Comparative Assessment of the Effect of Positioning Techniques and Ground Control Point Distribution Models on the Accuracy of UAV-Based Photogrammetric Production

Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) systems have recently become essential for mapping, surveying, and three-dimensional (3D) modeling applications. These systems are capable of providing highly accurate products through integrated advanced technologies, including a digital camera, inertial measurement unit (IMU), and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). UAVs are a cost-effective alternative to traditional aerial photogrammetry, and recent advancements demonstrate their effectiveness in many applications. In UAV-based photogrammetry, ground control points (GCPs) are utilized for georeferencing to enhance positioning precision. The distribution, number, and location of GCPs in the study area play a crucial role in determining the accuracy of photogrammetric products. This research evaluates the accuracy of positioning techniques for image acquisition for photogrammetric production and the effect of GCP distribution models. The camera position was determined using real-time kinematic (RTK), post-processed kinematic (PPK), and precise point positioning-ambiguity resolution (PPP-AR) techniques. In the criteria for determining the GCPs, six models were established within the İstanbul Technical University, Ayazaga Campus. To assess the accuracy of the points in these models, the horizontal, vertical, and 3D root mean square error (RMSE) values were calculated, holding the test points stationary in place. In the study, 2.5 cm horizontal RMSE and 3.0 cm vertical RMSE were obtained with the model containing five homogeneous GCPs by the indirect georeferencing method. The highest RMSE values of all three components in RTK, PPK, and PPP-AR methods were obtained without GCPs. For all six models, all techniques have an error value of sub-decimeter. The PPP-AR technique yields error values that are comparable to those of the other techniques. The PPP-AR appears to be an alternative to RTK and PPK, which usually require infrastructure, labor, and higher costs.