Cost and efficacy of low-dose pembrolizumab in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer patients in Asia.

e19385 Background: Pembrolizumab has dramatically improved the survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is considered the standard of care for first line treatment of NSCLC who do not harbour oncogenic drivers. The fixed dose of 200mg was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. The dose of 200mg was based on pharmacokinetic analysis. Studies have demonstrated equivalent efficacy with weight-based dosing 2mg/kg. An average Asian weighs 50-60kg. We aimed to look at the efficacy of pembrolizumab at a low fixed dose compared to the standard dosing. Methods: A review of all consecutive patients receiving pembrolizumab for advanced NSCLC from January 2016 to December 2019 in a large, high-volume academic medical centre, the National University Hospital, Singapore was conducted. Data fields collected include patient’s demographics, treatment doses and clinical characteristics. Time on treatment and overall survival were analysed using the Kaplan Meier method. Results: In total, 92 ECOG 0-2 patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with pembrolizumab. Median age was 69 years (Range, 29-92). Most were males (76%) and Chinese race (68%). Of the 92 patients, 46 (50%) and 46 (50%) received 100mg (Pem100) and 200mg (Pem200) of pembrolizumab respectively. Pembrolizumab was prescribed as first line in 73 (79%) and second line in 19 patients (21%). The average dose of pembrolizumab received in the low dose group was 1.87mg/kg (Range, 1.24mg/kg – 2.70mg/kg). 88 patients were included in the survival analysis. 4 were excluded due to the presence of an oncogenic driver. Patients were followed up for a median of 13.2 months. There was no difference in progression free survival between Pem100 and Pem200 for first-line single agent and when combined with chemotherapy (PFS: NR versus 5.3months, HR 2.17, 95% CI 0.76-6.16, p = 0.15 and NR vs 16.9 months, HR 2.89, 95% CI 0.35-25.16, p = 0.33 respectively). For patients who received pembrolizumab in the first line setting, the response rate was 56% vs 20% (p = 0.07), 67% vs 52% (p = 0.69) for Pem100 and Pem200 as a single agent and when combined with chemotherapy respectively. The median number of cycles received was 8.9 (Range, 1-60 cycles), translating to estimated cost savings of SGD 45 395 (~ USD 32 664) per patient who received Pem100. Conclusions: A lower fixed dose of pembrolizumab at 100mg showed no difference in progression free survival and response rate in an Asian cohort with significant cost savings. A further randomised controlled trial in an Asian population should be carried out.