Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

COMPARISON OF GLYCEMIC CONTROL ACTVITY OF SGLT2 INHIBITORS AND SULPHONYLUREAS IN PATIENTS OF DECOMPENSATED LIVER DISEASE

View through CrossRef
Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a well-established risk factor for worsening structural and biochemical parameters in decompensated chronic liver disease (DCLD), a condition with significant global morbidity and mortality (1,2). Poor glycemic control in DCLD increases the likelihood of complications such as hepatic encephalopathy, gastrointestinal bleeding, and ascites. Achieving optimal glycemic control is essential to slow disease progression, reduce complications, and improve survival outcomes. The selection of appropriate second-line oral antidiabetic drugs (ADDs) in this population remains a matter of clinical debate. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of sulphonylureas (SU) and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in achieving glycemic control in patients with DCLD. Methods: This longitudinal cross-sectional study was conducted at Combined Military Hospital Jhelum from May 2024 to January 2025. Using non-probability convenience sampling, 100 patients with DM and DCLD for at least one-year, inadequate glycemic control on metformin, and no major comorbidities were enrolled. Patients were assigned to either SU (n=50) or SGLT2 inhibitor (n=50) therapy. Baseline and 3-month follow-up assessments included fasting blood glucose (FBG), post-prandial glucose (PPG), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), serum creatinine, albumin, cholesterol, body weight, and hypoglycemia incidence. Data analysis was performed using SPSS v25 with chi-square test, considering p<0.05 as statistically significant. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between SU and SGLT2 groups in age (59.40±9.09 vs 59.96±9.54 years), BMI (29.32±1.53 vs 28.90±2.31 kg/m²), duration of DM (9.70±3.46 vs 10.00±1.93 years), and DCLD (9.16±2.92 vs 9.66±3.10 years). At 3 months, both groups showed reductions in FBG (204.80±25.54 to 175.50±28.32 vs 214.76±26.17 to 169.70±27.88 mg/dL, p=0.305) and PPG (238.02±28.99 to 222.78±25.95 vs 246.10±29.19 to 225.04±25.12 mg/dL, p=0.659), without significant intergroup difference. Hypoglycemia was more frequent in the SU group (16% vs 4%, p=0.046). ALT, albumin, and body weight changes were non-significant between groups. Conclusion: Both SU and SGLT2 inhibitors demonstrated comparable glycemic control in DCLD, though the lower hypoglycemia incidence with SGLT2 inhibitors suggests a safety advantage in patients with prior hypoglycemia.
Title: COMPARISON OF GLYCEMIC CONTROL ACTVITY OF SGLT2 INHIBITORS AND SULPHONYLUREAS IN PATIENTS OF DECOMPENSATED LIVER DISEASE
Description:
Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a well-established risk factor for worsening structural and biochemical parameters in decompensated chronic liver disease (DCLD), a condition with significant global morbidity and mortality (1,2).
Poor glycemic control in DCLD increases the likelihood of complications such as hepatic encephalopathy, gastrointestinal bleeding, and ascites.
Achieving optimal glycemic control is essential to slow disease progression, reduce complications, and improve survival outcomes.
The selection of appropriate second-line oral antidiabetic drugs (ADDs) in this population remains a matter of clinical debate.
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of sulphonylureas (SU) and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in achieving glycemic control in patients with DCLD.
Methods: This longitudinal cross-sectional study was conducted at Combined Military Hospital Jhelum from May 2024 to January 2025.
Using non-probability convenience sampling, 100 patients with DM and DCLD for at least one-year, inadequate glycemic control on metformin, and no major comorbidities were enrolled.
Patients were assigned to either SU (n=50) or SGLT2 inhibitor (n=50) therapy.
Baseline and 3-month follow-up assessments included fasting blood glucose (FBG), post-prandial glucose (PPG), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), serum creatinine, albumin, cholesterol, body weight, and hypoglycemia incidence.
Data analysis was performed using SPSS v25 with chi-square test, considering p<0.
05 as statistically significant.
Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between SU and SGLT2 groups in age (59.
40±9.
09 vs 59.
96±9.
54 years), BMI (29.
32±1.
53 vs 28.
90±2.
31 kg/m²), duration of DM (9.
70±3.
46 vs 10.
00±1.
93 years), and DCLD (9.
16±2.
92 vs 9.
66±3.
10 years).
At 3 months, both groups showed reductions in FBG (204.
80±25.
54 to 175.
50±28.
32 vs 214.
76±26.
17 to 169.
70±27.
88 mg/dL, p=0.
305) and PPG (238.
02±28.
99 to 222.
78±25.
95 vs 246.
10±29.
19 to 225.
04±25.
12 mg/dL, p=0.
659), without significant intergroup difference.
Hypoglycemia was more frequent in the SU group (16% vs 4%, p=0.
046).
ALT, albumin, and body weight changes were non-significant between groups.
Conclusion: Both SU and SGLT2 inhibitors demonstrated comparable glycemic control in DCLD, though the lower hypoglycemia incidence with SGLT2 inhibitors suggests a safety advantage in patients with prior hypoglycemia.

Related Results

[RETRACTED] Bridport Health Reviews - Powerfully Detoxifies The Liver, Lose Liver Fat And Improve Gut Health! v1
[RETRACTED] Bridport Health Reviews - Powerfully Detoxifies The Liver, Lose Liver Fat And Improve Gut Health! v1
[RETRACTED]Product Name - Bridport Health Ingredients - Milk Thistle, Beetroot, Artichoke Extract & More. Category - Liver Support Supplement Main Benefits - Helps Protect The ...
[RETRACTED] Bridport Health Liver Support Does It Really Work v1
[RETRACTED] Bridport Health Liver Support Does It Really Work v1
[RETRACTED]Depiction • Where to Get Bottle Online –Click Here • Item Name -Bridport Health Liver • Aftereffects - No Major Side Effects • Classification - Health • Accessibility -O...
COMPARISON OF GLYCEMIC CONTROL ACTIVITY OF SGLT2 INHIBITORS AND SULPHONYLUREAS IN PATIENTS OF IHD
COMPARISON OF GLYCEMIC CONTROL ACTIVITY OF SGLT2 INHIBITORS AND SULPHONYLUREAS IN PATIENTS OF IHD
The prevalence of Diabetes mellitus (DM) has escalated in the previous decades and is among the major risk factors for developing cardiovascular diseases.1,2 Multiple factors play ...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Flozins in Reducing Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk: A Literature Review
Flozins in Reducing Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk: A Literature Review
Introduction Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are a significant worldwide health issue, impacting millions of patients and being the primary cause of global illness and death. The co...
Mekanisme Penghambat Sodium-Glukosa Transport Protein-2 (SGLT2-i) pada Penyakit Kardiovaskular: Sebuah Tinjauan
Mekanisme Penghambat Sodium-Glukosa Transport Protein-2 (SGLT2-i) pada Penyakit Kardiovaskular: Sebuah Tinjauan
Proteksi kardiovaskular penting sebagai salah satu target tatalaksana pasien diabetes mellitus (DM) tipe 2. Penghambat sodium-glukosa kotransporter 2 (S...
Individualized Glycemic Index: A New Approach to Personalized Glycemic Control
Individualized Glycemic Index: A New Approach to Personalized Glycemic Control
ABSTRACT Introduction The assessment of glycemic control is fundamental for diabetes management. However, traditional measures ...

Back to Top