Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Risk Aversion

View through CrossRef
Abstract The decision‐making situation under risk is defined and the certainty equivalent of a lottery with unidimensional outcomes is introduced. An agent is globally risk averse if the risk premium (defined as the difference between the expected value and the certainty equivalent) of every lottery is nonnegative. This definition is used to show some characteristics of the certainty equivalent function that are associated with risk aversion. Risk aversion is equivalent to concavity of utility function if the expected utility theory holds. The comparison of risk aversion across agents is also examined. The notion of local risk aversion is introduced in general and with respect to the expected utility case, where again it is equivalent to concavity of utility function. A measure of risk aversion, if expected utility theory holds, is provided by the de Finetti–Arrow–Pratt index. Aversion toward increases in risk, that is, preference for less risky lotteries, is then examined with respect to two ways that increase risk: mean preserving spreads and probability mixtures. The equivalence of the former with second‐order stochastic dominance is examined. Finally, risk aversion and aversion to increasing risk with reference to the rank‐dependent expected utility model are examined mainly to show a kind of risk aversion (first‐order risk aversion) that is stronger than the risk aversion permitted by the expected utility theory (second‐order risk aversion).
Title: Risk Aversion
Description:
Abstract The decision‐making situation under risk is defined and the certainty equivalent of a lottery with unidimensional outcomes is introduced.
An agent is globally risk averse if the risk premium (defined as the difference between the expected value and the certainty equivalent) of every lottery is nonnegative.
This definition is used to show some characteristics of the certainty equivalent function that are associated with risk aversion.
Risk aversion is equivalent to concavity of utility function if the expected utility theory holds.
The comparison of risk aversion across agents is also examined.
The notion of local risk aversion is introduced in general and with respect to the expected utility case, where again it is equivalent to concavity of utility function.
A measure of risk aversion, if expected utility theory holds, is provided by the de Finetti–Arrow–Pratt index.
Aversion toward increases in risk, that is, preference for less risky lotteries, is then examined with respect to two ways that increase risk: mean preserving spreads and probability mixtures.
The equivalence of the former with second‐order stochastic dominance is examined.
Finally, risk aversion and aversion to increasing risk with reference to the rank‐dependent expected utility model are examined mainly to show a kind of risk aversion (first‐order risk aversion) that is stronger than the risk aversion permitted by the expected utility theory (second‐order risk aversion).

Related Results

Optimisation de portefeuille en présence des biais comportementaux
Optimisation de portefeuille en présence des biais comportementaux
La finance comportementale est une nouvelle science qui remet en question les principes de la finance classique qui est basée sur la rationalité des investisseurs et l’efficience d...
Time Varying Risk Aversion and Asset Returns
Time Varying Risk Aversion and Asset Returns
Prices and investors' behavior are heavily influenced by risk aversion. As it is unobservable, estimating risk aversion has been challenging for a long time. This paper proposes us...
What motivates avoidance in paranoia? Three failures to find a betrayal aversion effect
What motivates avoidance in paranoia? Three failures to find a betrayal aversion effect
Believing that others intend to harm you (paranoia) is often accompanied by social withdrawal, avoidance and isolation. We investigated whether paranoia is related to betrayal aver...
Risk Aversion and Audit Markets
Risk Aversion and Audit Markets
Standard setters aim to improve the audit quality of financial audits. We thus analyse the provided and demanded audit quality from risk-averse agents’ perspective. The auditor’s l...
Gender differences in guilt aversion in Korea and the United Kingdom
Gender differences in guilt aversion in Korea and the United Kingdom
Abstract Guilt aversion, which describes the tendency to reduce the discrepancy between a partner’s expectation and his/her actual outcome, is a key driving force for coope...
Gender differences in guilt aversion in Korea and the United Kingdom
Gender differences in guilt aversion in Korea and the United Kingdom
Guilt aversion, which describes the tendency to reduce the discrepancy between a partner’s expectation and his/her actual outcome, is a key driving force for cooperation in both th...
Gender differences in guilt aversion in Korea and the United Kingdom
Gender differences in guilt aversion in Korea and the United Kingdom
AbstractGuilt aversion, which describes the tendency to reduce the discrepancy between a partner’s expectation and his/her actual outcome, is a key driving force for cooperation in...

Back to Top