Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Jurisprudence of the State Administrative Court in the Development of State Administrative Law

View through CrossRef
The State Administrative Court is a judicial body that has absolute authority to examine and resolve disputes in the field of state administration. The development of the jurisprudence of the State Administrative Court (Peratun) is indispensable for the development of state administrative law. The issues studied are the role of jurisprudence in the field of state administrative law and the role of the State Administrative Court in providing access to justice. The method used in this study is library research, namely research whose object of study uses library data in the form of books as a data source. The Supreme Court has made efforts to strengthen jurisprudence so that it can support the development of administrative law. The judge's decision is needed as a source of law. This is because it stems from dynamic legal dispute resolution. Then, jurisprudence can bring social change to society. The judge's decision-making process is also faster than the law-making process. The absolute competence of the wider State Administrative Court can provide easy access to justice where the public can submit complaints about factual actions of the Government in the field of public law. Jurisprudence as a source of law is needed to develop state administrative law by taking into account the development of society, social conditions, legal and political conditions. Jurisprudence produces general principles of good governance so that they can be used to administer government wisely
Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu
Title: Jurisprudence of the State Administrative Court in the Development of State Administrative Law
Description:
The State Administrative Court is a judicial body that has absolute authority to examine and resolve disputes in the field of state administration.
The development of the jurisprudence of the State Administrative Court (Peratun) is indispensable for the development of state administrative law.
The issues studied are the role of jurisprudence in the field of state administrative law and the role of the State Administrative Court in providing access to justice.
The method used in this study is library research, namely research whose object of study uses library data in the form of books as a data source.
The Supreme Court has made efforts to strengthen jurisprudence so that it can support the development of administrative law.
The judge's decision is needed as a source of law.
This is because it stems from dynamic legal dispute resolution.
Then, jurisprudence can bring social change to society.
The judge's decision-making process is also faster than the law-making process.
The absolute competence of the wider State Administrative Court can provide easy access to justice where the public can submit complaints about factual actions of the Government in the field of public law.
Jurisprudence as a source of law is needed to develop state administrative law by taking into account the development of society, social conditions, legal and political conditions.
Jurisprudence produces general principles of good governance so that they can be used to administer government wisely.

Related Results

Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com Abstract Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
Administrative Law as the New Federalism
Administrative Law as the New Federalism
Few doubt the tremendous impact the modern national administrative state has had on our federal system. Yet the relationship between federalism and administrative law remains stra...
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash ABSTRACT In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
Diversity Defeated After Trial: May an Appellate Court Vacate a Judgment? 
Diversity Defeated After Trial: May an Appellate Court Vacate a Judgment? 
This article previews the Supreme Court case in <i>The Hains Celestial Group, Inc., Whole Foods Market, Inc. v. Sarah Palmquist</i>., No-24-724, argued to the Court on ...
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
The Constitutional Court received a total of 2,829 cases in 2022 alone. Among the decisions made by the Constitutional Court in 2022, this paper reviews major decisions centered on...
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
The study deal with selected problems of international law at the time of change of the 20th and 21st centuries. Such a milestone gives an opportunity to review the achieved state ...

Back to Top