Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Digital governmentality: Participatory governance vs. biopolitics

View through CrossRef
The notion of governmentality was first used by the French postmodern philosopher Michel Foucault during his lectures at the College de France in 1978-1979. The term is one of the characteristics of political power, along with sovereignty and discipline, but it characterizes its later stages of evolution. Foucault and his commentators give multiple meanings to this term, but perhaps the most accurate ones are the definition of governmentality as a way of rational thinking about the realization of political power and governmentality as the art of government. The emergence of governmentality is associated with the emergence of political economy and implies the use of biopolitical techniques, a concept that Foucault introduces to emphasize the need for socio-hu- manitarian knowledge in disciplining the “political body”. Evolution and peculiarities of biopolitics are discussed in detail in this article in relation to each type of governmentality. This article examines three types of governmentality (liberalism, authoritarianism, neoliberalism) introduced by the French thinker and proposes considering a new type of governmentality that characterizes the modern stage of society’s development. Here we use a governmentality concept as a methodological instrument for analysis of a new type of governance. The author notes that digital governmentality is characterized by governance using digital platforms. The article provides a detailed description of the architecture of one such platforms, as well as a set of algorithms that will mediate the interaction between the population and government representatives. The purpose of this article is to identify the essence of digital governmentality and its nature. Is the emerging form of public governance through digital platforms, as a consequence of its digitalization, demo- cratic and participatory, or is it still a more sophisticated way of governing the population using manipulative, biopolitical strategies? An attempt to answer this question is made in the article by considering both the evolution of the term governmentality itself and the technological features of digital platforms with their interpretation based on Michel Foucault’s concept.
Saint Petersburg State University
Title: Digital governmentality: Participatory governance vs. biopolitics
Description:
The notion of governmentality was first used by the French postmodern philosopher Michel Foucault during his lectures at the College de France in 1978-1979.
The term is one of the characteristics of political power, along with sovereignty and discipline, but it characterizes its later stages of evolution.
Foucault and his commentators give multiple meanings to this term, but perhaps the most accurate ones are the definition of governmentality as a way of rational thinking about the realization of political power and governmentality as the art of government.
The emergence of governmentality is associated with the emergence of political economy and implies the use of biopolitical techniques, a concept that Foucault introduces to emphasize the need for socio-hu- manitarian knowledge in disciplining the “political body”.
Evolution and peculiarities of biopolitics are discussed in detail in this article in relation to each type of governmentality.
This article examines three types of governmentality (liberalism, authoritarianism, neoliberalism) introduced by the French thinker and proposes considering a new type of governmentality that characterizes the modern stage of society’s development.
Here we use a governmentality concept as a methodological instrument for analysis of a new type of governance.
The author notes that digital governmentality is characterized by governance using digital platforms.
The article provides a detailed description of the architecture of one such platforms, as well as a set of algorithms that will mediate the interaction between the population and government representatives.
The purpose of this article is to identify the essence of digital governmentality and its nature.
Is the emerging form of public governance through digital platforms, as a consequence of its digitalization, demo- cratic and participatory, or is it still a more sophisticated way of governing the population using manipulative, biopolitical strategies? An attempt to answer this question is made in the article by considering both the evolution of the term governmentality itself and the technological features of digital platforms with their interpretation based on Michel Foucault’s concept.

Related Results

Access Denied
Access Denied
Introduction As social-distancing mandates in response to COVID-19 restricted in-person data collection methods such as participant observation and interviews, researchers turned t...
Democratic Biopolitics
Democratic Biopolitics
Contemporary studies of biopolitics tend to assume that the rise of biopolitical governance entails the eclipse of democracy. The abstract egalitarianism of democratic government a...
Digital Technology for Co-Creation: Enabling Participatory Systems and Collective Intelligence
Digital Technology for Co-Creation: Enabling Participatory Systems and Collective Intelligence
Background: Contemporary societies face increasingly complex and interconnected challenges, so-called “wicked problems”, that defy traditional, top-down approaches to policy, resea...
Assembling the Space Economy: Governmentality and Economic Geography
Assembling the Space Economy: Governmentality and Economic Geography
Abstract The emergence of a ‘new’ economic geography in recent years has emphasised the ways economic processes are inextricably linked to po...
DEVELOPMENT AND GOVERNANCE IMPACTS OF DIGITAL PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE IN ETHIOPIA (DPI ETHIOPIA)
DEVELOPMENT AND GOVERNANCE IMPACTS OF DIGITAL PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE IN ETHIOPIA (DPI ETHIOPIA)
Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) is the foundation for digital transformation of economies. The goal of digital transformation in government is to create a more transparent, eff...
The influence of micro influencers and digital marketing on product purchasing decisions at tiktok shop in bengkulu city
The influence of micro influencers and digital marketing on product purchasing decisions at tiktok shop in bengkulu city
THE INFLUENCE OF MICRO-INFLUENCERS AND DIGITAL MARKETING ON PURCHASE DECISIONS OF TIKTOK SHOP CUSTOMERS IN BENGKULU CITY Andhes Tiani Putri, Meylaty F   12Faculty Of Economic E...
Integrating Lean-Informed Continuous Improvement with Participatory Groundwater Governance: A PDCA Maturity Framework
Integrating Lean-Informed Continuous Improvement with Participatory Groundwater Governance: A PDCA Maturity Framework
Groundwater management increasingly relies on participatory governance, yet most existing participatory frameworks lack mechanisms for iterative learning and continuous improvement...
Impact of Good Governance on Social and Economic Development in Rwanda
Impact of Good Governance on Social and Economic Development in Rwanda
The purpose of this study was assessed the impact of good governance on social and economic development in Rwanda. The specific objectives:  To determine the impact of good governa...

Back to Top