Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Arable farmers’ livelihood options as a means of climate variability adaptation strategies in Ondo State, Nigeria
View through CrossRef
The study was designed to assess arable farmers’ livelihood options as a means of climate variability adaptation strategies in Ondo State, Nigeria. Specifically, the objective described the socioeconomic characteristics of arable farmers in Ondo State; examined other livelihood options engaged by the arable farmers in combating effects of climate variability on their farm income; determined the contribution of alternative livelihood options to total income and identified factors that influence the choice of alternative livelihood options. Multi-stage sampling technique was employed in the study area to collect data through in-depth interview from one hundred and sixty (160) arable farmers in four (4) designated agricultural zones in Ondo State. Moreover, the primary data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multinomial logistic regression. Apart from the fact that the findings revealed that majority of the respondents (78.75%) were male, it was also observed that the predominant age of the respondents was between 41 and 50 years (34.38%), with an average age of 45 years. The study also revealed that 21.3% of respondents selected off-farming as their option for a livelihood, while 32.5% of respondents engaged in non-farming activities as source of income. The study also revealed that the respondents' participation in non-farming and off-farming activities contributed about 40% of the total income they took in, making this choice the one that had the greatest impact on overall income. Multinomial logistic regression result revealed that respondents who chose farming as a livelihood option shows that age and primary education significantly influence the choice of choosing farming at 5% level of significance. Marital status, secondary education and, farm experience significantly influence the choice of choosing farming at 10% level of significance, while distance from of home to market significantly influence the choice of choosing farming at 1% level of significance. Also, respondents who chose off- farming as a livelihood option shows that age and farming experience significantly influence the choice of choosing off-farming at 10% level of significance, while respondents who chose non & off- farming livelihood option shows that age significantly influence the choice of choosing non & off-farming at 5% level of significance and farming experience significantly influence the choice of choosing non and off-farming at 1% level of significance: using non-farming as a base category.
Title: Arable farmers’ livelihood options as a means of climate variability adaptation strategies in Ondo State, Nigeria
Description:
The study was designed to assess arable farmers’ livelihood options as a means of climate variability adaptation strategies in Ondo State, Nigeria.
Specifically, the objective described the socioeconomic characteristics of arable farmers in Ondo State; examined other livelihood options engaged by the arable farmers in combating effects of climate variability on their farm income; determined the contribution of alternative livelihood options to total income and identified factors that influence the choice of alternative livelihood options.
Multi-stage sampling technique was employed in the study area to collect data through in-depth interview from one hundred and sixty (160) arable farmers in four (4) designated agricultural zones in Ondo State.
Moreover, the primary data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multinomial logistic regression.
Apart from the fact that the findings revealed that majority of the respondents (78.
75%) were male, it was also observed that the predominant age of the respondents was between 41 and 50 years (34.
38%), with an average age of 45 years.
The study also revealed that 21.
3% of respondents selected off-farming as their option for a livelihood, while 32.
5% of respondents engaged in non-farming activities as source of income.
The study also revealed that the respondents' participation in non-farming and off-farming activities contributed about 40% of the total income they took in, making this choice the one that had the greatest impact on overall income.
Multinomial logistic regression result revealed that respondents who chose farming as a livelihood option shows that age and primary education significantly influence the choice of choosing farming at 5% level of significance.
Marital status, secondary education and, farm experience significantly influence the choice of choosing farming at 10% level of significance, while distance from of home to market significantly influence the choice of choosing farming at 1% level of significance.
Also, respondents who chose off- farming as a livelihood option shows that age and farming experience significantly influence the choice of choosing off-farming at 10% level of significance, while respondents who chose non & off- farming livelihood option shows that age significantly influence the choice of choosing non & off-farming at 5% level of significance and farming experience significantly influence the choice of choosing non and off-farming at 1% level of significance: using non-farming as a base category.
Related Results
“The Earth Is Dying, Bro”
“The Earth Is Dying, Bro”
Climate Change and Children
Australian children are uniquely situated in a vast landscape that varies drastically across locations. Spanning multiple climatic zones—from cool tempe...
Successful coastal adaptation projects? The role of multi-lateral climate funding.
Successful coastal adaptation projects? The role of multi-lateral climate funding.
<p><strong>This thesis investigates the evaluation of climate change adaptation success of projects in coastal zones of developing countries, specifically focusing on t...
Sustainable Livelihoods of Farming Herdsmen and Household-Level Livelihood Vulnerability Assessment and the Effect Tobacco Consumption in High-Frigid Ecological Vulnerable Region of the Northern Tibetan Plateau
Sustainable Livelihoods of Farming Herdsmen and Household-Level Livelihood Vulnerability Assessment and the Effect Tobacco Consumption in High-Frigid Ecological Vulnerable Region of the Northern Tibetan Plateau
Improving farmers’ livelihood diversity is the best way to address livelihood vulnerability and fragile ecological environments . In this study, we used participatory rural apprais...
Adaptive Planning for Resilient Coastal Waterfronts
Adaptive Planning for Resilient Coastal Waterfronts
Many delta and coastal cities worldwide face increasing flood risk due to changing climate conditions and sea level rise. The question is how to develop measures and strategies for...
Climate and Culture
Climate and Culture
Climate is, presently, a heatedly discussed topic. Concerns about the environmental, economic, political and social consequences of climate change are of central interest in academ...
Ethics of climate change : a normative account
Ethics of climate change : a normative account
Consider, for instance, you and your family have lived around a place where you enjoyed the flora and fauna of the land as well as the natural environment. Fishing and farming were...
Livelihood Vulnerability from Drought among Smallholder Livestock Farmers in South Africa
Livelihood Vulnerability from Drought among Smallholder Livestock Farmers in South Africa
The impacts of drought and climate change on agriculture have become increasingly apparent, and affect smallholder livestock farmers. Farmers’ livelihoods rely on agriculture; thus...
A Review on Carbon Source and Sink in Arable Land Ecosystems
A Review on Carbon Source and Sink in Arable Land Ecosystems
Arable land ecosystems are among the most important terrestrial systems. The issues of carbon sequestration and emission reductions in arable land ecosystems have received extensiv...

