Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Health indicators as measures of individual health status, perceived importance, and their associated factors—an observational study

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Self-rated health status, a subjective measure, is used broadly to describe an individual’s overall health status. Our long-term goal is to create a more objective, comprehensive, and accurate measure of individual health status. We selected 29 health indicators and prioritized them by conducting online surveys. Thirteen of these 29 indicators received relatively more consistent ratings across 3 samples. Objectives To explore the main and interaction effects of 4 demographic factors as independent variables (age, gender, professional group, and educational level) in the importance ratings of the 13 health indicators. Methods We conducted a 4-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) with post-hoc testing to examine the effects of independent variables on all 13 dependent variables. Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlation analysis were also conducted. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting An online survey (≥ 18 years). Participants 791 participants in the USA. Results 13 health indicators were significantly correlated with each other. Age correlated with most of the health indicators (8 of 13). The MANOVA modeling results indicated that gender, age, and education levels significantly affected the combination of the 13 health indicators. There was a significant interaction effect by age and professional group on 5 health indicators. Conclusions Age is critical in rating the 13 health indicators. Among all the statistically significant main effects of demographic factors, the effect sizes descend regarding age, gender, educational level, and interaction between age and professional group. These results can provide a foundation for further studies to explore behavioral interventions for individual subgroups. Article Summary Strengths and limitations of this study The work establishes the interactions and effects between demographic data (age, gender, education, and professional group) and the perceived importance of 13 health indicators via MANOVA analysis The interactions and effects of demographic data on the importance ratings of the 13 health indicators can guide future study designs for behavioral interventions Deep analysis of the demographic variables and their effects on and interactions with the rating results are helpful for thoroughly understanding the perspectives The study is an observational study despite with relatively large sample size and a robust analysis The data are not racially representative
Title: Health indicators as measures of individual health status, perceived importance, and their associated factors—an observational study
Description:
Abstract Background Self-rated health status, a subjective measure, is used broadly to describe an individual’s overall health status.
Our long-term goal is to create a more objective, comprehensive, and accurate measure of individual health status.
We selected 29 health indicators and prioritized them by conducting online surveys.
Thirteen of these 29 indicators received relatively more consistent ratings across 3 samples.
Objectives To explore the main and interaction effects of 4 demographic factors as independent variables (age, gender, professional group, and educational level) in the importance ratings of the 13 health indicators.
Methods We conducted a 4-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) with post-hoc testing to examine the effects of independent variables on all 13 dependent variables.
Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlation analysis were also conducted.
Design Cross-sectional study.
Setting An online survey (≥ 18 years).
Participants 791 participants in the USA.
Results 13 health indicators were significantly correlated with each other.
Age correlated with most of the health indicators (8 of 13).
The MANOVA modeling results indicated that gender, age, and education levels significantly affected the combination of the 13 health indicators.
There was a significant interaction effect by age and professional group on 5 health indicators.
Conclusions Age is critical in rating the 13 health indicators.
Among all the statistically significant main effects of demographic factors, the effect sizes descend regarding age, gender, educational level, and interaction between age and professional group.
These results can provide a foundation for further studies to explore behavioral interventions for individual subgroups.
Article Summary Strengths and limitations of this study The work establishes the interactions and effects between demographic data (age, gender, education, and professional group) and the perceived importance of 13 health indicators via MANOVA analysis The interactions and effects of demographic data on the importance ratings of the 13 health indicators can guide future study designs for behavioral interventions Deep analysis of the demographic variables and their effects on and interactions with the rating results are helpful for thoroughly understanding the perspectives The study is an observational study despite with relatively large sample size and a robust analysis The data are not racially representative.

Related Results

Perbedaan Perceived Susceptibility dan Severity Pelaksanaan Protokol Kesehatan Covid-19 Masyarakat Perkotaan dan Pedesaan
Perbedaan Perceived Susceptibility dan Severity Pelaksanaan Protokol Kesehatan Covid-19 Masyarakat Perkotaan dan Pedesaan
Abstract—Perceived Susceptibility is an individual's subjective perception of the risk of getting a disease, and Perceived Severity is information that a person believes about the ...
Indicators of infertility and fertility care: a systematic scoping review
Indicators of infertility and fertility care: a systematic scoping review
Abstract STUDY QUESTION What is the scope of literature regarding infertility and fertility care indicators in terms of types an...
Health indicators as a measure of individual health status: public perspectives
Health indicators as a measure of individual health status: public perspectives
Abstract Objective We examined the perspectives of the general public on 29 health indicators to provide evidence for further p...
Profesor Stanisław Batawia
Profesor Stanisław Batawia
 The editor-in-chief of „Archiwum Kryminologii”, professor Stanisław Batawia, full member of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Professor of Warsaw University and of the Institute of ...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Abstract The rapid growth of open access publishing (OAP) has significantly improved the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge. However, this expansion has also c...

Back to Top