Abstract 139: Costs to Implement Components of Stroke Systems of Care Under the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Program

Objective: During 2012-2015, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Program (PCNASP) funded state health departments to improve the quality of stroke care in key clinical settings. The objective of this study was to assess costs for health departments and partners implementing PCNASP newly established programs. Methods: We developed Excel-based data collection instruments to collect costs associated with implementing stroke systems of care from volunteer PCNASP-funded health departments. Nine PCNASP-funded health departments were eligible based on program characteristics, six of which agreed to participate; five focused on pre- and in-hospital stroke care, and one also included transitions to post-hospital settings. These health departments partnered with a total of 467 organizations in their six states (37 to 125 partners per state). We used an activity-based costing approach to allocate costs across primary program activities: data collection, linkage, and management; clinical guidance and expertise; quality improvement (QI); building and maintaining partnerships; program evaluation; and administration. We collected costs to the health departments paid directly by PCNASP funds, in-kind contributions from the health department, and in-kind contributions from partners. Four of the six health departments received in-kind contributions from select partners. We analyzed costs by resource category (labor; materials, travel, services, equipment; contracts, consultants; overhead) and program activities across three settings: pre-hospital, in-hospital, and post-hospital. Results: Six health departments reported grant expenditures averaging $991,549 (ranging from $790,123 to $1,298,160) per health department over 36 months. Three of those health departments reported health department in-kind contributions averaging $374,439 (ranging from $5,805 to $1,394,097) for the same 36 months. Health departments reported greatest expenditures on labor (46%, ranging from 15% to 79%) and contracts and consultants (37%, ranging from 5% to 76%). Across program activities, health departments incurred costs for QI (37%, ranging from 17% to 60%); administration (19%, ranging from 7% to 39%); data (17%, ranging from 15% to 79%); partnerships (10%, ranging from 2% to 23%); clinical guidance (9%, ranging from 4% to 16%); and evaluation (8%, ranging from 4% to 15%). Four health departments collected in-kind contributions for 22 partners. Partners had average in-kind contributions of $373,211 (ranging from $1,040 to $1,421,729). Conclusion: Results from this study highlight key cost drivers of implementing components of stroke systems of care. This study was the first to comprehensively document actual costs of implementing QI for stroke systems of care across multiple programs and can inform future planning efforts.