome Based Comparative Study: ATertiary Care Hospital Experience
Description:
Background :In endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, the standard instruments have been in use to remove diseased mucosa and polyps since decades.
The powered instrument like microdebrider is a current innovation to replace the conventional instruments during ESS.
Objective : To compare the outcome after using standard instruments versus microdebrider in endoscopic sinus surgery for restoring sinus drainage.
Methods: This Randomized Controlled Trial (IRCT Id:78723) was conducted at Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur from 1st April 2022 to 31st December 2022.
About 130 patients of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis from 15-65 years of age were included after informed written consent.
Patients were equally divided in two groups.
In Group A, patients underwent endoscopic polypectomy and clearance of the sinuses with widening of ostia using microdebrider while in group B, standard conventional instruments were used.
All patients were followed for 8 weeks and outcome (duration of procedure, per-operative bleeding, post-operative pain, synechiae formation and recurrence) was noted.
The data was analyzed by using the SPSS version 25.
Results: Out of 130 patients 49 were females and 81 were males.
Mean duration of surgery was 53.
58 ± 6.
97 minutes in microdebrider group and 76.
18 ± 6.
80 minutes in standard instruments group.
Mean intraoperative blood loss was 81.
57 ± 9.
28 ml in microdebrider group and 104.
80 ± 10.
44 ml in standard instruments group.
Mean post-operative pain (by Visual Analogue Scale) was 1.
25 ± 1.
00 in microdebrider group and 3.
83 ± 1.
26 in standard instruments group.
Synechiae formation and recurrence were seen in 4.
62% and 3.
08% respectively after ESS with microdebrider (group A) while in 13.
85% and 16.
92% respectively after ESS with standard instruments (group B).
Conclusion : There is significantly less post-operative pain, duration of surgery and per-operative blood loss in patients having endoscopic sinus surgery with microdebrider as compared to standard instruments.
Related Results
A comparison of use microdebrider with conventional endoscopic surgery for nasal polyps
A comparison of use microdebrider with conventional endoscopic surgery for nasal polyps
Background: Nasal polyps are chronic and benign inflammatory lesions that arise from the mucous membrane of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. And it represents a challenge in...
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a recently identified immune-mediated condition that is debilitating and often overlooked. While IgG4-RD has be...
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Multiple Concurrent Pilonidal Sinuses: Case report and Literature review
Multiple Concurrent Pilonidal Sinuses: Case report and Literature review
Abstract
Introduction: Concurrent pilonidal sinuses (PNSs) at distinct locations are extremely rare. This report highlights an exceptional case of a young female presenting with th...
One-nostril endoscopic endonasal approach for pituitary macroadenoma resection
One-nostril endoscopic endonasal approach for pituitary macroadenoma resection
Abstract
Introduction: Endoscopic techniques have become the standard approach for pituitary adenoma surgery, providing improved visualization of the hypophyseal fossa and facili...
Atypical Presentations of Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Case Series with Literature Review
Atypical Presentations of Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Case Series with Literature Review
Abstract
Introduction: Pilonidal sinus (PNS) typically arises in the sacrococcygeal region but can occasionally present in atypical locations, including the axilla, intermammary re...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract
Introduction
Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Long‐term frontal sinus patency after endoscopic frontal sinusotomy
Long‐term frontal sinus patency after endoscopic frontal sinusotomy
AbstractBackground:The frontal recess is the drainage pathway that connects the frontal sinus to the anterior ethmoid sinus. Mechanical obstruction is the primary cause of chronic ...

