Javascript must be enabled to continue!
High-quality functional genome annotation through an intercampus competition initiative
View through CrossRef
Ensuring high-quality functional annotations in newly sequenced genomes has become a fundamental problem in next-generation sequencing genomics. This problem takes additional relevance in bacteriophage genomics, where well-annotated reference genomes are scarce and often highly diverged from newly sequenced genomes. This makes automated annotation pipelines especially prone to introduce and propagate functional annotation errors, devaluing the contribution of sequencing projects to the understanding of bacteriophage biology and decreasing the likelihood that novel genetic mechanisms with industrial and clinical application can be mined from the extremely diverse genetic repertoire of bacteriophage genomes. Genome annotation by expert biocurators ensures high-quality annotations, but such approaches are hard to scale and raise financial sustainability issues. Here we show how undergraduate biology courses devoted to genome annotation can be leveraged to generate high-quality functional annotations of bacteriophage genomes by integrating targeted training within the framework of an intercampus annotation competition. Students receive advanced training on biological ontologies, orthology assessment methods, biocuration standards and critical reading of scientific manuscripts. Working in small teams, students then participate in the Community Assessment of Community Annotation with Ontologies (CACAO) intercampus competition, generating Gene Ontology (GO) annotations of bacteriophage and bacterial gene products and challenging the accuracy of annotations made by other teams in a pre-established set of innings for annotation, challenge and revision. Revised annotations are reviewed by an expert panel before submission to the Gene Ontology Consortium. This approach yields tangible benefits on many fronts. Students develop critical reading skills, get exposed to key concepts in genome biology and obtain essential hands-on experience on the use of ontologies and bioinformatics methods to assess orthology, synteny and other genetic features. Team-work in a competitive framework and intercampus rivalry motivate students to improve the accuracy of their annotations, leading to high-quality functional annotations on both reference and newly sequenced bacteriophage genomes.
Title: High-quality functional genome annotation through an intercampus competition initiative
Description:
Ensuring high-quality functional annotations in newly sequenced genomes has become a fundamental problem in next-generation sequencing genomics.
This problem takes additional relevance in bacteriophage genomics, where well-annotated reference genomes are scarce and often highly diverged from newly sequenced genomes.
This makes automated annotation pipelines especially prone to introduce and propagate functional annotation errors, devaluing the contribution of sequencing projects to the understanding of bacteriophage biology and decreasing the likelihood that novel genetic mechanisms with industrial and clinical application can be mined from the extremely diverse genetic repertoire of bacteriophage genomes.
Genome annotation by expert biocurators ensures high-quality annotations, but such approaches are hard to scale and raise financial sustainability issues.
Here we show how undergraduate biology courses devoted to genome annotation can be leveraged to generate high-quality functional annotations of bacteriophage genomes by integrating targeted training within the framework of an intercampus annotation competition.
Students receive advanced training on biological ontologies, orthology assessment methods, biocuration standards and critical reading of scientific manuscripts.
Working in small teams, students then participate in the Community Assessment of Community Annotation with Ontologies (CACAO) intercampus competition, generating Gene Ontology (GO) annotations of bacteriophage and bacterial gene products and challenging the accuracy of annotations made by other teams in a pre-established set of innings for annotation, challenge and revision.
Revised annotations are reviewed by an expert panel before submission to the Gene Ontology Consortium.
This approach yields tangible benefits on many fronts.
Students develop critical reading skills, get exposed to key concepts in genome biology and obtain essential hands-on experience on the use of ontologies and bioinformatics methods to assess orthology, synteny and other genetic features.
Team-work in a competitive framework and intercampus rivalry motivate students to improve the accuracy of their annotations, leading to high-quality functional annotations on both reference and newly sequenced bacteriophage genomes.
Related Results
An extensible genome annotation workbench based on the Galaxy Platform
An extensible genome annotation workbench based on the Galaxy Platform
Introduction
Falling costs of genetic sequencing have allowed sequencing and annotation of the genomes of non-model organism. In annotating non-mod...
Benchmarking Hayai-Annotation Plants: A Re-evaluation Using Standard Evaluation Metrics
Benchmarking Hayai-Annotation Plants: A Re-evaluation Using Standard Evaluation Metrics
Abstract
The rapid growth of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology has led to a surge in the determination of whole genome sequences in pla...
Galaxy Genome Annotation: Galaxy as a platform for the annotation of genomes
Galaxy Genome Annotation: Galaxy as a platform for the annotation of genomes
Galaxy Genome Annotation (GGA) is a project focusing on developments and resources to turn Galaxy into a complete and efficient platform for the structural and functional annotatio...
Galaxy Genome Annotation: Galaxy as a platform for the annotation of genomes
Galaxy Genome Annotation: Galaxy as a platform for the annotation of genomes
Galaxy Genome Annotation (GGA) is a project focusing on developments and resources to turn Galaxy into a complete and efficient platform for the structural and functional annotatio...
Hybran: Hybrid Reference Transfer and ab initio Prokaryotic Genome Annotation
Hybran: Hybrid Reference Transfer and ab initio Prokaryotic Genome Annotation
Abstract
De novo assembly has become commonplace for microbial organisms, increasing the demand for reliable genome annotation. Ab initio annotation is not an ideal...
Apollo: collaborative and scalable manual genome annotation
Apollo: collaborative and scalable manual genome annotation
Manual refinement of automated gene predictions using experimental evidence is a crucial step for improving the quality of a genome's annotation. Apollo, which utilizes the JBrowse...
FAMUS: A Few-Shot Learning Framework for Large-Scale Protein Annotation
FAMUS: A Few-Shot Learning Framework for Large-Scale Protein Annotation
Predicting gene function is a pivotal and challenging step in genomic and metagenomic data analysis. Current automatic annotation tools typically rely on the single most similar se...
Non-Homology-Based Prediction of Gene Functions
Non-Homology-Based Prediction of Gene Functions
Abstract
Advances in genome sequencing and annotation have eased the difficulty of identifying new gene sequences. Predicting the functions of these newly identifie...

