Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Prioritisation of Informed Health Choices (IHC) Key Concepts to be included in lower-secondary school resources: a consensus study
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
The Informed Health Choices Key Concepts are principles for thinking critically about healthcare claims and deciding what to do. The Key Concepts provide a framework for designing curricula, learning resources, and evaluation tools.
Objectives
To prioritise which of the 49 Key Concepts to include in resources for lower-secondary schools in East Africa.
Methods
Twelve judges used an iterative process to reach a consensus. The judges were curriculum specialists, teachers, and researchers from Kenya, Uganda, and Rwanda. After familiarising themselves with the concepts, they pilot tested draft criteria for selecting and ordering the concepts. After agreeing on the criteria, nine judges independently assessed all 49 concepts and reached an initial consensus. We sought feedback on the draft consensus from teachers and other stakeholders. After considering the feedback, nine judges independently reassessed the prioritised concepts and reached a consensus. The final set of concepts was determined after user-testing prototypes and pilot-testing the resources.
Results
The first panel prioritised 29 concepts. Based on feedback from teachers, students, curriculum developers, and other members of the research team, two concepts were dropped. A second panel of nine judges prioritised 17 of the 27 concepts. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic and school closures, we have only been able to develop one set of resources instead of two, as originally planned. Based on feedback on prototypes of lessons and pilot-testing a set of 10 lessons, we determined that it was possible to introduce nine concepts in 10 single-period (40 minute) lessons. We included eight of the 17 prioritised concepts and one additional concept.
Conclusion
Using an iterative process with explicit criteria, we prioritised nine concepts as a starting point for students to learn to think critically about healthcare claims and choices.
Title: Prioritisation of Informed Health Choices (IHC) Key Concepts to be included in lower-secondary school resources: a consensus study
Description:
Abstract
Background
The Informed Health Choices Key Concepts are principles for thinking critically about healthcare claims and deciding what to do.
The Key Concepts provide a framework for designing curricula, learning resources, and evaluation tools.
Objectives
To prioritise which of the 49 Key Concepts to include in resources for lower-secondary schools in East Africa.
Methods
Twelve judges used an iterative process to reach a consensus.
The judges were curriculum specialists, teachers, and researchers from Kenya, Uganda, and Rwanda.
After familiarising themselves with the concepts, they pilot tested draft criteria for selecting and ordering the concepts.
After agreeing on the criteria, nine judges independently assessed all 49 concepts and reached an initial consensus.
We sought feedback on the draft consensus from teachers and other stakeholders.
After considering the feedback, nine judges independently reassessed the prioritised concepts and reached a consensus.
The final set of concepts was determined after user-testing prototypes and pilot-testing the resources.
Results
The first panel prioritised 29 concepts.
Based on feedback from teachers, students, curriculum developers, and other members of the research team, two concepts were dropped.
A second panel of nine judges prioritised 17 of the 27 concepts.
Due to the Covid-19 pandemic and school closures, we have only been able to develop one set of resources instead of two, as originally planned.
Based on feedback on prototypes of lessons and pilot-testing a set of 10 lessons, we determined that it was possible to introduce nine concepts in 10 single-period (40 minute) lessons.
We included eight of the 17 prioritised concepts and one additional concept.
Conclusion
Using an iterative process with explicit criteria, we prioritised nine concepts as a starting point for students to learn to think critically about healthcare claims and choices.
Related Results
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Trooping the (School) Colour
Trooping the (School) Colour
Introduction
Throughout the early and mid-twentieth century, cadet training was a feature of many secondary schools and educational establishments across Australia, with countless ...
Pathological Response to Herceptin-containing Neoadjuvant Therapy in HER2 IHC2+/ISH+ and IHC3+ Early-Stage Invasive Ductal Carcinoma
Pathological Response to Herceptin-containing Neoadjuvant Therapy in HER2 IHC2+/ISH+ and IHC3+ Early-Stage Invasive Ductal Carcinoma
ABSTRACTBackground:HER2-positive breast cancers exhibit heterogeneous responses to neoadjuvant therapy. This study compared pathologic response between IHC 3+ and IHC 2+/ISH+ invas...
Surveying prioritisation for emergency surgery - do the specialties involved agree?
Surveying prioritisation for emergency surgery - do the specialties involved agree?
Abstract
Background
Surgical resources are often shared across medical specialties, which can lead to conflicts over prio...
Comparative Analysis of HER2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Brightfield Dual-Color In Situ Hybridization (DISH) in Lymph Node Metastasized Breast Cancer
Comparative Analysis of HER2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Brightfield Dual-Color In Situ Hybridization (DISH) in Lymph Node Metastasized Breast Cancer
Abstract
Background
The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene encodes a tyrosine kinase receptor, implicated in 15–20% of breast cancers. HER2 amplification...
HER2 status testing by immunohistochemical and fFluorescence in situ hybridization in China
HER2 status testing by immunohistochemical and fFluorescence in situ hybridization in China
e22233 Background: HER2 gene overexpression is associated with aggressive breast cancer and poor clinical prognosis. Humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab, which is ...
Assessment of HER2 Status of Metastatic Breast Carcinoma on Cell Block Preparations of Fine Needle Aspirates is Unreliable
Assessment of HER2 Status of Metastatic Breast Carcinoma on Cell Block Preparations of Fine Needle Aspirates is Unreliable
Objectives: HER2 status of breast carcinoma is a powerful prognostic and predictive biomarker-particularly in the metastatic setting. Limited data is available regarding assessment...
Wyniki badań 110 dziewcząt “nie uczących się i nie pracujących”
Wyniki badań 110 dziewcząt “nie uczących się i nie pracujących”
The publication presents the findings of an inquiry conducted among 110 girls aged 15 - 17 who had been directed, on the grounds of being “out of school and out of work”, to two on...

