Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

S82. REINFORCEMENT LEARNING IMPAIRMENT IN PATIENTS WITH EARLY-STAGE PSYCHOTIC BIPOLAR DISORDER

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Abnormal reward sensitivity is a biosignature to mood disorders spectrum. Recent data suggested either elevated or preserved positive but impaired negative reinforcement learning in patients with bipolar disorder. Functional MRI studies provided extra evidence on heightened reward sensitivity in manic patients. Of note, these investigations mostly rest on chronically ill samples, conditions of whom may have been confounded by prolonged exposure to medications. This study aims to examine reinforcement learning performance and its relationship with symptomology in patients with early-stage psychotic bipolar disorder (BDP). Methods This study is based on 38 patients with early-stage BDP (defined by having received psychiatric treatment for first-episode BDP within 3 years since service entry) who have been euthymic for at least eight weeks and 40 demographically-matched controls. Reinforcement learning performance was evaluated using Gain-vs-Loss-Avoidance Task (GLAT), which measured the correct responses in both gain and loss-avoidance pairs with reinforcement probability at either 90% or 80% across four blocks in the training phase and one block in the test/transfer phase. Comparison analyses on reinforcement learning performance were conducted on two groups. Associations of reinforcement learning measures with symptom scores, cognitive functions and functioning measures were also tested. Results There was no group difference in gender, age or education level. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed significant main effects of group (F=6.52, p=0.013), block (F=43.71, p<0.001), probability (F= 5.58, p<0.001), and block x group (F=2.87, p=0.040) interaction. Post-hoc tests revealed that controls performed better than patients across blocks (p<0.05). Patients also showed a lower lose-shift rate (t= 2.21, p=0.03) and punishment-driven learning accuracy rates (t=2.42, p=0.018) than controls. Marginally significant main effect of stimulus pair (F=3.98, p=0.05) was revealed in the test phase, with controls showing a significantly higher preference in Frequent Winner vs Frequent Loser (FWFL) pair than patients (t=-2.25, p=0.028). No significant correlations between learning measures and any of the symptom dimensions in patient sample. Discussion Our preliminary findings provided a brief evidence on the negative reinforcement learning impairment in early-stage BDP patients. Further investigation is required to verify and confirm our results of impaired negative reinforcement learning in the initial course of bipolar disorder.
Title: S82. REINFORCEMENT LEARNING IMPAIRMENT IN PATIENTS WITH EARLY-STAGE PSYCHOTIC BIPOLAR DISORDER
Description:
Abstract Background Abnormal reward sensitivity is a biosignature to mood disorders spectrum.
Recent data suggested either elevated or preserved positive but impaired negative reinforcement learning in patients with bipolar disorder.
Functional MRI studies provided extra evidence on heightened reward sensitivity in manic patients.
Of note, these investigations mostly rest on chronically ill samples, conditions of whom may have been confounded by prolonged exposure to medications.
This study aims to examine reinforcement learning performance and its relationship with symptomology in patients with early-stage psychotic bipolar disorder (BDP).
Methods This study is based on 38 patients with early-stage BDP (defined by having received psychiatric treatment for first-episode BDP within 3 years since service entry) who have been euthymic for at least eight weeks and 40 demographically-matched controls.
Reinforcement learning performance was evaluated using Gain-vs-Loss-Avoidance Task (GLAT), which measured the correct responses in both gain and loss-avoidance pairs with reinforcement probability at either 90% or 80% across four blocks in the training phase and one block in the test/transfer phase.
Comparison analyses on reinforcement learning performance were conducted on two groups.
Associations of reinforcement learning measures with symptom scores, cognitive functions and functioning measures were also tested.
Results There was no group difference in gender, age or education level.
Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed significant main effects of group (F=6.
52, p=0.
013), block (F=43.
71, p<0.
001), probability (F= 5.
58, p<0.
001), and block x group (F=2.
87, p=0.
040) interaction.
Post-hoc tests revealed that controls performed better than patients across blocks (p<0.
05).
Patients also showed a lower lose-shift rate (t= 2.
21, p=0.
03) and punishment-driven learning accuracy rates (t=2.
42, p=0.
018) than controls.
Marginally significant main effect of stimulus pair (F=3.
98, p=0.
05) was revealed in the test phase, with controls showing a significantly higher preference in Frequent Winner vs Frequent Loser (FWFL) pair than patients (t=-2.
25, p=0.
028).
No significant correlations between learning measures and any of the symptom dimensions in patient sample.
Discussion Our preliminary findings provided a brief evidence on the negative reinforcement learning impairment in early-stage BDP patients.
Further investigation is required to verify and confirm our results of impaired negative reinforcement learning in the initial course of bipolar disorder.

Related Results

Hydatid Cyst of The Orbit: A Systematic Review with Meta-Data
Hydatid Cyst of The Orbit: A Systematic Review with Meta-Data
Abstarct Introduction Orbital hydatid cysts (HCs) constitute less than 1% of all cases of hydatidosis, yet their occurrence is often linked to severe visual complications. This stu...
T56. RISKY DECISION-MAKING IMPAIRMENT IN EARLY-STAGE PSYCHOTIC BIPOLAR DISORDER
T56. RISKY DECISION-MAKING IMPAIRMENT IN EARLY-STAGE PSYCHOTIC BIPOLAR DISORDER
Abstract Background Previous research suggests that bipolar disorder may be associated with increased risk-taking / impulsivity....
Contributions of Epidemiology to Our Understanding of Bipolar Disorder
Contributions of Epidemiology to Our Understanding of Bipolar Disorder
This chapter reviews the evidence on the prevalence, correlates, and burden of bipolar disorder from community-based surveys of general population samples. The pooled lifetime (12-...
Anticonvulsants in bipolar disorders: current research and practice and future directions
Anticonvulsants in bipolar disorders: current research and practice and future directions
Objectives:  To determine the clinical effectiveness of drugs with anticonvulsant properties for interventions in persons with bipolar disorder and to place these findings in the c...
Bipolar disorders and suicidal behaviour
Bipolar disorders and suicidal behaviour
Rihmer Z, Kiss K. Bipolar disorders and suicidal behaviour. 
Bipolar Disord 2002: 4(Suppl. 1): 21–25. © Blackwell Munksgaard, 2002Major depressive disorder is the leading cause of ...
Psychologist’s Therapeutic Communication with Adolescent Bipolar Disorder
Psychologist’s Therapeutic Communication with Adolescent Bipolar Disorder
Abstract. Bipolar Disorder is a complex and chronic mental disorder, characterized by drastic mood swings between manic (excessive excitement) and depressive (deep sadness) episode...
Depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and associated factors among adults, in the Eastern part of Ethiopia
Depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and associated factors among adults, in the Eastern part of Ethiopia
Abstract Background Depressive disorder is one of the severe and common mental illnesses in the general population. Bipolar disorder is a severe, pe...

Back to Top