Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Communication and Collective Memory
View through CrossRef
The term “collective memory” refers to the shared meaning a group of people gives the past. Research on the phenomenon is highly interdisciplinary; collective memory is studied in at least five major academic disciplines: communication, sociology, psychology, history, and anthropology. It is also studied around the globe, with major research literatures in French, German, and Hebrew as well as in English, and case studies ranging across an even greater diversity of communities. The literature’s richness has given rise to several terms referring to essentially the same phenomenon: shared memory, public memory, social memory, and cultural memory. What distinguishes work on collective memory and communication is its emphasis on the production and circulation of shared meaning rather than the specific discipline in which the work is produced. Scholarship in collective memory usually adopts a social-constructionist perspective. Meanings assigned to the past are dynamic and commonly influenced by current circumstances. Scholars explore the limits of social construction in the context of past events that actually occurred, debate the ethics of representation, and theorize the social and technological forces affecting the production and circulation of shared meaning. However, critiques of representation grounded solely in their historical inaccuracies have largely been abandoned as theoretically unproductive. This article offers an overview of the field’s richness rather than an exhaustive listing of all the research that has been done. It is not limited to work produced by communication scholars but instead includes research generated in a variety of disciplines that speaks to the ways we develop and convey shared meanings for the past. Thus, it identifies literature flowing from differing conceptualizations of collective memory and considers the communicative aspects of a variety of social objects and practices, from film and journalism to memorials and museums. It also includes work on how collective memory functions in social life. Embracing the global nature of scholarship on collective memory, studies conducted in communities around the world are included. However, only work available in English is included, which means some evolving European approaches to communication and collective memory may be absent or referred to in secondary sources.
Title: Communication and Collective Memory
Description:
The term “collective memory” refers to the shared meaning a group of people gives the past.
Research on the phenomenon is highly interdisciplinary; collective memory is studied in at least five major academic disciplines: communication, sociology, psychology, history, and anthropology.
It is also studied around the globe, with major research literatures in French, German, and Hebrew as well as in English, and case studies ranging across an even greater diversity of communities.
The literature’s richness has given rise to several terms referring to essentially the same phenomenon: shared memory, public memory, social memory, and cultural memory.
What distinguishes work on collective memory and communication is its emphasis on the production and circulation of shared meaning rather than the specific discipline in which the work is produced.
Scholarship in collective memory usually adopts a social-constructionist perspective.
Meanings assigned to the past are dynamic and commonly influenced by current circumstances.
Scholars explore the limits of social construction in the context of past events that actually occurred, debate the ethics of representation, and theorize the social and technological forces affecting the production and circulation of shared meaning.
However, critiques of representation grounded solely in their historical inaccuracies have largely been abandoned as theoretically unproductive.
This article offers an overview of the field’s richness rather than an exhaustive listing of all the research that has been done.
It is not limited to work produced by communication scholars but instead includes research generated in a variety of disciplines that speaks to the ways we develop and convey shared meanings for the past.
Thus, it identifies literature flowing from differing conceptualizations of collective memory and considers the communicative aspects of a variety of social objects and practices, from film and journalism to memorials and museums.
It also includes work on how collective memory functions in social life.
Embracing the global nature of scholarship on collective memory, studies conducted in communities around the world are included.
However, only work available in English is included, which means some evolving European approaches to communication and collective memory may be absent or referred to in secondary sources.
Related Results
Analysis of Types in Business Communication using the TOPSIS Method
Analysis of Types in Business Communication using the TOPSIS Method
Information interchange between employees and others outside the corporation is referred to as business communication. To accomplish organizational objectives, managers and staff i...
Collective Efficacy and Teacher Collective Efficacy
Collective Efficacy and Teacher Collective Efficacy
Efficacy is a person’s degree of beliefs and confidence to implement a task and produce a positive change. Efficacy can be divided into two aspects, namely self-efficacy and collec...
Communication Management
Communication Management
The question of what comprises communication management has caused numerous discussions among communication scholars representing different theoretical and disciplinary angles. Com...
Le préjudice collectif des créanciers d'une procédure collective
Le préjudice collectif des créanciers d'une procédure collective
L’ouverture d’une procédure collective modifie les relations que le débiteur entretient avec ses créanciers. D’abord, l’entreprise du débiteur est placée sous protection de la just...
Teacher leadership and collective efficacy: teacher perceptions in three US school districts
Teacher leadership and collective efficacy: teacher perceptions in three US school districts
Purpose
– Collective efficacy and teacher leadership, two constructs central to school reform, were examined in this quantitative study of three school districts. T...
Material specific memory changes following anterior temporal lobectomy as predicted by the intracarotid amobarbital test
Material specific memory changes following anterior temporal lobectomy as predicted by the intracarotid amobarbital test
Temporal Lobe Epilepsy often remains refractory to drug therapy, at which time anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) may be considered. Left anterior temporal lobectomy (LATL) has been...
A Red Light Sabre to Go, and Other Histories of the Present
A Red Light Sabre to Go, and Other Histories of the Present
If I find out that you have bought a $90 red light sabre, Tara, well there's going to be trouble. -- Kevin Brabazon
A few Saturdays ago, my 71-year old father tried to...
Neuronal circuitry and molecular mechanisms regulating memory engrams in health and Alzheimer’s disease
Neuronal circuitry and molecular mechanisms regulating memory engrams in health and Alzheimer’s disease
Memories are the basis of our existence and shape who we are. Understanding how and where memories are stored has been a central focus of neuroscience research for more than a cent...

