Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Legal Politics of the President's Grant of Lesion Basedon the Perspective of Justice and Humanity in the Indonesian Judicial System
View through CrossRef
This research aims to explore and understand the legal politics behind granting a Pardon by the President of Indonesia in the justice system and the factors influencing the decision to grant a Pardon. The research method used is normative legal research, which focuses on positive legal analysis, legal principles, and legal doctrine. The approach usedincludes a statutory approach to analyze related regulations and a conceptual approach. The research results show thatGranting a Pardon by the President is a constitutional right that the President has without interference from other institutions. After the amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of IndonesiafourthSometimes there are restrictions on the President's powers, which are considered too broad, and to prevent authoritarianism from the President. In line with these changes, especially in granting pardons, the President must pay attention to the considerations of the Supreme Court. This is not an intervention by the President in the Judiciary institution. However, with a checks and balances mechanism, the President has the basis for consideration from the institution concerned even though the decision to grant it is purely based on the President's constitutional rights
International Journal of Research in Social Science & Humanities
Title: Legal Politics of the President's Grant of Lesion Basedon the Perspective of Justice and Humanity in the Indonesian Judicial System
Description:
This research aims to explore and understand the legal politics behind granting a Pardon by the President of Indonesia in the justice system and the factors influencing the decision to grant a Pardon.
The research method used is normative legal research, which focuses on positive legal analysis, legal principles, and legal doctrine.
The approach usedincludes a statutory approach to analyze related regulations and a conceptual approach.
The research results show thatGranting a Pardon by the President is a constitutional right that the President has without interference from other institutions.
After the amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of IndonesiafourthSometimes there are restrictions on the President's powers, which are considered too broad, and to prevent authoritarianism from the President.
In line with these changes, especially in granting pardons, the President must pay attention to the considerations of the Supreme Court.
This is not an intervention by the President in the Judiciary institution.
However, with a checks and balances mechanism, the President has the basis for consideration from the institution concerned even though the decision to grant it is purely based on the President's constitutional rights.
Related Results
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
This study examines the evolving role of the judiciary in Pakistan in interpreting the Constitution, exploring how the courts have come to terms with their position as the primary ...
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com
Abstract
Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
The Concept of Humanity in International Criminal Law
The Concept of Humanity in International Criminal Law
The Concept of Humanity in International Criminal Law
It is difficult to find a more ambiguous and multifaceted category than the concept of humanity. This is all the mor...
Populisme Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Penafsiran Perkara-Perkara pada Wilayah Open Legal Policy
Populisme Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Penafsiran Perkara-Perkara pada Wilayah Open Legal Policy
In the past seven years, the striking characteristic of cases filed before the Constitutional Court (MK) has developed into cases at the open legal policy level. In open legal case...
Judicial constitutional review and the transformation of modern constitutionalism: problems of harmonization and development
Judicial constitutional review and the transformation of modern constitutionalism: problems of harmonization and development
The relevance of the research topic lies in the significance of judicial constitutional review as a key institution that ensures stability and development of the constitutional ord...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Judicial Review Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint dalam Perspektif Kebebasan Kehakiman
Judicial Review Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint dalam Perspektif Kebebasan Kehakiman
The discourse between the application of judicial activism or judicial restraint has become a hot issue of judicial review authority where recently the Constitutional Court through...

