Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Althusser, Louis Pierre (1918–90)

View through CrossRef
Louis Althusser was the most influential philosopher to emerge in the revival of Marxist theory occasioned by the radical movements of the 1960s. His influence is, on the face of it, surprising, since Althusser’s Marx is not the theorist of revolutionary self-emancipation celebrated by the early Lukács. According to Althusser, Marx, along with Freud, was responsible for a ‘decentring’ of the human subject. History is ‘a process without a subject’. Its movement is beyond the comprehension of individual or collective subjects, and can only be grasped by a scientific ‘theoretical practice’ which keeps its distance from everyday experience. This austere version of Marxism nevertheless captured the imagination of many young intellectuals by calling for a ‘return to Marx’, with the implication that his writings had been distorted by the official communist movement. In fact, Althusser later conceded, his was an ‘imaginary Marxism’, a reconstruction of historical materialism reflecting the same philosophical climate that produced the post-structuralist appropriations of Nietzsche and Heidegger by Deleuze, Derrida and Foucault. Most of the philosophical difficulties in which Althusser found himself can be traced back to the impossibility of fusing Marx’s and Nietzsche’s thought into a new synthesis.
Title: Althusser, Louis Pierre (1918–90)
Description:
Louis Althusser was the most influential philosopher to emerge in the revival of Marxist theory occasioned by the radical movements of the 1960s.
His influence is, on the face of it, surprising, since Althusser’s Marx is not the theorist of revolutionary self-emancipation celebrated by the early Lukács.
According to Althusser, Marx, along with Freud, was responsible for a ‘decentring’ of the human subject.
History is ‘a process without a subject’.
Its movement is beyond the comprehension of individual or collective subjects, and can only be grasped by a scientific ‘theoretical practice’ which keeps its distance from everyday experience.
This austere version of Marxism nevertheless captured the imagination of many young intellectuals by calling for a ‘return to Marx’, with the implication that his writings had been distorted by the official communist movement.
In fact, Althusser later conceded, his was an ‘imaginary Marxism’, a reconstruction of historical materialism reflecting the same philosophical climate that produced the post-structuralist appropriations of Nietzsche and Heidegger by Deleuze, Derrida and Foucault.
Most of the philosophical difficulties in which Althusser found himself can be traced back to the impossibility of fusing Marx’s and Nietzsche’s thought into a new synthesis.

Related Results

Predicting 90-day survival of patients with COVID-19: Survival of Severely Ill COVID (SOSIC) scores
Predicting 90-day survival of patients with COVID-19: Survival of Severely Ill COVID (SOSIC) scores
Abstract Background Predicting outcomes of critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) patients with coronavirus-19 disease (COVID-19) is a major chall...
Impact of intensive prone position therapy on outcomes in intubated patients with ARDS related to COVID-19
Impact of intensive prone position therapy on outcomes in intubated patients with ARDS related to COVID-19
Abstract Background Previous retrospective research has shown that maintaining prone positioning (PP) for an average of 40 h is associated with an i...
Direito, estado e ideologia: notas sobre as perspectivas de Claude Lefort e de Louis Althusser
Direito, estado e ideologia: notas sobre as perspectivas de Claude Lefort e de Louis Althusser
Objetivos: O objetivo deste artigo é analisar o modo pelo qual Claude Lefort e Louis Althusser, a partir de suas reflexões sobre a ideologia, concebem o direito e o Estado. Para ta...

Back to Top