Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Prognostic Value of ctDNA Mutation in Melanoma: A Meta-Analysis
View through CrossRef
Purpose. Melanoma is the most aggressive form of skin cancer. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a diagnostic and prognostic marker of melanoma. However, whether ctDNA mutations can independently predict survival remains controversial. This meta-analysis assessed the prognostic value of the presence or change in ctDNA mutations in melanoma patients. Methods. We identified studies from the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. We estimated the combined hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using either fixed-effect or random-effect models based on heterogeneity. Results. Sixteen studies including 1,781 patients were included. Both baseline and posttreatment detectable ctDNA were associated with poor OS (baseline detectable vs. undetectable, pooled HR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.64–2.36,
P
<
0.00001
; baseline undetectable vs. detectable, pooled HR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.11–0.36,
P
<
0.00001
; posttreatment detectable vs. undetectable, pooled HR = 2.36, 95% CI = 1.30–4.28,
P
=
0.005
). For PFS, baseline detectable ctDNA may be associated with adverse PFS (baseline detectable vs. undetectable, pooled HR = 1.41, 95% CI = 0.84–2.37,
P
=
0.19
; baseline undetectable vs. detectable, pooled HR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.19–0.95,
P
=
0.04
) and baseline high ctDNA and increased ctDNA were significantly associated with adverse PFS (baseline high vs. low/undetectable, pooled HR = 3.29, 95% CI = 1.73–6.25,
P
=
0.0003
; increase vs. decrease, pooled HR = 4.48, 95% CI = 2.45–8.17,
P
<
0.00001
). The baseline BRAFV600 ctDNA mutation-positive group was significantly associated with adverse OS compared with the baseline ctDNA-negative group (pooled HR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.58–2.29,
P
<
0.00001
). There were no significant differences in PFS between the baseline BRAFV600 ctDNA mutation-detectable group and the undetectable group (pooled HR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.72–1.44,
P
=
0.92
). Conclusion. The presence or elevation of ctDNA mutation or BRAFV600 ctDNA mutation was significantly associated with worse prognosis in melanoma patients.
Title: Prognostic Value of ctDNA Mutation in Melanoma: A Meta-Analysis
Description:
Purpose.
Melanoma is the most aggressive form of skin cancer.
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a diagnostic and prognostic marker of melanoma.
However, whether ctDNA mutations can independently predict survival remains controversial.
This meta-analysis assessed the prognostic value of the presence or change in ctDNA mutations in melanoma patients.
Methods.
We identified studies from the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases.
We estimated the combined hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using either fixed-effect or random-effect models based on heterogeneity.
Results.
Sixteen studies including 1,781 patients were included.
Both baseline and posttreatment detectable ctDNA were associated with poor OS (baseline detectable vs.
undetectable, pooled HR = 1.
97, 95% CI = 1.
64–2.
36,
P
<
0.
00001
; baseline undetectable vs.
detectable, pooled HR = 0.
19, 95% CI = 0.
11–0.
36,
P
<
0.
00001
; posttreatment detectable vs.
undetectable, pooled HR = 2.
36, 95% CI = 1.
30–4.
28,
P
=
0.
005
).
For PFS, baseline detectable ctDNA may be associated with adverse PFS (baseline detectable vs.
undetectable, pooled HR = 1.
41, 95% CI = 0.
84–2.
37,
P
=
0.
19
; baseline undetectable vs.
detectable, pooled HR = 0.
43, 95% CI = 0.
19–0.
95,
P
=
0.
04
) and baseline high ctDNA and increased ctDNA were significantly associated with adverse PFS (baseline high vs.
low/undetectable, pooled HR = 3.
29, 95% CI = 1.
73–6.
25,
P
=
0.
0003
; increase vs.
decrease, pooled HR = 4.
48, 95% CI = 2.
45–8.
17,
P
<
0.
00001
).
The baseline BRAFV600 ctDNA mutation-positive group was significantly associated with adverse OS compared with the baseline ctDNA-negative group (pooled HR = 1.
90, 95% CI = 1.
58–2.
29,
P
<
0.
00001
).
There were no significant differences in PFS between the baseline BRAFV600 ctDNA mutation-detectable group and the undetectable group (pooled HR = 1.
02, 95% CI = 0.
72–1.
44,
P
=
0.
92
).
Conclusion.
The presence or elevation of ctDNA mutation or BRAFV600 ctDNA mutation was significantly associated with worse prognosis in melanoma patients.
Related Results
Abstract P2-01-29: Prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in metastatic breast cancer
Abstract P2-01-29: Prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in metastatic breast cancer
Abstract
Introduction: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is widely used in the management of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) for tumor genotyping and detection of actiona...
Longitudinal circulating tumor DNA kinetics and correlation with patient outcomes in metastatic melanoma.
Longitudinal circulating tumor DNA kinetics and correlation with patient outcomes in metastatic melanoma.
e21538 Background: Previous studies have shown circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to be an accurate noninvasive method for detecting minimal residual disease and predicting therapeutic...
Clinical Application of Circulating Tumor DNA in Plasma of Patients with Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma
Clinical Application of Circulating Tumor DNA in Plasma of Patients with Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma
Introduction
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) which is tumor‐specific DNA sequences found in blood, has been considered an important new strategy that will aid in the t...
Abstract 3414: Systematic comparison of ctDNA vs tissue sequencing with a large panel to guide therapy in patients with advanced cancer: A study from the French National Center for Precision Medicine (PRISM)
Abstract 3414: Systematic comparison of ctDNA vs tissue sequencing with a large panel to guide therapy in patients with advanced cancer: A study from the French National Center for Precision Medicine (PRISM)
Abstract
Background: Genomic profiling with tissue sequencing is still considered as the gold standard despite several limitations including screening failures due t...
Abstract ED9-2A: Can ctDNA substitute tissue testing
Abstract ED9-2A: Can ctDNA substitute tissue testing
Abstract
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is at the forefront of liquid biopsy technology. A key advantage of ctDNA is being able to achieve genomic profiling from a bl...
Assessing circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) as a prognostic biomarker in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Assessing circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) as a prognostic biomarker in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction
Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising biomarker in various cancer types, including locally advanced rectal...
Clinical validity and utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC): a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
Clinical validity and utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC): a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
ABSTRACTPurposeCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing has become a promising tool to guide first-line (1L) targeted treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). This ...
Plasma ctDNA biomarker study in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation treated with sunvozertinib.
Plasma ctDNA biomarker study in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation treated with sunvozertinib.
8563 Background: There are limited reports on biomarker studies of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutation (exon...

