Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A Syntactic Analysis of Raising Structures in Kĩmũthambĩ
View through CrossRef
This paper provides a syntactic analysis of noun phrase movement in raising predicates in Kĩmũthambĩ, a Bantu language, spoken in Kenya. Kĩmũthambĩ belongs to the larger Kikuyu-Kamba group (E50) and is classified as E531 Mwimbi-Muthambi by Eberhard et al. (2022). The study is guided by the Minimalist Program developed by Chomsky (1995). This theory recognizes that there is always a trigger movement which is the need to check features at an appropriate landing site. The paper demonstrates that Raising in Kĩmũthambĩ is triggered by the need to check case features. Since raising verbs cannot assign case to a NP, the NP must move to a position in a sentence where it can be assigned case. This according to Carnie (2007) is due to the fact that the NP and the case assigner must be local in such a way that it must be the specifier or the complement of the case assigner, in order to check the feature of case. Case therefore becomes a mandatory trigger for movement of NPs that are not in positions that can be assigned case as in the case of raising predicates. The paper also demonstrates that unlike in English where raising occurs on non-finite clauses only, Kĩmũthambĩ allows raising of subjects out finite clauses a situation referred to as hyper-raising. This study contributes to the study of Kĩmũthambĩ, a language that has had little research attention. It also contributes to the body of knowledge on raising structures in Bantu languages.
Title: A Syntactic Analysis of Raising Structures in Kĩmũthambĩ
Description:
This paper provides a syntactic analysis of noun phrase movement in raising predicates in Kĩmũthambĩ, a Bantu language, spoken in Kenya.
Kĩmũthambĩ belongs to the larger Kikuyu-Kamba group (E50) and is classified as E531 Mwimbi-Muthambi by Eberhard et al.
(2022).
The study is guided by the Minimalist Program developed by Chomsky (1995).
This theory recognizes that there is always a trigger movement which is the need to check features at an appropriate landing site.
The paper demonstrates that Raising in Kĩmũthambĩ is triggered by the need to check case features.
Since raising verbs cannot assign case to a NP, the NP must move to a position in a sentence where it can be assigned case.
This according to Carnie (2007) is due to the fact that the NP and the case assigner must be local in such a way that it must be the specifier or the complement of the case assigner, in order to check the feature of case.
Case therefore becomes a mandatory trigger for movement of NPs that are not in positions that can be assigned case as in the case of raising predicates.
The paper also demonstrates that unlike in English where raising occurs on non-finite clauses only, Kĩmũthambĩ allows raising of subjects out finite clauses a situation referred to as hyper-raising.
This study contributes to the study of Kĩmũthambĩ, a language that has had little research attention.
It also contributes to the body of knowledge on raising structures in Bantu languages.
Related Results
THE SYNTACTIC UNIT (FROM DEFINITION TO MODELLING)
THE SYNTACTIC UNIT (FROM DEFINITION TO MODELLING)
Background. In the article the vital questions of syntax of the present-day Ukrainian language are touched, syntax represents the top stratum of language organization and in itscom...
SYNTACTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF ADVERTISING DISCOURSE
SYNTACTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF ADVERTISING DISCOURSE
The article highlights three key syntactic characteristics of advertising discourse, analyzed on the basis of English-language advertising texts of non-specific thematic affiliatio...
ANALYSIS OF SYNTACTIC ERRORS IN ESL/EFL CONTEXTS: A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF COMMON ERROR PATTERNS AND CAUSES
ANALYSIS OF SYNTACTIC ERRORS IN ESL/EFL CONTEXTS: A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF COMMON ERROR PATTERNS AND CAUSES
The syntactic errors are one of the most prominent and frequently occurred error types among phonological, lexical, morphological, semantic, and orthographic errors in ESL/EFL cont...
SYNTACTIC PROCESSES AND PHENOMENA OF GRAMMATICALIZATION, IDIOMATIZATION AND ANALYTICIZATION
SYNTACTIC PROCESSES AND PHENOMENA OF GRAMMATICALIZATION, IDIOMATIZATION AND ANALYTICIZATION
The article examines the syntactic processes of re-decomposition, simplification, contamination, contraction and ellipsis in relation to the phenomena of grammaticalization, idioma...
SYNTACTIC CONSTRUCTIONS: SOURCES, PATHS, MEANS AND MECHANISM OF GRAMMATICALIZATION
SYNTACTIC CONSTRUCTIONS: SOURCES, PATHS, MEANS AND MECHANISM OF GRAMMATICALIZATION
The article examines the phenomenon of grammaticalization on the material of syntactic constructions. The authors reveal the sources (linguistic means) of grammaticalization, their...
Lack of selectivity for syntax relative to word meanings throughout the language network
Lack of selectivity for syntax relative to word meanings throughout the language network
Abstract
To understand what you are reading now, your mind retrieves the meanings of words and constructions from a linguistic knowledge store (l...
Where is syntactic variation?
Where is syntactic variation?
This paper discusses the consequences of some major recent developments in syntactic variation research: (i) the shift from a macro-comparative to a micro-comparative approach; (i...
Abnormal neural responses to harmonic syntactic structures in congenital amusia
Abnormal neural responses to harmonic syntactic structures in congenital amusia
AbstractIn music, harmonic syntactic structures are organized hierarchically through local and long‐distance dependencies. This study investigated whether congenital amusia, a neur...

