Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Lawrence Welk
View through CrossRef
This essay explores the musical politics of Lawrence Welk, the bandleader whose television show was a mainstay of American popular culture from 1955 through 1982. I argue that Welk’s interests in gender, family, and work—both philosophically and musically—reveal the maestro as a harbinger of late twentieth-century political and cultural discourse. I focus on Welk’s transition (around 1970–1973) from his trademark champagne sound—which featured woodwinds and ornamentation—to a “Big Band Sound,” which emphasized the unison open brass. Around the same time, he stopped referring to his ensemble as “The Champagne Music Makers” and began calling them his “Musical Family.” I argue that his “Big Band Sound” was in fact a musical articulation of his “Musical Family”—and that Welk instituted both of these changes in response to what he perceived as the decline of American work ethic and sexual morality. I suggest that Welk’s champagne sound, which once signified whiteness, was now feminized and seen as emblematic of indolent hedonism. He sought to purge this feminization—and this aversion to work—precisely by adopting the more “masculine” brassy sound. I also show how he deployed family acts—and his managerial scheme of a “Family Plan”—to promote his conservative ideals about work and the family. In this way, Welk provided the sound of the Nixonian “silent majority.” I conclude by noting how three elements of Welk’s show—his fondness for mistakes, the emphasis on visual spectacle, and the erratic temporality of syndication—provide the potential for a counter-reading of his efforts.
Title: Lawrence Welk
Description:
This essay explores the musical politics of Lawrence Welk, the bandleader whose television show was a mainstay of American popular culture from 1955 through 1982.
I argue that Welk’s interests in gender, family, and work—both philosophically and musically—reveal the maestro as a harbinger of late twentieth-century political and cultural discourse.
I focus on Welk’s transition (around 1970–1973) from his trademark champagne sound—which featured woodwinds and ornamentation—to a “Big Band Sound,” which emphasized the unison open brass.
Around the same time, he stopped referring to his ensemble as “The Champagne Music Makers” and began calling them his “Musical Family.
” I argue that his “Big Band Sound” was in fact a musical articulation of his “Musical Family”—and that Welk instituted both of these changes in response to what he perceived as the decline of American work ethic and sexual morality.
I suggest that Welk’s champagne sound, which once signified whiteness, was now feminized and seen as emblematic of indolent hedonism.
He sought to purge this feminization—and this aversion to work—precisely by adopting the more “masculine” brassy sound.
I also show how he deployed family acts—and his managerial scheme of a “Family Plan”—to promote his conservative ideals about work and the family.
In this way, Welk provided the sound of the Nixonian “silent majority.
” I conclude by noting how three elements of Welk’s show—his fondness for mistakes, the emphasis on visual spectacle, and the erratic temporality of syndication—provide the potential for a counter-reading of his efforts.
Related Results
De billijke vergoeding: welk geval wordt met welk geval vergeleken?
De billijke vergoeding: welk geval wordt met welk geval vergeleken?
De billijke vergoeding: welk geval wordt met welk geval vergeleken?
Het vaststellen van de hoogte van de billijke vergoeding is door de wetgever aan de rechter overgelate...
Lawrence, Douglas Goldring, and Plays for a People’s Theatre
Lawrence, Douglas Goldring, and Plays for a People’s Theatre
In 1920 Thomas Seltzer published D.H. Lawrence’s Touch and Go and Douglas Goldring’s The Fight for Freedom as Plays for a People’s Theatre by Thomas Seltzer. The contemporary revie...
D.H. Lawrence And Cornwall
D.H. Lawrence And Cornwall
This book examines D.H. Lawrence’s attempt to create a utopian community of likeminded idealists in Cornwall, a quest that was given greater urgency by the outbreak of the First Wo...
Lawrence in Biofiction
Lawrence in Biofiction
This chapter explores the ways in which Lawrence and the ‘Lawrentian type’ is represented in biofiction from 1916 to 2018. The first sections assess pen portraits of Lawrence in th...
D.H. Lawrence, Lady Chatterley’s Lover and “Popular” Editions
D.H. Lawrence, Lady Chatterley’s Lover and “Popular” Editions
In “Accumulated Mail” (1925) Lawrence wrote that “it’s no fun, writing unpopular books” (RDP 239). But he was keen to see his books sold. When Lady Chatterley’s Lover (1928) was wi...
‘Rather a complicated person’: indexing T. E. Lawrence (Lawrence of Arabia)
‘Rather a complicated person’: indexing T. E. Lawrence (Lawrence of Arabia)
Hazel K. Bell recounts the extraordinary difficulties and delays she faced in indexing Jeremy Wilson’s
Authorised biography of T. E. Lawrence
...
D. H. Lawrence
D. H. Lawrence
Since his death in 1930, D. H. Lawrence has become not only one of the most controversial English novelists of the twentieth century, but also one of the most widely read and quote...
‘My dear Garnett … why do you take so much trouble for me?’: Edward Garnett, ‘Friend and Protector’
‘My dear Garnett … why do you take so much trouble for me?’: Edward Garnett, ‘Friend and Protector’
Arguing that traditional criticism on Lawrence’s literary career has studied certain figures such as the publisher’s reader Edward Garnett largely in one-dimensional terms, Chapter...

