Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Legal Appraisal of Renewed Conflict between Israel and Hamas: Analysing the genocide accusations against Israel under International Law

View through CrossRef
This paper examines the recent escalation of the conflict between Israel and Hamas, which began dramatically on 7 October 2023. The widespread killings and abductions of Israelis by Hamas precipitated an unprecedented military response from the Israel Defence Forces (IDF), aimed at securing the return of those taken, whether alive or deceased. The IDF's military actions have led to considerable discussion regarding their potential genocidal implications for Palestinians. However, an analysis requires considering whether Israel is solely accountable for genocide, or if Hamas's actions on 7 October also carry genocidal implications for which perpetrators should be held legally responsible. Against this backdrop, this paper investigates the potential culpability of Israel for accusations of genocide and whether Hamas can be absolved of the same offence under international law. Specifically, it traces the historical antecedent of the Israel-Palestine conflict, appraises the international legal framework pertaining to genocide, and scrutinises the accusations of genocide against Israel, alongside Hamas's potential culpability for the same offence. The paper employs a doctrinal method of both, primary and secondary sources to facilitate analysis of issues surrounding genocide accusations against both Israel and Hamas, grounded in established international legal framework. It finds among other things, that both Israel and Hamas bear responsibility for the offence of genocide. The paper recommends, among other things, that Israel and Hamas should be ready to embrace reality on both sides and allow peace and humanitarian aids in Gaza.
Title: Legal Appraisal of Renewed Conflict between Israel and Hamas: Analysing the genocide accusations against Israel under International Law
Description:
This paper examines the recent escalation of the conflict between Israel and Hamas, which began dramatically on 7 October 2023.
The widespread killings and abductions of Israelis by Hamas precipitated an unprecedented military response from the Israel Defence Forces (IDF), aimed at securing the return of those taken, whether alive or deceased.
The IDF's military actions have led to considerable discussion regarding their potential genocidal implications for Palestinians.
However, an analysis requires considering whether Israel is solely accountable for genocide, or if Hamas's actions on 7 October also carry genocidal implications for which perpetrators should be held legally responsible.
Against this backdrop, this paper investigates the potential culpability of Israel for accusations of genocide and whether Hamas can be absolved of the same offence under international law.
Specifically, it traces the historical antecedent of the Israel-Palestine conflict, appraises the international legal framework pertaining to genocide, and scrutinises the accusations of genocide against Israel, alongside Hamas's potential culpability for the same offence.
The paper employs a doctrinal method of both, primary and secondary sources to facilitate analysis of issues surrounding genocide accusations against both Israel and Hamas, grounded in established international legal framework.
It finds among other things, that both Israel and Hamas bear responsibility for the offence of genocide.
The paper recommends, among other things, that Israel and Hamas should be ready to embrace reality on both sides and allow peace and humanitarian aids in Gaza.

Related Results

History of Genocides
History of Genocides
The textbook presents the mass killings and other atrocities that have occurred worldwide and have been defined as genocide by international tribunals, other international bodies, ...
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
METAPHORICAL REPRESENTATION OF THE CONCEPT CONFLICT IN AMERICAN AND BRITISH POLITICAL DISCOURSE (BASED ON IMAGE METAPHORS)
METAPHORICAL REPRESENTATION OF THE CONCEPT CONFLICT IN AMERICAN AND BRITISH POLITICAL DISCOURSE (BASED ON IMAGE METAPHORS)
The article is devoted to the metaphorical representation of the concept CONFLICT in the English-language political discourse, namely American and British. The figurative content o...
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
The study deal with selected problems of international law at the time of change of the 20th and 21st centuries. Such a milestone gives an opportunity to review the achieved state ...
International Construction Law
International Construction Law
International law is a body of legally binding norms that regulate relations between the subjects of the international legal system and structure the functioning of the internation...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Cultural Genocide in Law and Politics
Cultural Genocide in Law and Politics
The violent and nonviolent repression of cultural groups, or using cultural means to destroy a group, is often identified as “cultural genocide.” The concept’s association with gen...

Back to Top