Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Abstract 3597: Defining cancer risk germline variants in shelterin complex genes - a genome-first analysis
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background:
The shelterin complex (encoded by ACD, POT1, TERF1, TERF2, TERF2IP, andTINF2) is essential for telomere maintenance and chromosome stability. Pathogenic or likelypathogenic (P/LP) germline variants in some shelterin genes cause telomere biology disorders aswell as cancer predisposition with long telomeres. To date, studies have focused on clinicallyascertained families. Genome-first approaches identify individuals with rare P/LP variants frompopulation-scale sequencing databases linked to electronic health records, enabling better estimates of variant prevalence and cancer risk.
Methods:
We assessed rare (minor allele frequency<1%) P/LP germline variants in ACD,TERF1, TERF2, TERF2IP, and TINF2. Exome and phenotype data were analyzed from UKBiobank (UKB) (N=469,578) and Geisinger DiscovEHR cohort (N=216,361). Variants wereclassified using AutoGVP and literature review. Cancer prevalence and risk in carriers versusnoncarriers were evaluated using logistic regression models, respectively, adjusted for year ofbirth, sex, smoking status, alcohol intake, body mass index, and genetically determined ancestry.
Results:
We identified 1,200 individuals (784 in UKB and 416 in Geisinger) with P/LP germlinevariants in shelterin complex genes. The prevalence of shelterin variants ranged from 1:1,886 to1:39,132 in UKB and 1:1,157 to 1:24,040 in Geisinger, ACD and TINF2 had the highestestimates and TERF2 the lowest. In ACD, a variant previously associated with cancer(c.488A>G, p.Asn163Ser) accounted for 49.3% of all ACD carriers. In UKB, TINF2 carriers hadsignificantly increased risk for melanoma (OR 5.33 (1.93-14.70); p=0.015), endocrine cancers(OR 25.30 (9.16-69.87); p<0.001), and mesothelioma (OR 18.38 (2.47-137.02); p=0.036) anddemonstrated overall earlier ages at cancer onset than noncarriers (p=0.0036). In Geisinger,TINF2 was associated with increased risk of cancers of soft tissue including heart (OR 6.76 (1.65-27.60); p=0.01), liver/ bile duct (OR 3.28 (1.03-10.50); p=0.05), and brain/nervous system(OR 5.19 (1.89-14.20); p<0.001). In Geisinger, ACD carriers with c.488A>G had an increasedrisk of eye and orbit cancers (OR 15.27 (2.10-111.00); p=0.007), although there was only onecarrier. The number of cancer events among individuals with TERF1, TERF2, and TERF2IPvariants was insufficient for statistical analyses.
Conclusion:
In Geisinger, prevalence of rare P/LP shelterin gene variants was generally higherthan in UKB, reflecting the clinically enriched nature of that cohort. TINF2 had variants with thestrongest cancer associations. Longitudinal studies of younger cohorts are warranted to refineprevalence estimates and cancer risk associated with shelterin complex genes.
Citation Format:
Hasset Nurelegne, Akanksha Nagarkar, Jung Kim, Douglas Stewart, Sharon Savage, Kelvin C. De Andrade, . Defining cancer risk germline variants in shelterin complex genes - a genome-first analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3597.
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Title: Abstract 3597: Defining cancer risk germline variants in shelterin complex genes - a genome-first analysis
Description:
Abstract
Background:
The shelterin complex (encoded by ACD, POT1, TERF1, TERF2, TERF2IP, andTINF2) is essential for telomere maintenance and chromosome stability.
Pathogenic or likelypathogenic (P/LP) germline variants in some shelterin genes cause telomere biology disorders aswell as cancer predisposition with long telomeres.
To date, studies have focused on clinicallyascertained families.
Genome-first approaches identify individuals with rare P/LP variants frompopulation-scale sequencing databases linked to electronic health records, enabling better estimates of variant prevalence and cancer risk.
Methods:
We assessed rare (minor allele frequency<1%) P/LP germline variants in ACD,TERF1, TERF2, TERF2IP, and TINF2.
Exome and phenotype data were analyzed from UKBiobank (UKB) (N=469,578) and Geisinger DiscovEHR cohort (N=216,361).
Variants wereclassified using AutoGVP and literature review.
Cancer prevalence and risk in carriers versusnoncarriers were evaluated using logistic regression models, respectively, adjusted for year ofbirth, sex, smoking status, alcohol intake, body mass index, and genetically determined ancestry.
Results:
We identified 1,200 individuals (784 in UKB and 416 in Geisinger) with P/LP germlinevariants in shelterin complex genes.
The prevalence of shelterin variants ranged from 1:1,886 to1:39,132 in UKB and 1:1,157 to 1:24,040 in Geisinger, ACD and TINF2 had the highestestimates and TERF2 the lowest.
In ACD, a variant previously associated with cancer(c.
488A>G, p.
Asn163Ser) accounted for 49.
3% of all ACD carriers.
In UKB, TINF2 carriers hadsignificantly increased risk for melanoma (OR 5.
33 (1.
93-14.
70); p=0.
015), endocrine cancers(OR 25.
30 (9.
16-69.
87); p<0.
001), and mesothelioma (OR 18.
38 (2.
47-137.
02); p=0.
036) anddemonstrated overall earlier ages at cancer onset than noncarriers (p=0.
0036).
In Geisinger,TINF2 was associated with increased risk of cancers of soft tissue including heart (OR 6.
76 (1.
65-27.
60); p=0.
01), liver/ bile duct (OR 3.
28 (1.
03-10.
50); p=0.
05), and brain/nervous system(OR 5.
19 (1.
89-14.
20); p<0.
001).
In Geisinger, ACD carriers with c.
488A>G had an increasedrisk of eye and orbit cancers (OR 15.
27 (2.
10-111.
00); p=0.
007), although there was only onecarrier.
The number of cancer events among individuals with TERF1, TERF2, and TERF2IPvariants was insufficient for statistical analyses.
Conclusion:
In Geisinger, prevalence of rare P/LP shelterin gene variants was generally higherthan in UKB, reflecting the clinically enriched nature of that cohort.
TINF2 had variants with thestrongest cancer associations.
Longitudinal studies of younger cohorts are warranted to refineprevalence estimates and cancer risk associated with shelterin complex genes.
Citation Format:
Hasset Nurelegne, Akanksha Nagarkar, Jung Kim, Douglas Stewart, Sharon Savage, Kelvin C.
De Andrade, .
Defining cancer risk germline variants in shelterin complex genes - a genome-first analysis [abstract].
In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA.
Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3597.
Related Results
Abstract 4891: Genome-first approach identifies shelterin complex gene variants and associated cancers
Abstract 4891: Genome-first approach identifies shelterin complex gene variants and associated cancers
Abstract
Telomeres, nucleotide repeats and a six-protein complex called shelterin at chromosome ends, are critical for genomic integrity. Rare heterozygous pathogeni...
Leveraging cancer mutation data to predict the pathogenicity of germline missense variants
Leveraging cancer mutation data to predict the pathogenicity of germline missense variants
ABSTRACTInnovative and easy-to-implement strategies are needed to improve the pathogenicity assessment of rare germline missense variants. Somatic cancer driver mutations identifie...
Abstract OI-1: OI-1 Decoding breast cancer predisposition genes
Abstract OI-1: OI-1 Decoding breast cancer predisposition genes
Abstract
Women with one or more first-degree female relatives with a history of breast cancer have a two-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer. This risk i...
Abstract 4177: Genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes in Algerian patients: A multicenter study
Abstract 4177: Genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes in Algerian patients: A multicenter study
Abstract
Background To date, 5% to 6 % of all colorectal cancers (CRCs) are associated with germline pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes that confer i...
FGF independent MEK1/2 signalling is essential for male fetal germline development in mice
FGF independent MEK1/2 signalling is essential for male fetal germline development in mice
Abstract
Background
Germline development provides the founding cells for spermatogenesis and oogenesis in ...
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract
A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
Distinct mutational landscapes when comparing germline and somatic cancer variants in forty tumor suppressor genes
Distinct mutational landscapes when comparing germline and somatic cancer variants in forty tumor suppressor genes
Abstract
Germline and somatic cancer variants in tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) share loss of function mechanisms with studies of a few genes (
...
Abstract 1451: BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutational spectrum in Algerian triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients
Abstract 1451: BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutational spectrum in Algerian triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer is currently the leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality among Algerian women. To date, triple negative breast cancer (TNB...

