Javascript must be enabled to continue!
McGurk doesn’t work: Individual differences and task demands explain the McGurk illusion
View through CrossRef
Visual speech cues play an important role in speech recognition, and the McGurk effect is a classic demonstration of this. In the original McGurk and MacDonald (1976) experiment, 98% of participants reported an illusory “fusion” percept of /d/ when listening to the spoken syllable /b/ and watching the visual speech movements for /g/. However, recent work (e.g., Mallick et al., 2015) shows that subject and task differences influence the proportion of fusion responses. In the current study, we varied task (forced-choice versus open-ended), stimuli (synthetic versus naturally produced), design (mixed versus blocked audio-visual and single-modality trials), and data collection environment (lab versus Mechanical Turk) to investigate the robustness of the McGurk effect. Across all conditions, we found a low number of fusion responses. Rather than a robust perceptual illusion, we therefore argue that the McGurk effect is a product of individual differences and task demands.
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
Title: McGurk doesn’t work: Individual differences and task demands explain the McGurk illusion
Description:
Visual speech cues play an important role in speech recognition, and the McGurk effect is a classic demonstration of this.
In the original McGurk and MacDonald (1976) experiment, 98% of participants reported an illusory “fusion” percept of /d/ when listening to the spoken syllable /b/ and watching the visual speech movements for /g/.
However, recent work (e.
g.
, Mallick et al.
, 2015) shows that subject and task differences influence the proportion of fusion responses.
In the current study, we varied task (forced-choice versus open-ended), stimuli (synthetic versus naturally produced), design (mixed versus blocked audio-visual and single-modality trials), and data collection environment (lab versus Mechanical Turk) to investigate the robustness of the McGurk effect.
Across all conditions, we found a low number of fusion responses.
Rather than a robust perceptual illusion, we therefore argue that the McGurk effect is a product of individual differences and task demands.
Related Results
Depth Cue Integration is Cognitive Rather than Perceptual: Linton Un-Hollow Face Illusion and Linton Morphing Face Illusion
Depth Cue Integration is Cognitive Rather than Perceptual: Linton Un-Hollow Face Illusion and Linton Morphing Face Illusion
We present two new versions of the Hollow Face Illusion that challenge our understanding of depth cue integration. Traditional accounts of depth cue integration operate at the leve...
Depth Cue Integration is Cognitive Rather than Perceptual: Linton Un-Hollow Face Illusion and Linton Morphing Face Illusion
Depth Cue Integration is Cognitive Rather than Perceptual: Linton Un-Hollow Face Illusion and Linton Morphing Face Illusion
We present two new versions of the Hollow Face Illusion that challenge our understanding of depth cue integration. Traditional accounts of depth cue integration operate at the leve...
A static paradigm based on illusion-induced VEP for brain-computer interfaces
A static paradigm based on illusion-induced VEP for brain-computer interfaces
Abstract
Objective. Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) have been commonly applied in brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) due to their satisfactory class...
Les illusions McGurk dans la parole : 25 ans de recherches
Les illusions McGurk dans la parole : 25 ans de recherches
Summary : The McGurk illusions in speech: 25years of research.
When presented with an auditory /b/ dubbed onto a visual /g/, listeners perceive sometimes a fused phoneme like ...
Profesionalne kompetencije odgajatelja za rad u dječjem domu
Profesionalne kompetencije odgajatelja za rad u dječjem domu
The paper deals with the professional competences of educators employed in children's homes where children and young people without parents or without adequate parental care are ra...
Configural Processing Hypothesis and Face-Inversion Effect
Configural Processing Hypothesis and Face-Inversion Effect
Perception and recognition of faces presented upright are better than Perception and recognition of faces presented inverted. The difference between upright and inverted orientatio...
Linton Stereo Illusion: Response on Johnston (1991)
Linton Stereo Illusion: Response on Johnston (1991)
In (Linton, 2024) I present a new illusion (the ‘Linton Stereo Illusion’) that challenges our understanding of stereo vision. A vision scientist has shared their own analysis of th...
The McGurk Effect Across Languages
The McGurk Effect Across Languages
The McGurk effect denotes a phenomenon of speech perception where a listener attends to mismatched audio and visual stimuli and perceives an illusory third sound, typically a confl...

